A qualitative exploration of stressors in anaesthesia training in the UK and mechanisms to improve resident wellbeing

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1111/anae.16575
Thomas Gale, Sophie Winter, Harriet Daykin, John Tredinick-Rowe, Lyndsey Withers, Marie Bryce
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of stressors in anaesthesia training in the UK and mechanisms to improve resident wellbeing","authors":"Thomas Gale,&nbsp;Sophie Winter,&nbsp;Harriet Daykin,&nbsp;John Tredinick-Rowe,&nbsp;Lyndsey Withers,&nbsp;Marie Bryce","doi":"10.1111/anae.16575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>High levels of stress and burnout have been identified among resident anaesthetists in UK training programmes. Factors involving clinical roles, workplace culture and training are known stressors, but in-depth research investigating how to improve wellbeing is limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a qualitative design in two phases with participants from across the UK. Phase 1 involved semi-structured interviews of resident anaesthetists in the 2nd–5th years of training, and educational stakeholders. Phase 2 involved additional participants in two focus groups, one each for residents and stakeholders. Interviews and focus groups were conducted online, audio-recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis using a framework approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We interviewed 52 participants in phase 1, comprising resident anaesthetists from England, Wales and Scotland and key educational stakeholders. A further 11 resident anaesthetists and stakeholders participated in the phase 2 focus groups. We identified four overarching themes contributing to stress: clinical work; non-clinical work; structure of training; and workplace culture. We also identified supportive features at individual, local, regional and national levels. Stress and burnout were commonplace, particularly during demanding periods of training. Balancing non-clinical commitments alongside busy workloads was difficult. Clinically, intensive care medicine and obstetrics generated the most stress. Frequent rotations and long commutes increased stress, impacting on working and family relationships. Curriculum changes, examinations and competition for higher training posts caused stress and poor morale. Proposed mechanisms to improve wellbeing include: peer-to-peer support; request-based rotas; adoption of ‘lead employers’; decreasing rotation frequency and commuting distances; access to less than full-time working and professional support; and adapting the structure of training to improve the stability of the resident anaesthetist workforce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Attention to the factors identified as contributing to stress could improve resident anaesthetists' wellbeing through changes to policy and practice at local, regional and national levels, for which we make research-informed recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 7","pages":"799-811"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16575","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16575","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

High levels of stress and burnout have been identified among resident anaesthetists in UK training programmes. Factors involving clinical roles, workplace culture and training are known stressors, but in-depth research investigating how to improve wellbeing is limited.

Methods

We used a qualitative design in two phases with participants from across the UK. Phase 1 involved semi-structured interviews of resident anaesthetists in the 2nd–5th years of training, and educational stakeholders. Phase 2 involved additional participants in two focus groups, one each for residents and stakeholders. Interviews and focus groups were conducted online, audio-recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis using a framework approach.

Results

We interviewed 52 participants in phase 1, comprising resident anaesthetists from England, Wales and Scotland and key educational stakeholders. A further 11 resident anaesthetists and stakeholders participated in the phase 2 focus groups. We identified four overarching themes contributing to stress: clinical work; non-clinical work; structure of training; and workplace culture. We also identified supportive features at individual, local, regional and national levels. Stress and burnout were commonplace, particularly during demanding periods of training. Balancing non-clinical commitments alongside busy workloads was difficult. Clinically, intensive care medicine and obstetrics generated the most stress. Frequent rotations and long commutes increased stress, impacting on working and family relationships. Curriculum changes, examinations and competition for higher training posts caused stress and poor morale. Proposed mechanisms to improve wellbeing include: peer-to-peer support; request-based rotas; adoption of ‘lead employers’; decreasing rotation frequency and commuting distances; access to less than full-time working and professional support; and adapting the structure of training to improve the stability of the resident anaesthetist workforce.

Discussion

Attention to the factors identified as contributing to stress could improve resident anaesthetists' wellbeing through changes to policy and practice at local, regional and national levels, for which we make research-informed recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国麻醉培训的压力源的定性探索和机制,以提高居民的福祉
在英国的培训项目中,高水平的压力和倦怠已经在住院麻醉师中被发现。包括临床角色、工作场所文化和培训在内的因素是已知的压力源,但关于如何改善幸福感的深入研究是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Conscious sedation vs. general anaesthesia for the peri-operative management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a reply. Interpreting the afternoon disadvantage: accounting for mediation, weighting and secular trends: a reply. Chronic pain after day-case surgery: the next challenge in the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): baseline data from day surgery practice in the UK. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): chronic post-surgical pain prevalence and associations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1