{"title":"Effect of different mapping units, spatial resolutions, and machine learning algorithms on landslide susceptibility mapping at the township scale","authors":"Xiaokang Liu, Shuai Shao, Chen Zhang, Shengjun Shao","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12148-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the 1:10,000 geohazard hazard evaluation in Northwest China, the delineation of geohazard hazard zoning has begun to shift to the township scale. This study aims to reveal the impacts of three important uncertainty issues in landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP) at the township scale: mapping units, spatial resolutions, and selection of machine learning algorithms. Taking Chengguan town of Guanghe County, China as an example, the landslide inventory and 9 important conditioning factors were acquired. The normalized frequency ratios of each conditioning factor were calculated under the raster unit at seven resolutions (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 m) and the slope unit. Four machine learning models [random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machines (SVM), and naive Bayes (NB)] were applied for LSP modeling. The results indicate that slope unit-based models effectively differentiate high- and low-susceptibility zones. In contrast, for raster units, the AUC values of all models significantly improve as the cell size increases from 1 to 30 m, and the mean and standard deviation of the landslide susceptibility index accordingly decrease and increase, respectively. The LSP performance of the four machine learning models in the study region from high to low is RF, MLP, SVM, and NB. In addition, the overlay analysis of landslide susceptibility maps and historical landslides shows that the RF model based on 15 m resolution raster units can obtain the best landslide susceptibility map for the study area. These findings provide critical insights for optimizing landslide susceptibility assessments in township-scale applications, particularly within loess hill regions of Northwest China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12148-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the 1:10,000 geohazard hazard evaluation in Northwest China, the delineation of geohazard hazard zoning has begun to shift to the township scale. This study aims to reveal the impacts of three important uncertainty issues in landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP) at the township scale: mapping units, spatial resolutions, and selection of machine learning algorithms. Taking Chengguan town of Guanghe County, China as an example, the landslide inventory and 9 important conditioning factors were acquired. The normalized frequency ratios of each conditioning factor were calculated under the raster unit at seven resolutions (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 m) and the slope unit. Four machine learning models [random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machines (SVM), and naive Bayes (NB)] were applied for LSP modeling. The results indicate that slope unit-based models effectively differentiate high- and low-susceptibility zones. In contrast, for raster units, the AUC values of all models significantly improve as the cell size increases from 1 to 30 m, and the mean and standard deviation of the landslide susceptibility index accordingly decrease and increase, respectively. The LSP performance of the four machine learning models in the study region from high to low is RF, MLP, SVM, and NB. In addition, the overlay analysis of landslide susceptibility maps and historical landslides shows that the RF model based on 15 m resolution raster units can obtain the best landslide susceptibility map for the study area. These findings provide critical insights for optimizing landslide susceptibility assessments in township-scale applications, particularly within loess hill regions of Northwest China.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.