{"title":"Tegafur-uracil maintenance chemotherapy post-chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: Randomized trial","authors":"Kosei Hasegawa , Shin Nishio , Kouji Yamamoto , Hiroyuki Fujiwara , Hiroya Itagaki , Tomonori Nagai , Hirokuni Takano , Satoshi Yamaguchi , Akiko Kudoh , Yurina Suzuki , Tomoko Nakamoto , Akira Kurosaki , Masaaki Kamio , Kazuyoshi Kato , Kazuto Nakamura , Kazuhiro Takehara , Hideaki Yahata , Hiroaki Kobayashi , Motoaki Saito , Keiichi Fujiwara","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), but recurrence rates remain high. This multicenter phase-3 randomized trial (GOTIC-002) evaluated the efficacy of low-dose oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) as maintenance chemotherapy following curative CCRT for LACC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 2010 and 2018, 351 patients with stage Ib2-IVa cervical cancer were enrolled. After achieving complete or partial remission post-CCRT, patients were randomized 1:1 into observation (arm O) or UFT maintenance therapy (arm UFT). UFT doses were 300–400 mg/day based on body surface area for 2 years, disease progression or adverse effects occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) and safety as secondary endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patient characteristics were similar between the groups (n = 178 in arm O, n = 173 in arm UFT). During a median follow-up of 3 years, median PFS was not reached in either group. 5-year PFS rates were similar between them (arm O: 61.3 %, arm UFT: 62.0 %, hazard ratio: 0.92, <em>P</em> = .634). 5-year OS rates were also comparable (77.6 % vs 76.1 %, hazard ratio: 1.04, <em>P</em> = .869). Compliance with UFT ranged from 87.8 % to 98.8 %. Although adverse events were more frequent in arm UFT (93.5 % vs 73.9 %, odds ratio: 5.05), most were mild or moderate. Despite its tolerability, UFT did not improve PFS or OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest the need to reconsider maintenance therapy strategies after CCRT for potentially shifting away from cytotoxic chemotherapy towards alternative methods to enhance survival outcomes in patients with LACC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 115304"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925000851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), but recurrence rates remain high. This multicenter phase-3 randomized trial (GOTIC-002) evaluated the efficacy of low-dose oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) as maintenance chemotherapy following curative CCRT for LACC.
Methods
Between 2010 and 2018, 351 patients with stage Ib2-IVa cervical cancer were enrolled. After achieving complete or partial remission post-CCRT, patients were randomized 1:1 into observation (arm O) or UFT maintenance therapy (arm UFT). UFT doses were 300–400 mg/day based on body surface area for 2 years, disease progression or adverse effects occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) and safety as secondary endpoints.
Results
Patient characteristics were similar between the groups (n = 178 in arm O, n = 173 in arm UFT). During a median follow-up of 3 years, median PFS was not reached in either group. 5-year PFS rates were similar between them (arm O: 61.3 %, arm UFT: 62.0 %, hazard ratio: 0.92, P = .634). 5-year OS rates were also comparable (77.6 % vs 76.1 %, hazard ratio: 1.04, P = .869). Compliance with UFT ranged from 87.8 % to 98.8 %. Although adverse events were more frequent in arm UFT (93.5 % vs 73.9 %, odds ratio: 5.05), most were mild or moderate. Despite its tolerability, UFT did not improve PFS or OS.
Conclusions
These findings suggest the need to reconsider maintenance therapy strategies after CCRT for potentially shifting away from cytotoxic chemotherapy towards alternative methods to enhance survival outcomes in patients with LACC.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.