Rui Wang , Qiuxiang Lin , Li Sheng , Yan Zhang , Haoyu Wen , You Li , Mingxia Shi , Xiao Xiao , Li Yan , Canjie Guo , Qi Miao , Jing Hua , Zuxiong Huang , Hai Li , M. Eric Gershwin , Qixia Wang , Xiong Ma , Min Lian
{"title":"Optimizing the tapering scheme of corticosteroid treatment for acute onset of autoimmune hepatitis","authors":"Rui Wang , Qiuxiang Lin , Li Sheng , Yan Zhang , Haoyu Wen , You Li , Mingxia Shi , Xiao Xiao , Li Yan , Canjie Guo , Qi Miao , Jing Hua , Zuxiong Huang , Hai Li , M. Eric Gershwin , Qixia Wang , Xiong Ma , Min Lian","doi":"10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Uncertainties persist regarding the optimal management of acute onset of autoimmune hepatitis, including the use of corticosteroids. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of rapid versus slow corticosteroid tapering in acute onset of AIH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicenter study involving patients with acute AIH was conducted. We defined acute AIH as an acute presentation (<30 days) with AIH and exhibiting no evidence of pre-existing liver diseases. Initially, corticosteroid treatment and overall outcomes were reported. Subsequently, the role of corticosteroid tapering rate in modifying outcomes across subgroups was investigated. For patients with an initial corticosteroid dose of 20 mg/day or higher, we further classified patients into rapid tapering group (duration until dose of prednisone <20 mg/day <3 weeks) and slow tapering group (duration until dose of prednisone <20 mg/day ≥3 weeks). Adverse events were defined as any of the following events, progression (e.g., acute icteric AIH progression to AS-AIH or AIH-ALF, AS-AIH progression to AIH-ALF, non-cirrhotic progression to cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis progression to decompensation), LT, and liver-related death.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study enrolled 237 patients, with 109 presenting acute icteric AIH, 97 with acute-severe AIH (AS-AIH), and 31 with AIH-acute liver failure (ALF). Among patients with acute icteric AIH, slow tapering significantly improved adverse outcome-free survival compared to rapid tapering (99 % <em>vs.</em> 71 %, <em>P</em> < 0.0001). Similarly, in AS-AIH patients, slow tapering resulted in notably higher adverse outcome-free survival rates compared to rapid tapering (92 % <em>vs.</em> 54 %, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Slow tapering independently predicted fewer adverse events (OR 0.144; 95 % CI 0.037–0.562; <em>P</em> = 0.005). However, in AIH-acute liver failure (ALF) patients, tapering rate did not significantly affect adverse outcome-free survival (38 % <em>vs.</em> 50 %, <em>P</em> = 0.590). Overall, there were no significant differences in osteoporosis or infection occurrence between tapering groups in the entire acute AIH cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A slow corticosteroid tapering reduced adverse outcomes in acute exacerbation of AIH patients, particularly in acute icteric AIH and AS-AIH.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoimmunity","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 103387"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of autoimmunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896841125000320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Uncertainties persist regarding the optimal management of acute onset of autoimmune hepatitis, including the use of corticosteroids. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of rapid versus slow corticosteroid tapering in acute onset of AIH.
Methods
A multicenter study involving patients with acute AIH was conducted. We defined acute AIH as an acute presentation (<30 days) with AIH and exhibiting no evidence of pre-existing liver diseases. Initially, corticosteroid treatment and overall outcomes were reported. Subsequently, the role of corticosteroid tapering rate in modifying outcomes across subgroups was investigated. For patients with an initial corticosteroid dose of 20 mg/day or higher, we further classified patients into rapid tapering group (duration until dose of prednisone <20 mg/day <3 weeks) and slow tapering group (duration until dose of prednisone <20 mg/day ≥3 weeks). Adverse events were defined as any of the following events, progression (e.g., acute icteric AIH progression to AS-AIH or AIH-ALF, AS-AIH progression to AIH-ALF, non-cirrhotic progression to cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis progression to decompensation), LT, and liver-related death.
Results
This retrospective cohort study enrolled 237 patients, with 109 presenting acute icteric AIH, 97 with acute-severe AIH (AS-AIH), and 31 with AIH-acute liver failure (ALF). Among patients with acute icteric AIH, slow tapering significantly improved adverse outcome-free survival compared to rapid tapering (99 % vs. 71 %, P < 0.0001). Similarly, in AS-AIH patients, slow tapering resulted in notably higher adverse outcome-free survival rates compared to rapid tapering (92 % vs. 54 %, P < 0.001). Slow tapering independently predicted fewer adverse events (OR 0.144; 95 % CI 0.037–0.562; P = 0.005). However, in AIH-acute liver failure (ALF) patients, tapering rate did not significantly affect adverse outcome-free survival (38 % vs. 50 %, P = 0.590). Overall, there were no significant differences in osteoporosis or infection occurrence between tapering groups in the entire acute AIH cohort.
Conclusion
A slow corticosteroid tapering reduced adverse outcomes in acute exacerbation of AIH patients, particularly in acute icteric AIH and AS-AIH.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Autoimmunity serves as the primary publication for research on various facets of autoimmunity. These include topics such as the mechanism of self-recognition, regulation of autoimmune responses, experimental autoimmune diseases, diagnostic tests for autoantibodies, as well as the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of autoimmune diseases. While the journal covers a wide range of subjects, it emphasizes papers exploring the genetic, molecular biology, and cellular aspects of the field.
The Journal of Translational Autoimmunity, on the other hand, is a subsidiary journal of the Journal of Autoimmunity. It focuses specifically on translating scientific discoveries in autoimmunity into clinical applications and practical solutions. By highlighting research that bridges the gap between basic science and clinical practice, the Journal of Translational Autoimmunity aims to advance the understanding and treatment of autoimmune diseases.