Resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases by an expert panel: Potential impact on hospitals referring patients for local treatment

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109681
Marinde J.G. Bond , Cornelis Verhoef , Geert Kazemier , Niels F.M. Kok , Michael F. Gerhards , Koert F.D. Kuhlmann , Wouter K.G. Leclercq , Arjen M. Rijken , Mike S.L. Liem , Johannes H.W. de Wilt , Joost M. Klaase , Thiery Chapelle , Dirk J. Grünhagen , I. Quintus Molenaar , Ronald R.M. van Dam , Anne M. May , Cornelis J.A. Punt , Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
{"title":"Resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases by an expert panel: Potential impact on hospitals referring patients for local treatment","authors":"Marinde J.G. Bond ,&nbsp;Cornelis Verhoef ,&nbsp;Geert Kazemier ,&nbsp;Niels F.M. Kok ,&nbsp;Michael F. Gerhards ,&nbsp;Koert F.D. Kuhlmann ,&nbsp;Wouter K.G. Leclercq ,&nbsp;Arjen M. Rijken ,&nbsp;Mike S.L. Liem ,&nbsp;Johannes H.W. de Wilt ,&nbsp;Joost M. Klaase ,&nbsp;Thiery Chapelle ,&nbsp;Dirk J. Grünhagen ,&nbsp;I. Quintus Molenaar ,&nbsp;Ronald R.M. van Dam ,&nbsp;Anne M. May ,&nbsp;Cornelis J.A. Punt ,&nbsp;Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM) eligible for local treatment (resection/ablation) do not always receive this potentially curative treatment due to the lack of clear resectability criteria and expertise in centres not performing liver surgery. We evaluated the potential value of a liver expert panel in daily practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients with CRLM starting with systemic treatment in centres not performing liver surgery between 2016 and 2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. A panel of liver surgeons retrospectively re-evaluated patients’ imaging for resectability before and two-monthly during systemic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-three patients were included from 24 hospitals requiring a total of 544 resectability assessments by individual panel surgeons. The panel considered 18 (29 %) patients to have resectable CRLM before starting systemic treatment, which increased to 43 (68 %) after up to three evaluations. Eighteen (29 %) patients considered resectable by the panel at any time received no local treatment of whom 9 (50 %) were not referred to a liver surgeon.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In non-liver-surgery centres, over a quarter of patients technically eligible for local treatment of initially unresectable CRLM, sometimes mistakenly categorised as such, did not receive this. This stresses the need for liver expert panels in daily practice to increase local treatment rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 109681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074879832500109X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM) eligible for local treatment (resection/ablation) do not always receive this potentially curative treatment due to the lack of clear resectability criteria and expertise in centres not performing liver surgery. We evaluated the potential value of a liver expert panel in daily practice.

Methods

All patients with CRLM starting with systemic treatment in centres not performing liver surgery between 2016 and 2020 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. A panel of liver surgeons retrospectively re-evaluated patients’ imaging for resectability before and two-monthly during systemic treatment.

Results

Sixty-three patients were included from 24 hospitals requiring a total of 544 resectability assessments by individual panel surgeons. The panel considered 18 (29 %) patients to have resectable CRLM before starting systemic treatment, which increased to 43 (68 %) after up to three evaluations. Eighteen (29 %) patients considered resectable by the panel at any time received no local treatment of whom 9 (50 %) were not referred to a liver surgeon.

Conclusion

In non-liver-surgery centres, over a quarter of patients technically eligible for local treatment of initially unresectable CRLM, sometimes mistakenly categorised as such, did not receive this. This stresses the need for liver expert panels in daily practice to increase local treatment rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of combined surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy and postoperative PVC for hepatocellular carcinoma with mPVTT Diagnostic performance of fluorescent lymphography-guided lymph node dissection during minimally invasive gastrectomy following chemotherapy Long-term survival analysis after radical gastrectomy for Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: A multicenter study Simultaneous versus delayed resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis Successful pregnancy following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal malignancies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1