Achievement goal profiles and reading-related outcomes in elementary students with and without reading difficulties

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102661
Eunsoo Cho , Unhee Ju , Eun Ha Kim , Donald L. Compton
{"title":"Achievement goal profiles and reading-related outcomes in elementary students with and without reading difficulties","authors":"Eunsoo Cho ,&nbsp;Unhee Ju ,&nbsp;Eun Ha Kim ,&nbsp;Donald L. Compton","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored (a) achievement goal profiles among fifth-grade students, (b) whether reading difficulty (RD) status is predictive of achievement goal profiles, and (c) how different achievement goal profiles relate to achievement, motivation, and behavioral engagement in reading. Three profiles among fifth graders with RDs (<em>n</em> = 138) and typical readers (<em>n</em> = 109) emerged through the factor mixture model, with the <em>High Mastery</em> profile (46 %) being the most prevalent, followed by the <em>High All</em> profile (35 %) and the <em>High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance</em> profile (19 %). Students with RDs were twice as likely to be in the <em>High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance</em> profile as in the <em>High Mastery</em> profile. Results underscore the potentially deleterious effects of performance-avoidance and -approach goals. The <em>High Mastery</em> profile had better reading comprehension than the <em>High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance</em> profile and better behavioral engagement than the <em>High All</em> profile. Such patterns were held when the outcomes were compared within the RD group.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implication</h3><div>This study examined the achievement goals of upper elementary students, the unique goal profile for those facing reading difficulties, and their impact on reading-related outcomes. The findings reveal that most students possess mastery goals, albeit with varying degrees of performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Notably, students with reading difficulties are more inclined toward having both mastery and performance-avoidance goals, the profile associated with poorer reading comprehension outcomes. Furthermore, students with multiple goals exhibit lower behavioral engagement in class compared to those predominantly focused on mastery goals. These results underscore the potential negative impact of performance goals on reading-related outcomes and the critical need for creating learning environments that discourage social comparisons and competitive dynamics, which can foster performance-oriented goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102661"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000378","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored (a) achievement goal profiles among fifth-grade students, (b) whether reading difficulty (RD) status is predictive of achievement goal profiles, and (c) how different achievement goal profiles relate to achievement, motivation, and behavioral engagement in reading. Three profiles among fifth graders with RDs (n = 138) and typical readers (n = 109) emerged through the factor mixture model, with the High Mastery profile (46 %) being the most prevalent, followed by the High All profile (35 %) and the High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance profile (19 %). Students with RDs were twice as likely to be in the High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance profile as in the High Mastery profile. Results underscore the potentially deleterious effects of performance-avoidance and -approach goals. The High Mastery profile had better reading comprehension than the High Mastery/Performance-Avoidance profile and better behavioral engagement than the High All profile. Such patterns were held when the outcomes were compared within the RD group.

Educational relevance and implication

This study examined the achievement goals of upper elementary students, the unique goal profile for those facing reading difficulties, and their impact on reading-related outcomes. The findings reveal that most students possess mastery goals, albeit with varying degrees of performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Notably, students with reading difficulties are more inclined toward having both mastery and performance-avoidance goals, the profile associated with poorer reading comprehension outcomes. Furthermore, students with multiple goals exhibit lower behavioral engagement in class compared to those predominantly focused on mastery goals. These results underscore the potential negative impact of performance goals on reading-related outcomes and the critical need for creating learning environments that discourage social comparisons and competitive dynamics, which can foster performance-oriented goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有和无阅读困难小学生的成就目标概况和阅读相关结果
本研究探讨了(a)五年级学生的成就目标概况,(b)阅读困难状况是否能预测成就目标概况,以及(c)不同的成就目标概况与阅读成就、动机和行为投入之间的关系。通过因子混合模型,在阅读障碍五年级学生(n = 138)和典型阅读者(n = 109)中出现了三种特征,其中高掌握特征(46%)最为普遍,其次是高全部特征(35%)和高掌握/表现回避特征(19%)。有rd的学生出现高精通/逃避表现的可能性是高精通的两倍。结果强调了表现回避和接近目标的潜在有害影响。高精通型比高精通/行为回避型有更好的阅读理解,比高精通型有更好的行为投入。当在RD组内比较结果时,这种模式被保留。本研究探讨了小学高年级学生的学业成就目标、阅读困难学生的独特目标特征及其对阅读相关结果的影响。研究结果显示,大多数学生都有掌握目标,尽管他们有不同程度的表现接近目标和表现回避目标。值得注意的是,有阅读困难的学生更倾向于同时拥有精通和逃避表现的目标,这两种目标与较差的阅读理解结果有关。此外,与那些主要专注于精通目标的学生相比,有多个目标的学生在课堂上表现出更低的行为参与度。这些结果强调了成绩目标对阅读相关结果的潜在负面影响,以及创造不鼓励社会比较和竞争动态的学习环境的迫切需要,这可以促进以成绩为导向的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board AI-based educational interventions for enhancing cognitive learning processes in students with disabilities: A meta-analysis The association between private tutoring and mathematics learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools: A three-level meta-analysis Nurturing nature: Educogenetics at schools? The influence of learners' prior knowledge composition on interpersonal brain synchronization and learning outcomes in learning by teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1