Comparison of the perinatal outcomes of live-born singletons between blastocysts and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles via propensity score matching.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07347-z
Yaqiong Zeng, Juan Chen, Heying Zhang, Xiaowei Nie, Yong Tan, Yanyun Yin
{"title":"Comparison of the perinatal outcomes of live-born singletons between blastocysts and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles via propensity score matching.","authors":"Yaqiong Zeng, Juan Chen, Heying Zhang, Xiaowei Nie, Yong Tan, Yanyun Yin","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07347-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In previous studies, the incidences of premature births and large for newborn gestational age (LGA ) infants were higher with blastocyst transfer than with cleavage-stage embryo transfer in infants conceived via frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. However, those previous studies reported unbalanced baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and the cleavage embryo transfer group. Therefore, in this study, we used propensity score matching to compare the birth weight and newborn gestational age of live-born singletons between blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 to April 2023, 706 cases of singleton delivery resulting from FET cycles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study, of which 180 cases resulted from cleavage embryo transfer and 526 cases resulted from blastocyst transfer. Using propensity score matching, we obtained a well-balanced cohort with 173 pairs of cases. We compared the neonatal perinatal outcomes of this cohort, including birth weight and newborn gestational age, which are the primary outcomes. Moreover, we used multivariate linear regression to analyze whether the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was correlated with neonatal birth weight or newborn gestational age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in any of the baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and cleavage-stage embryo transfer group. There were also no differences between the two groups in terms of the mean birth weight (g) (3380 [3050,3665] vs. 3380 [3002.5,3650], p = 0.941), newborn gestational age (days) (275 [269,280] vs. 275 [270,281], p = 0.282) or other perinatal outcomes. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was not correlated with neonatal birth weight or gestational age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blastocyst transfer had perinatal outcomes similar to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer for live-born singletons in FET cycles and did not influence the mean birth weight or gestational age of the neonates.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07347-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In previous studies, the incidences of premature births and large for newborn gestational age (LGA ) infants were higher with blastocyst transfer than with cleavage-stage embryo transfer in infants conceived via frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. However, those previous studies reported unbalanced baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and the cleavage embryo transfer group. Therefore, in this study, we used propensity score matching to compare the birth weight and newborn gestational age of live-born singletons between blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles.

Methods: From January 2018 to April 2023, 706 cases of singleton delivery resulting from FET cycles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study, of which 180 cases resulted from cleavage embryo transfer and 526 cases resulted from blastocyst transfer. Using propensity score matching, we obtained a well-balanced cohort with 173 pairs of cases. We compared the neonatal perinatal outcomes of this cohort, including birth weight and newborn gestational age, which are the primary outcomes. Moreover, we used multivariate linear regression to analyze whether the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was correlated with neonatal birth weight or newborn gestational age.

Results: After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in any of the baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and cleavage-stage embryo transfer group. There were also no differences between the two groups in terms of the mean birth weight (g) (3380 [3050,3665] vs. 3380 [3002.5,3650], p = 0.941), newborn gestational age (days) (275 [269,280] vs. 275 [270,281], p = 0.282) or other perinatal outcomes. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was not correlated with neonatal birth weight or gestational age.

Conclusions: Blastocyst transfer had perinatal outcomes similar to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer for live-born singletons in FET cycles and did not influence the mean birth weight or gestational age of the neonates.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过倾向得分匹配比较 FET 周期中囊胚和裂殖期胚胎移植的活产单胎围产期结局。
背景:在以往的研究中,通过冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期受孕的婴儿中,囊胚移植比卵裂期胚胎移植的早产和大新生儿胎龄(LGA)婴儿的发生率更高。然而,先前的研究报告了囊胚移植组和卵裂胚胎移植组之间不平衡的基线特征。因此,在本研究中,我们使用倾向评分匹配来比较FET周期中囊胚和卵裂期胚胎移植的活产单胎的出生体重和新生儿胎龄。方法:2018年1月至2023年4月,选取符合纳入和排除标准的FET周期单胎分娩706例,其中卵裂胚胎移植180例,囊胚移植526例。使用倾向评分匹配,我们获得了173对病例的平衡良好的队列。我们比较了该队列的新生儿围产期结局,包括出生体重和新生儿胎龄,这是主要结局。此外,我们使用多元线性回归分析在FET周期中移植的胚胎类型是否与新生儿出生体重或新生儿胎龄相关。结果:倾向评分匹配后,囊胚移植组和卵裂期胚胎移植组在任何基线特征上均无显著差异。两组在平均出生体重(g)(3380[3050,3665]对3380 [3002.5,3650],p = 0.941)、新生儿胎龄(天)(275[269,280]对275 [270,281],p = 0.282)及其他围产期结局方面也无差异。多元线性回归分析显示,在FET周期中移植的胚胎类型与新生儿出生体重或胎龄无关。结论:在FET周期中,对活产单胎进行囊胚移植的围产期结局与卵裂期胚胎移植相似,且不影响新生儿的平均出生体重或胎龄。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Associations between maternal circulating vitamin K isoforms and adverse pregnancy events. Impact of employment on maternal mental health during pregnancy: evidence from a Korean prospective cohort. Evaluation of the APRI score and blood-count-derived inflammatory markers in patients with preeclampsia. Obstetric, perineal, and psychosocial outcomes after successful vaginismus treatment: a retrospective cohort study stratified by Lamont grade. Acute postpartum uterine inversion with successful manual transvaginal repositioning: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1