Development and validation of a new prognostic tool for hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing resection: The Weighted Alpha-Fetoprotein Tumor Burden Score (WATS)

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109677
Tonghui Lu , Kailing Xie , Yan Chen , Mingxiu Ma , Yaming Guo , Tianqiang Jin , Chaoliu Dai , Feng Xu
{"title":"Development and validation of a new prognostic tool for hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing resection: The Weighted Alpha-Fetoprotein Tumor Burden Score (WATS)","authors":"Tonghui Lu ,&nbsp;Kailing Xie ,&nbsp;Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Mingxiu Ma ,&nbsp;Yaming Guo ,&nbsp;Tianqiang Jin ,&nbsp;Chaoliu Dai ,&nbsp;Feng Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to develop and validate a novel prognostic index, the Weighted Alpha-Fetoprotein Tumor Burden Score (WATS), for predicting outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing resection.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A total of 772 resected HCC patients were included. WATS was developed and validated using an 8:2 cohort split. The score was derived from multivariate Cox regression, resulting in the formula: WATS = 0.73 × tumor number +0.17 × tumor size +0.1 × ln AFP. The time-dependent ROC curve assessed the score's predictive ability, while restricted cubic splines evaluated the dose-response relationship between WATS and prognostic outcomes. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression further validated the prognostic accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the training cohort, AUCs for progression-free survival (PFS) at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 0.683, 0.664, 0.661, 0.633, and 0.620, respectively; for overall survival (OS), they were 0.757, 0.732, 0.703, 0.672, and 0.670, respectively. In the validation cohort, AUCs for PFS were 0.711, 0.654, 0.671, 0.662, and 0.684, respectively; for OS, they were 0.724, 0.688, 0.642, 0.698, and 0.721, respectively. WATS outperformed other complex indicators and staging systems. RCS analysis showed a linear relationship between WATS and outcomes. The nomogram based on WATS demonstrated excellent discrimination, calibration, and clinical benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>WATS is a novel, reliable prognostic tool for HCC post-resection, offering enhanced patient stratification and risk assessment, thereby improving clinical management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 109677"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325001052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to develop and validate a novel prognostic index, the Weighted Alpha-Fetoprotein Tumor Burden Score (WATS), for predicting outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing resection.

Materials and methods

A total of 772 resected HCC patients were included. WATS was developed and validated using an 8:2 cohort split. The score was derived from multivariate Cox regression, resulting in the formula: WATS = 0.73 × tumor number +0.17 × tumor size +0.1 × ln AFP. The time-dependent ROC curve assessed the score's predictive ability, while restricted cubic splines evaluated the dose-response relationship between WATS and prognostic outcomes. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression further validated the prognostic accuracy.

Results

In the training cohort, AUCs for progression-free survival (PFS) at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 0.683, 0.664, 0.661, 0.633, and 0.620, respectively; for overall survival (OS), they were 0.757, 0.732, 0.703, 0.672, and 0.670, respectively. In the validation cohort, AUCs for PFS were 0.711, 0.654, 0.671, 0.662, and 0.684, respectively; for OS, they were 0.724, 0.688, 0.642, 0.698, and 0.721, respectively. WATS outperformed other complex indicators and staging systems. RCS analysis showed a linear relationship between WATS and outcomes. The nomogram based on WATS demonstrated excellent discrimination, calibration, and clinical benefit.

Conclusion

WATS is a novel, reliable prognostic tool for HCC post-resection, offering enhanced patient stratification and risk assessment, thereby improving clinical management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝细胞癌切除术预后新工具的开发和验证:加权甲胎蛋白肿瘤负荷评分(WATS)
目的:本研究旨在建立并验证一种新的预后指标——加权甲胎蛋白肿瘤负荷评分(WATS),用于预测肝细胞癌(HCC)切除术患者的预后。材料与方法共纳入772例肝细胞癌切除术患者。WATS的开发和验证采用8:2的队列划分。多因素Cox回归得出评分公式:WATS = 0.73 ×肿瘤数+0.17 ×肿瘤大小+0.1 × ln AFP。时间相关的ROC曲线评估了评分的预测能力,而限制三次样条评估了WATS与预后之间的剂量-反应关系。Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox回归进一步验证了预后的准确性。结果在培训队列中,1年、2年、3年、4年和5年的无进展生存(PFS) auc分别为0.683、0.664、0.661、0.633和0.620;总生存期(OS)分别为0.757、0.732、0.703、0.672、0.670。在验证队列中,PFS的auc分别为0.711、0.654、0.671、0.662和0.684;操作系统分别为0.724、0.688、0.642、0.698、0.721。WATS优于其他复杂指标和分级系统。RCS分析显示WATS与预后呈线性关系。基于WATS的nomogram显示出良好的鉴别、校准和临床效益。结论wats是一种新颖、可靠的肝癌切除术后预后工具,可加强患者分层和风险评估,从而改善临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Tumour localization and oncological outcomes in nonuterine leiomyosarcoma of the abdomen and pelvis Factors influencing surgical decision-making in breast cancer: A multicenter study in Japan The utility of large language models in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: A systematic review Global burden, trends, and attributable risk factors of women's cancers with projection to 2050: Results from the GLOBOCAN 2022 and global burden of disease study 2021 Microwave ablation versus surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: A propensity score–based analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1