Maurício Pietrocola, Samuel Schnorr, Ernani Rodrigues
{"title":"Science Education in a Risk Society: Addressing Challenges and Opportunities in an Uncertain Future","authors":"Maurício Pietrocola, Samuel Schnorr, Ernani Rodrigues","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10238-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contemporary science education themes are marked by the inevitable uncertainty of consequences emerging from human actions. They encompass disasters, pandemics and other events that have been marking our present times. Understanding new risks as the ones resulting from human action, even when proposing a solution for an issue, is one of the central assumptions of the Risk Society theory. Given the challenges of teaching about uncertain scenarios, in this work we address ways for dealing with science teaching situations in which unpredictable events are the rule. We report a teaching and learning sequence implementation in the 9th grade of a Brazilian mid school, using a real case of disaster to develop a didactic approach accounting for human-made risks. In this work we aimed to explore strategies for preparing teachers to deal with the inherent uncertainty of risk situations, overlapping semantic network analysis, risk matrix construction and its collective evaluation with. rounds of discussion and emphasizing the risk-confidence paradigm over the traditional hazardsecurity perspective. Our results show evidence of students' appropriation of the notion of manufactured risk by enacting complex causal relations in unpredictable scenarios, something also reflected in their utterances and in their pattern of choice during risk matrix building.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10238-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contemporary science education themes are marked by the inevitable uncertainty of consequences emerging from human actions. They encompass disasters, pandemics and other events that have been marking our present times. Understanding new risks as the ones resulting from human action, even when proposing a solution for an issue, is one of the central assumptions of the Risk Society theory. Given the challenges of teaching about uncertain scenarios, in this work we address ways for dealing with science teaching situations in which unpredictable events are the rule. We report a teaching and learning sequence implementation in the 9th grade of a Brazilian mid school, using a real case of disaster to develop a didactic approach accounting for human-made risks. In this work we aimed to explore strategies for preparing teachers to deal with the inherent uncertainty of risk situations, overlapping semantic network analysis, risk matrix construction and its collective evaluation with. rounds of discussion and emphasizing the risk-confidence paradigm over the traditional hazardsecurity perspective. Our results show evidence of students' appropriation of the notion of manufactured risk by enacting complex causal relations in unpredictable scenarios, something also reflected in their utterances and in their pattern of choice during risk matrix building.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.