Friction and wear failure mechanism analysis of QT600-3 ductile iron elevator traction sheave

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109414
Yueyang Jiang , Zhong Wen , Yongxian Chen , Chao Xiang , Shengqi Chao
{"title":"Friction and wear failure mechanism analysis of QT600-3 ductile iron elevator traction sheave","authors":"Yueyang Jiang ,&nbsp;Zhong Wen ,&nbsp;Yongxian Chen ,&nbsp;Chao Xiang ,&nbsp;Shengqi Chao","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Elevators play a significant role in the daily lives. The traction sheave is the primary component responsible for bearing the force within an elevator system. The elevator car is propelled through the friction generated between the steel wire rope and the groove of the traction sheave. Over time, Prolonged operation results in significant wear between the traction sheave and the steel wire rope. This paper adopts a multi-methodological approach, utilizing macro and micro morphology analysis, equivalent friction coefficient analysis, and cloth hardness testing to elucidate the underlying causes of traction sheave failure. Groove C exhibits the most severe wear, with a maximum wear depth exceeding that of the other grooves by 2.4 mm. Measurements indicate that the <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>angle of groove C is 101°and the <span><math><mi>γ</mi></math></span>angle is 11°, which are significantly below the specified requirements. Additionally, measurements of grooves A, B, D, and E reveal that their<span><math><mi>γ</mi></math></span>angles are all less than 35°, thus failing to meet the specified standards. The average hardness of the material is 208.9 HBW. The friction coefficient of groove C under loading and braking conditions is 0.23, while the friction coefficient under holding conditions is 2.11. The findings reveal that wear is the predominant factor contributing to the deterioration of the traction wheel. The surface of the worn rope groove is characterized by numerous abrasive particles, pits, cracks, scratches, and other forms of surface damage. The deterioration of surface quality and the emergence of uneven surface roughness after wear further exacerbate the progression of uneven wear. The hardness of the base material does not meet established standards. Finally, to extend the service life of the traction sheaves and prevent accidents, we propose several improvement recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 109414"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725001554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elevators play a significant role in the daily lives. The traction sheave is the primary component responsible for bearing the force within an elevator system. The elevator car is propelled through the friction generated between the steel wire rope and the groove of the traction sheave. Over time, Prolonged operation results in significant wear between the traction sheave and the steel wire rope. This paper adopts a multi-methodological approach, utilizing macro and micro morphology analysis, equivalent friction coefficient analysis, and cloth hardness testing to elucidate the underlying causes of traction sheave failure. Groove C exhibits the most severe wear, with a maximum wear depth exceeding that of the other grooves by 2.4 mm. Measurements indicate that the βangle of groove C is 101°and the γangle is 11°, which are significantly below the specified requirements. Additionally, measurements of grooves A, B, D, and E reveal that theirγangles are all less than 35°, thus failing to meet the specified standards. The average hardness of the material is 208.9 HBW. The friction coefficient of groove C under loading and braking conditions is 0.23, while the friction coefficient under holding conditions is 2.11. The findings reveal that wear is the predominant factor contributing to the deterioration of the traction wheel. The surface of the worn rope groove is characterized by numerous abrasive particles, pits, cracks, scratches, and other forms of surface damage. The deterioration of surface quality and the emergence of uneven surface roughness after wear further exacerbate the progression of uneven wear. The hardness of the base material does not meet established standards. Finally, to extend the service life of the traction sheaves and prevent accidents, we propose several improvement recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Digital Market: E-Commerce Application For Farmers
M. Bhende, M. Avatade, Suvarna Patil, Pooja Mishra, P. Prasad, Shubham Shewalkar
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
A physics-informed framework for feature extraction and defect segmentation in pulsed infrared thermography Failure analysis of a torsion spring: A microstructural and finite element assessment Impact-induced failure and mechanical response of rapidly solidified sealing materials for blast holes A perspective on the structural integrity of notched components through the Effective Critical Plane approach Experimental study on progressive collapse resistance of corroded RC continuous deep flexural members
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1