Resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases by an expert panel: Potential impact on hospitals referring patients for local treatment

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109681
Marinde J.G. Bond , Cornelis Verhoef , Geert Kazemier , Niels F.M. Kok , Michael F. Gerhards , Koert F.D. Kuhlmann , Wouter K.G. Leclercq , Arjen M. Rijken , Mike S.L. Liem , Johannes H.W. de Wilt , Joost M. Klaase , Thiery Chapelle , Dirk J. Grünhagen , I. Quintus Molenaar , Ronald R.M. van Dam , Anne M. May , Cornelis J.A. Punt , Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
{"title":"Resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases by an expert panel: Potential impact on hospitals referring patients for local treatment","authors":"Marinde J.G. Bond ,&nbsp;Cornelis Verhoef ,&nbsp;Geert Kazemier ,&nbsp;Niels F.M. Kok ,&nbsp;Michael F. Gerhards ,&nbsp;Koert F.D. Kuhlmann ,&nbsp;Wouter K.G. Leclercq ,&nbsp;Arjen M. Rijken ,&nbsp;Mike S.L. Liem ,&nbsp;Johannes H.W. de Wilt ,&nbsp;Joost M. Klaase ,&nbsp;Thiery Chapelle ,&nbsp;Dirk J. Grünhagen ,&nbsp;I. Quintus Molenaar ,&nbsp;Ronald R.M. van Dam ,&nbsp;Anne M. May ,&nbsp;Cornelis J.A. Punt ,&nbsp;Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM) eligible for local treatment (resection/ablation) do not always receive this potentially curative treatment due to the lack of clear resectability criteria and expertise in centres not performing liver surgery. We evaluated the potential value of a liver expert panel in daily practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients with CRLM starting with systemic treatment in centres not performing liver surgery between 2016 and 2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. A panel of liver surgeons retrospectively re-evaluated patients’ imaging for resectability before and two-monthly during systemic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-three patients were included from 24 hospitals requiring a total of 544 resectability assessments by individual panel surgeons. The panel considered 18 (29 %) patients to have resectable CRLM before starting systemic treatment, which increased to 43 (68 %) after up to three evaluations. Eighteen (29 %) patients considered resectable by the panel at any time received no local treatment of whom 9 (50 %) were not referred to a liver surgeon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In non-liver-surgery centres, over a quarter of patients technically eligible for local treatment of initially unresectable CRLM, sometimes mistakenly categorised as such, did not receive this. This stresses the need for liver expert panels in daily practice to increase local treatment rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 109681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074879832500109X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM) eligible for local treatment (resection/ablation) do not always receive this potentially curative treatment due to the lack of clear resectability criteria and expertise in centres not performing liver surgery. We evaluated the potential value of a liver expert panel in daily practice.

Methods

All patients with CRLM starting with systemic treatment in centres not performing liver surgery between 2016 and 2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. A panel of liver surgeons retrospectively re-evaluated patients’ imaging for resectability before and two-monthly during systemic treatment.

Results

Sixty-three patients were included from 24 hospitals requiring a total of 544 resectability assessments by individual panel surgeons. The panel considered 18 (29 %) patients to have resectable CRLM before starting systemic treatment, which increased to 43 (68 %) after up to three evaluations. Eighteen (29 %) patients considered resectable by the panel at any time received no local treatment of whom 9 (50 %) were not referred to a liver surgeon.

Conclusion

In non-liver-surgery centres, over a quarter of patients technically eligible for local treatment of initially unresectable CRLM, sometimes mistakenly categorised as such, did not receive this. This stresses the need for liver expert panels in daily practice to increase local treatment rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家小组对结直肠癌肝转移的可切除性评估:对医院转介患者进行局部治疗的潜在影响
背景:适合局部治疗(切除/消融)的仅结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者并不总是接受这种潜在的治愈治疗,因为不进行肝脏手术的中心缺乏明确的可切除性标准和专业知识。我们评估了肝脏专家小组在日常实践中的潜在价值。方法2016年至2020年期间,所有在非肝脏手术中心开始全身治疗的CRLM患者在荷兰癌症登记处被确定。一组肝脏外科医生回顾性地重新评估患者在全身治疗前和两个月期间的可切除性影像学。结果纳入来自24家医院的63例患者,共进行544次可切除性评估。专家组认为18例(29%)患者在开始全身治疗前有可切除的CRLM,在多达三次评估后增加到43例(68%)。18例(29%)被专家组认为可切除的患者在任何时候都没有接受局部治疗,其中9例(50%)没有转诊给肝脏外科医生。结论:在非肝脏手术中心,超过四分之一的患者在技术上符合最初不可切除的CRLM的局部治疗条件,有时被错误地归类为这样,没有得到这种治疗。这强调了肝脏专家小组在日常实践中提高当地治疗率的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Trends and future of the disease burden of malignant neoplasms of bone and articular cartilage in China from 1990 to 2023: An analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease 2023 Hepatobiliary surgical training in a changing educational landscape: An 18-year longitudinal analysis of a high-volume international fellowship programme Tumour localization and oncological outcomes in nonuterine leiomyosarcoma of the abdomen and pelvis Factors influencing surgical decision-making in breast cancer: A multicenter study in Japan The utility of large language models in oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1