Large-scale building-level electricity consumption estimation for multiple building types: A case study from Dongguan, China

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106224
Geng Liu , Jinpei Ou , Yue Zheng , Yaotong Cai , Xiaoping Liu , Honghui Zhang
{"title":"Large-scale building-level electricity consumption estimation for multiple building types: A case study from Dongguan, China","authors":"Geng Liu ,&nbsp;Jinpei Ou ,&nbsp;Yue Zheng ,&nbsp;Yaotong Cai ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Liu ,&nbsp;Honghui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of building electricity consumption (BEC) is essential for sustainable urban development and effective energy management. Existing methods, which rely on using physical models or small-scale surveys, often lack the accuracy and reliability required to provide meaningful insights at the city-scale building level. To address this gap, we introduce a data-driven framework combining electricity consumption data from meters with building footprint data. This framework, implemented in the megacity of Dongguan, China, utilizes five advanced machine learning algorithms to estimate BEC for residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. Our results show that the random forest (RF) model outperforms other algorithms, with building volume identified as the primary predictor. Spatially, residential BEC decreases from urban centers to suburban and rural areas, while commercial BEC exhibits polarization, with high concentrations in central urban areas and key commercial towns. Although industrial BEC is widespread, it shows localized high-consumption clusters. At the community level, BEC patterns exhibit strong spatial autocorrelation, with distinct hot spots and cold spots observed for residential, commercial, and industrial BEC, despite significant variations in their spatial distributions. Both total BEC and BEC intensity exhibit log-normal distribution characteristics across building types. In terms of median BEC intensity, commercial and industrial buildings consume 3.2 times and 5 times more electricity per unit area, respectively, compared to residential buildings. This study advances the accurate estimation of BEC at the building level for multiple building types within a Chinese megacity, providing valuable insights for sustainable urban planning and energy efficiency policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 106224"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725001015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of building electricity consumption (BEC) is essential for sustainable urban development and effective energy management. Existing methods, which rely on using physical models or small-scale surveys, often lack the accuracy and reliability required to provide meaningful insights at the city-scale building level. To address this gap, we introduce a data-driven framework combining electricity consumption data from meters with building footprint data. This framework, implemented in the megacity of Dongguan, China, utilizes five advanced machine learning algorithms to estimate BEC for residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. Our results show that the random forest (RF) model outperforms other algorithms, with building volume identified as the primary predictor. Spatially, residential BEC decreases from urban centers to suburban and rural areas, while commercial BEC exhibits polarization, with high concentrations in central urban areas and key commercial towns. Although industrial BEC is widespread, it shows localized high-consumption clusters. At the community level, BEC patterns exhibit strong spatial autocorrelation, with distinct hot spots and cold spots observed for residential, commercial, and industrial BEC, despite significant variations in their spatial distributions. Both total BEC and BEC intensity exhibit log-normal distribution characteristics across building types. In terms of median BEC intensity, commercial and industrial buildings consume 3.2 times and 5 times more electricity per unit area, respectively, compared to residential buildings. This study advances the accurate estimation of BEC at the building level for multiple building types within a Chinese megacity, providing valuable insights for sustainable urban planning and energy efficiency policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多建筑类型的大规模建筑级用电量估算——以东莞市为例
建筑用电量的准确估算对城市可持续发展和有效的能源管理至关重要。现有的方法依赖于使用物理模型或小规模调查,往往缺乏在城市规模建筑层面提供有意义的见解所需的准确性和可靠性。为了解决这一差距,我们引入了一个数据驱动的框架,将电表的用电量数据与建筑足迹数据相结合。该框架在中国的大城市东莞实施,利用五种先进的机器学习算法来估计住宅、商业和工业建筑的BEC。我们的研究结果表明,随机森林(RF)模型优于其他算法,建筑体积被确定为主要预测因子。从空间上看,住宅型BEC从城市中心向郊区和农村地区减少,而商业型BEC则呈现两极化趋势,在中心城区和重点商业城镇高度集中。工业BEC虽然普遍存在,但呈现局部高消费集群。在群落水平上,居民、商业和工业的BEC格局表现出较强的空间自相关性,尽管其空间分布存在显著差异,但仍存在明显的热点和冷点。总BEC和BEC强度在不同建筑类型间均呈现对数正态分布特征。从BEC强度中位数来看,商业和工业建筑单位面积用电量分别是住宅的3.2倍和5倍。本研究对中国特大城市内多种建筑类型的建筑层面的BEC进行了准确估计,为可持续城市规划和能效政策提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
期刊最新文献
Revealing the impact of multi-scale innovation networks on urban carbon emission intensity: Evidence from Chinese cities Mapping geosystem services potential for urban climate resilience: A case study from Malmö, Sweden Beat the heat: Hotspots for nature-based solutions in Vienna and Budapest Urban resilience through nature-based solutions in an era of environmental extremes: A global systematic analysis Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban flood resilience in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1