New strategies for non-targeted quantification in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: The potential of reconstructed TIC response factor surfaces

IF 4 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Chromatography A Pub Date : 2025-04-26 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465811
Jason Devers, David I. Pattison, Asger B. Hansen, Jan H. Christensen
{"title":"New strategies for non-targeted quantification in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: The potential of reconstructed TIC response factor surfaces","authors":"Jason Devers,&nbsp;David I. Pattison,&nbsp;Asger B. Hansen,&nbsp;Jan H. Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) offers unrivaled peak capacity and the ability to resolve and characterize hundreds to thousands of compounds within complex environmental samples. Knowledge of their concentrations is essential in assessing their toxicological and regulatory relevance; however, reliable quantification typically requires concurrent analysis of an authentic standard for each compound. Response factors (RF) may be used to estimate the concentration of a compound without the need for its respective standard, but this is not routinely employed in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). This study demonstrates that GC × GC offers a new opportunity for the calculation of RFs and estimating a compounds concentration via the creation of 2D total ion current (TIC) response factor surfaces (RFS). A new method, linking a compounds retention time coordinate to its RF using a reconstructed TIC approach, was used to calculate the concentration of 27 compounds in both solvent and effluent wastewater matrix. Using both suspect screening and non-targeted methodologies, average fold change errors of 1.58 and 1.83 respectively were determined for the novel RFS approach. The approach was compared to an RF prediction model utilizing molecular descriptors, using a genetic algorithm, partial least squares regression (GA-PLS) model. The accuracy of the RFS method demonstrates its potential in the fields of suspect screening and non-targeted analysis, where realistic concentration estimates are required. The RFS approach delivers comparable accuracy in concentration prediction compared to computational approaches for determining RFs, but crucially, without the need for generating molecular descriptors or acquiring a reference standard. Additionally, a purely non-targeted approach outlined can allow for the calculation of RF for features without the need for identification or a reference spectrum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1747 ","pages":"Article 465811"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325001591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) offers unrivaled peak capacity and the ability to resolve and characterize hundreds to thousands of compounds within complex environmental samples. Knowledge of their concentrations is essential in assessing their toxicological and regulatory relevance; however, reliable quantification typically requires concurrent analysis of an authentic standard for each compound. Response factors (RF) may be used to estimate the concentration of a compound without the need for its respective standard, but this is not routinely employed in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). This study demonstrates that GC × GC offers a new opportunity for the calculation of RFs and estimating a compounds concentration via the creation of 2D total ion current (TIC) response factor surfaces (RFS). A new method, linking a compounds retention time coordinate to its RF using a reconstructed TIC approach, was used to calculate the concentration of 27 compounds in both solvent and effluent wastewater matrix. Using both suspect screening and non-targeted methodologies, average fold change errors of 1.58 and 1.83 respectively were determined for the novel RFS approach. The approach was compared to an RF prediction model utilizing molecular descriptors, using a genetic algorithm, partial least squares regression (GA-PLS) model. The accuracy of the RFS method demonstrates its potential in the fields of suspect screening and non-targeted analysis, where realistic concentration estimates are required. The RFS approach delivers comparable accuracy in concentration prediction compared to computational approaches for determining RFs, but crucially, without the need for generating molecular descriptors or acquiring a reference standard. Additionally, a purely non-targeted approach outlined can allow for the calculation of RF for features without the need for identification or a reference spectrum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合二维气相色谱法非靶向定量的新策略:重建TIC响应因子面的潜力
全面的二维气相色谱(GC × GC)提供了无与伦比的峰值容量和解决和表征复杂环境样品中数百到数千种化合物的能力。了解它们的浓度对于评估它们的毒理学和监管相关性至关重要;然而,可靠的定量通常需要同时分析每种化合物的真实标准。响应因子(RF)可以用来估计化合物的浓度,而不需要相应的标准,但这在气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)中并不常用。本研究表明,GC × GC为计算RFs和通过创建二维总离子电流(TIC)响应因子面(RFs)来估计化合物浓度提供了新的机会。采用一种新的方法,将化合物的保留时间坐标与其RF连接起来,利用重建的TIC方法计算了27种化合物在溶剂和废水基质中的浓度。使用可疑筛选和非靶向方法,新RFS方法的平均折叠变化误差分别为1.58和1.83。将该方法与利用分子描述符、遗传算法、偏最小二乘回归(GA-PLS)模型的射频预测模型进行了比较。RFS方法的准确性证明了它在可疑筛选和非目标分析领域的潜力,在这些领域需要实际的浓度估计。与确定RFS的计算方法相比,RFS方法在浓度预测方面提供了相当的准确性,但关键的是,不需要生成分子描述符或获取参考标准。此外,概述的纯非目标方法可以在不需要识别或参考频谱的情况下计算特征的RF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Quantification of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxystyrene migrating from organic materials in contact with drinking water: True occurrence or analytical artefact? Imidazolium-based ionic conjugated microporous polymer as a versatile SPE adsorbent for trace triazine herbicides in water and juice samples Practical considerations for optimizing untargeted metabolomics with Synapt XS HRMS: A tutorial Uncovering the origin of impurities in supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry QSRR-based insights into the chromatographic behaviour of phenolic derivatives on biomimetic stationary phases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1