Effects of emotional expression and platform prompts on patient selection: A multi-method study on online question and answer platforms

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117868
Jiaxin Xue , Zhaohua Deng , Bin Wang
{"title":"Effects of emotional expression and platform prompts on patient selection: A multi-method study on online question and answer platforms","authors":"Jiaxin Xue ,&nbsp;Zhaohua Deng ,&nbsp;Bin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patients lacking medical expertise in online health Q&amp;A platforms find it difficult to assess the quality of physician responses. Emotional support provided by doctors and prompts from the platform may influence patient selection.</div><div>We developed a conceptual model based on emotions as social information theory and the Stimulus-Organism-Response framework. The model was validated using a multi-method and multi-study approach. In Study 1, we analyzed platform data using natural language processing and machine learning techniques to explore the impacts of physician expression characteristics on patient selection. In Study 2, we conducted an experiment to explore patient perceptions and influence mechanisms in the process.</div><div>Study 1 showed the effects of empathy, encouragement, and using default responses on patient selection. Study 2 revealed the importance of psychological empowerment and uniqueness neglect on patient decisions. The findings have significant implications for physicians and platforms in designing improved health services and optimizing systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"370 ","pages":"Article 117868"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients lacking medical expertise in online health Q&A platforms find it difficult to assess the quality of physician responses. Emotional support provided by doctors and prompts from the platform may influence patient selection.
We developed a conceptual model based on emotions as social information theory and the Stimulus-Organism-Response framework. The model was validated using a multi-method and multi-study approach. In Study 1, we analyzed platform data using natural language processing and machine learning techniques to explore the impacts of physician expression characteristics on patient selection. In Study 2, we conducted an experiment to explore patient perceptions and influence mechanisms in the process.
Study 1 showed the effects of empathy, encouragement, and using default responses on patient selection. Study 2 revealed the importance of psychological empowerment and uniqueness neglect on patient decisions. The findings have significant implications for physicians and platforms in designing improved health services and optimizing systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
“The system's not getting my grandchild”: A qualitative study of caregiver relationship formation for children born to incarcerated mothers Natural disaster-induced dementia and cognitive decline: A meta-analysis and systematic review Disputed and disfavored: Pain, mental illness, and invisible conditions in disability discrimination cases The power paradox of patient-centred care in Chinese community health: Towards a conceptualisation Effects of emotional expression and platform prompts on patient selection: A multi-method study on online question and answer platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1