Detection of substantial numbers of latent tuberculosis and positive hepatitis B serology results in rheumatology patients preparing to receive intensified immunosuppressive therapy in a low-prevalence country: why screening still matters.
Martin Feuchtenberger, Magdolna Szilvia Kovacs, Axel Nigg, Arne Schäfer
{"title":"Detection of substantial numbers of latent tuberculosis and positive hepatitis B serology results in rheumatology patients preparing to receive intensified immunosuppressive therapy in a low-prevalence country: why screening still matters.","authors":"Martin Feuchtenberger, Magdolna Szilvia Kovacs, Axel Nigg, Arne Schäfer","doi":"10.1007/s10067-025-07350-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction /objectives: </strong>International guidelines recommend screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and chronic viral hepatitis infections before initiating intensified immunosuppressive therapy. We assessed the prevalence of positive screening tests for LTBI, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients screened at a large rheumatology outpatient center in Germany.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from adult rheumatology patients. The presence of LTBI was evaluated by chest X-rays, patient medical history/self-report, and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT) interferon-gamma release assays. Antibodies to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) and HCV were used to assess HBV and HCV, respectively. Statistically significant associations were evaluated by Fisher exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 697 screened patients with a rheumatological condition (61.3% female, mean age 60.0 years), 132 (18.9%) patients were positive for LTBI (99 [14.2%]), anti-HBc (39 [5.6%]), or anti-HCV (3 [0.4%]). Nine patients had more than one positive result; different infections were not significantly associated. QFT detected the most LTBI cases (59.5%) followed by patient report/history (42.4%) and chest X-rays (17.2%). Although most patients (83.8%) were positive on only one test, associations among LTBI tests were statistically significant. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) use was lower in patients with a positive LTBI screening result compared with all screened patients (73.7% vs 86.4%) and targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) use was higher (10.1% vs 5.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Almost one-fifth of rheumatology patients preparing to initiate intensified immunosuppressive therapy have positive results on screening tests for LTBI or show evidence of exposure to HBV or HCV. These findings support the need for careful screening, even in \"low-prevalence\" countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1851-1859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07350-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction /objectives: International guidelines recommend screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and chronic viral hepatitis infections before initiating intensified immunosuppressive therapy. We assessed the prevalence of positive screening tests for LTBI, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients screened at a large rheumatology outpatient center in Germany.
Method: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from adult rheumatology patients. The presence of LTBI was evaluated by chest X-rays, patient medical history/self-report, and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT) interferon-gamma release assays. Antibodies to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) and HCV were used to assess HBV and HCV, respectively. Statistically significant associations were evaluated by Fisher exact tests.
Results: Of 697 screened patients with a rheumatological condition (61.3% female, mean age 60.0 years), 132 (18.9%) patients were positive for LTBI (99 [14.2%]), anti-HBc (39 [5.6%]), or anti-HCV (3 [0.4%]). Nine patients had more than one positive result; different infections were not significantly associated. QFT detected the most LTBI cases (59.5%) followed by patient report/history (42.4%) and chest X-rays (17.2%). Although most patients (83.8%) were positive on only one test, associations among LTBI tests were statistically significant. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) use was lower in patients with a positive LTBI screening result compared with all screened patients (73.7% vs 86.4%) and targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) use was higher (10.1% vs 5.9%).
Conclusions: Almost one-fifth of rheumatology patients preparing to initiate intensified immunosuppressive therapy have positive results on screening tests for LTBI or show evidence of exposure to HBV or HCV. These findings support the need for careful screening, even in "low-prevalence" countries.
介绍/目的:国际指南推荐在开始强化免疫抑制治疗之前筛查潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)和慢性病毒性肝炎感染。我们评估了在德国一家大型风湿病门诊中心筛查的患者中LTBI、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)阳性筛查试验的流行程度。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用成人风湿病患者的电子健康记录。通过胸部x光片、患者病史/自我报告和QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT)干扰素γ释放测定来评估LTBI的存在。HBV核心抗原抗体(抗- hbc)和HCV抗体分别用于评估HBV和HCV。采用Fisher精确检验评估统计学上显著的相关性。结果:在697例筛查的风湿病患者中(61.3%为女性,平均年龄60.0岁),132例(18.9%)患者LTBI(99例[14.2%])、抗hbc(39例[5.6%])或抗hcv(3例[0.4%])阳性。9例患者出现不止一次阳性结果;不同感染间无显著相关性。QFT检出的LTBI病例最多(59.5%),其次是患者报告/病史(42.4%)和胸部x光片(17.2%)。尽管大多数患者(83.8%)仅在一项检测中呈阳性,但LTBI检测之间的相关性具有统计学意义。LTBI筛查结果阳性的患者使用生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(bDMARD)的比例低于所有筛查患者(73.7% vs 86.4%),而靶向合成DMARD (tsDMARD)的使用比例较高(10.1% vs 5.9%)。结论:几乎五分之一准备开始强化免疫抑制治疗的风湿病患者在LTBI筛查试验中有阳性结果或显示暴露于HBV或HCV的证据。这些发现支持了仔细筛查的必要性,即使在“低流行率”国家也是如此。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level.
The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.