Extreme surgery using the hypothermic perfusion technique for conventionally unresectable abdominal malignant tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Extreme surgery using the hypothermic perfusion technique is often the only treatment option to achieve R0 resection and long-term prognosis for abdominal tumours that are either conventionally unresectable or contraindicated to allotransplantation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to delineate the indications and outcomes of extreme surgery.

Materials and methods

Human studies on extreme resection for abdominal malignant tumours were searched among five databases between January 1988 to March 2023. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed, pooling 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates.

Results

This study comprised 73 studies encompassing 333 patients who underwent extreme liver resection (in situ, n = 127; ante situm, n = 72; ex situ, n = 134). Additionally, 90 patients from 17 studies focusing on extreme resection of other (non-hepatic) organs were included. The pooled 90-day mortality and 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 7.3 %, 72.3 % and 23.4 %, respectively. The 1- and 5-year recurrence rates were 38.7 % and 86.1 %, respectively. Patients aged <65 years had a significantly lower 90-day mortality (5.5 % vs. 29.6 %; P = 0.022) and a higher 5-year overall survival rate (23.9 % vs. 0 %; P < 0.001) than those aged ≥65 years. Additionally, non-epithelial tumours were associated with favourable prognosis compared with epithelial tumours.

Conclusion

Extreme surgery offers acceptable outcomes for younger patients with non-epithelial tumours that are either unresectable by conventional cancer surgery or contraindicated to allotransplantation.