Radiographic classification of mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A blinded prospective multi-disciplinary interobserver diagnostic performance study.

{"title":"Radiographic classification of mandibular osteoradionecrosis: A blinded prospective multi-disciplinary interobserver diagnostic performance study.","authors":"","doi":"10.1101/2025.02.11.25322082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a debilitating complication that affects up to 15% of head and neck cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy. The ASCO/ISOO/MASCC-endorsed ClinRad severity classification system was recently proposed (and recommended in the latest ASCO guidelines) to incorporate radiographic findings for determining ORNJ severity based on the vertical extent of bone necrosis. However, variability in imaging modalities and specialty-specific knowledge may contribute to disparities in diagnosing and classifying ORNJ. This study aims to evaluate and benchmark multi-specialty physician performance in diagnosing and severity classification of ORNJ using different radiographic imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single institution retrospective diagnostic validation study was conducted at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center involving 20 healthcare providers across varying specialties including oral oncology, radiation oncology, surgery, and neuroradiology. Participants reviewed 85 de-identified imaging sets including computed tomography (CT) and orthopantomogram (OPG) images from 30 patients with confirmed ORN, with blinded replicates (n=10) for assessment of intra-observer variability and asked to diagnose and stage ORNJ using the ClinRad system. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curves; intra- and inter-observer agreement were measured with Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, respectively. Sub-analyses considered physician specialty, years of clinical experience and level of confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired CT-OPG imaging improved ORNJ diagnostic performance across all specialties, with AUC values ranging from 0.79 (residents) to 0.98 (surgeons). Inter- and intra-rater agreements for ORNJ detection were limited, with median (IQR) Fleiss and Cohen's kappa values of 0.38 (0.22) and 0.08 (0.17), respectively. Slight to fair inter-rater agreement in severity classification ORNJ was observed with median (IQR) Fleiss kappa values of 0.22, 0.13, and 0.05 for stages 0/1, 2, and 3, respectively. The most commonly reported radiographic features for confirmed ORNJ cases staged as ClinRad grade 1 or 2 were \"bone necrosis confined to alveolar bone\" (22.7%), \"bone necrosis involving the basilar bone or maxillary sinus\" (14.8%), and \"bone lysis/sclerosis\" (20.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study establishes an essential benchmark for physician detection of radiographic ORNJ. The significant variability in diagnostic and severity classification observed across specialties emphasizes the need for standardized imaging protocols and specialist training as well as highlights the value of multimodality imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.11.25322082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a debilitating complication that affects up to 15% of head and neck cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy. The ASCO/ISOO/MASCC-endorsed ClinRad severity classification system was recently proposed (and recommended in the latest ASCO guidelines) to incorporate radiographic findings for determining ORNJ severity based on the vertical extent of bone necrosis. However, variability in imaging modalities and specialty-specific knowledge may contribute to disparities in diagnosing and classifying ORNJ. This study aims to evaluate and benchmark multi-specialty physician performance in diagnosing and severity classification of ORNJ using different radiographic imaging.

Methods: A single institution retrospective diagnostic validation study was conducted at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center involving 20 healthcare providers across varying specialties including oral oncology, radiation oncology, surgery, and neuroradiology. Participants reviewed 85 de-identified imaging sets including computed tomography (CT) and orthopantomogram (OPG) images from 30 patients with confirmed ORN, with blinded replicates (n=10) for assessment of intra-observer variability and asked to diagnose and stage ORNJ using the ClinRad system. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curves; intra- and inter-observer agreement were measured with Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, respectively. Sub-analyses considered physician specialty, years of clinical experience and level of confidence.

Results: Paired CT-OPG imaging improved ORNJ diagnostic performance across all specialties, with AUC values ranging from 0.79 (residents) to 0.98 (surgeons). Inter- and intra-rater agreements for ORNJ detection were limited, with median (IQR) Fleiss and Cohen's kappa values of 0.38 (0.22) and 0.08 (0.17), respectively. Slight to fair inter-rater agreement in severity classification ORNJ was observed with median (IQR) Fleiss kappa values of 0.22, 0.13, and 0.05 for stages 0/1, 2, and 3, respectively. The most commonly reported radiographic features for confirmed ORNJ cases staged as ClinRad grade 1 or 2 were "bone necrosis confined to alveolar bone" (22.7%), "bone necrosis involving the basilar bone or maxillary sinus" (14.8%), and "bone lysis/sclerosis" (20.0%).

Conclusion: This study establishes an essential benchmark for physician detection of radiographic ORNJ. The significant variability in diagnostic and severity classification observed across specialties emphasizes the need for standardized imaging protocols and specialist training as well as highlights the value of multimodality imaging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下颌骨放射性骨坏死的影像学分类:一项盲法、前瞻性、多学科、观察者间诊断表现研究。
背景:颌骨放射性骨坏死(ORNJ)是一种使人衰弱的并发症,在接受放疗的头颈癌患者中影响高达15%。ASCO/ISOO/ mascc认可的ClinRad严重程度分类系统最近被提出(并在最新的ASCO指南中被推荐),该系统根据骨坏死的垂直程度来确定ORNJ的严重程度。然而,成像方式和专业知识的差异可能导致ORNJ诊断和分类的差异。本研究旨在评价多专科医师在不同影像学诊断和严重程度分级方面的表现。方法:在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心进行了一项单机构回顾性诊断验证研究,涉及20名不同专业的医疗保健提供者,包括口腔肿瘤学、放射肿瘤学、外科和神经放射学。参与者回顾了来自30例确诊ORN患者的85组去识别成像,包括计算机断层扫描(CT)和正位断层扫描(OPG)图像,并进行了盲法重复(n=10),以评估观察者内部变异性,并要求使用ClinRad系统诊断和分期ORNJ。采用ROC曲线评估诊断效能;分别用Cohen's和Fleiss kappa测量观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性。亚分析考虑了医生专业、临床经验年数和信心水平。结果:配对CT-OPG成像改善了所有专科的ORNJ诊断性能,AUC值从0.79(住院医师)到0.98(外科医生)不等。ORNJ检测的评级间和评级内一致性有限,Fleiss和Cohen的kappa值中位数(IQR)分别为0.38(0.22)和0.08(0.17)。在ORNJ的严重程度分类中,评分者之间存在轻微到一般的一致性,0/1、2和3期的中位(IQR) Fleiss kappa值分别为0.22、0.13和0.05。ClinRad 1级或2级确诊ORNJ病例最常报道的影像学特征是“局限于牙槽骨的骨坏死”(22.7%),“累及基底骨或上颌窦的骨坏死”(14.8%)和“骨溶解/硬化”(20.0%)。结论:本研究为影像学诊断ORNJ建立了一个重要的基准。不同专业在诊断和严重程度分类上的显著差异强调了标准化成像协议和专家培训的必要性,同时也强调了多模态成像的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Should We Keep Changing the Clock? Characterizing Causal Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Behavior and Physiology. A norm-anchored structural deviation framework for characterizing cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia. Human RIG-I Antiviral Deficiency Caused by a Dominant-Negative Variant Locked in a Signaling-Inactive State. Immunotherapies for risk reduction in age-associated neurodegenerative diseases: impact of sex and treatment duration. Gene-Morphology Alignment via Graph-Constrained Latent Modeling for Molecular Subtype Prediction from Histopathology in Pancreatic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1