Nasal or Submandibular Intubation for Anesthesia in Orthognathic Surgery to Correct Jaw Deformities Secondary to Cleft Lip and Palate: Which One Is the Optimal Choice?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-04729-8
Yifan Wu, Han Ge, Heyou Gao, Zihang Zhou, Bin Ye, Jihua Li
{"title":"Nasal or Submandibular Intubation for Anesthesia in Orthognathic Surgery to Correct Jaw Deformities Secondary to Cleft Lip and Palate: Which One Is the Optimal Choice?","authors":"Yifan Wu,&nbsp;Han Ge,&nbsp;Heyou Gao,&nbsp;Zihang Zhou,&nbsp;Bin Ye,&nbsp;Jihua Li","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04729-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the optimal airway management of orthognathic surgery anesthesia for correcting jaw deformity secondary to cleft lip and palate (CLP) by comparing the differences between nasal and submandibular intubation. Preoperative (T0), 1 week postoperatively (T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2) CT scans and vital signs after oral intubation (S0), before reconnection of the submandibular tracheal catheter (S1), and after reconnection (S2) were collected from 54 patients who received nasal intubation (Group I) and submandibular intubation (Group II). The results were evaluated using 3D reconstruction and analysis in Mimics. During the follow-up, all patients demonstrated satisfactory facial shape and stable occlusion and no significant complications were observed. In Group II, maxillary operation duration and blood loss were significantly reduced (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), and nasal septum deviation was distinctly improved (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Both groups exhibited increased nasal alar width, but Group I particularly females showed greater changes (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Only 2 patients (6%) in Group II developed hypertrophic scars 6 months postoperatively. This study demonstrates that submandibular intubation anesthesia represents a straightforward, safe and less complicated technique in orthognathic surgery for CLP patients. Nevertheless, this method should be carefully chosen for patients with scar constitution.</p><p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":"49 9","pages":"2357 - 2365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04729-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the optimal airway management of orthognathic surgery anesthesia for correcting jaw deformity secondary to cleft lip and palate (CLP) by comparing the differences between nasal and submandibular intubation. Preoperative (T0), 1 week postoperatively (T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2) CT scans and vital signs after oral intubation (S0), before reconnection of the submandibular tracheal catheter (S1), and after reconnection (S2) were collected from 54 patients who received nasal intubation (Group I) and submandibular intubation (Group II). The results were evaluated using 3D reconstruction and analysis in Mimics. During the follow-up, all patients demonstrated satisfactory facial shape and stable occlusion and no significant complications were observed. In Group II, maxillary operation duration and blood loss were significantly reduced (P < 0.001), and nasal septum deviation was distinctly improved (P < 0.001). Both groups exhibited increased nasal alar width, but Group I particularly females showed greater changes (P < 0.05). Only 2 patients (6%) in Group II developed hypertrophic scars 6 months postoperatively. This study demonstrates that submandibular intubation anesthesia represents a straightforward, safe and less complicated technique in orthognathic surgery for CLP patients. Nevertheless, this method should be carefully chosen for patients with scar constitution.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在矫正唇腭裂继发颌骨畸形的正颌外科手术中使用鼻腔插管还是下颌下腺插管进行麻醉?哪一种是最佳选择?
本回顾性研究的目的是通过比较鼻插管和下颌下插管的差异,探讨正颌手术麻醉矫正唇腭裂(CLP)颌骨畸形的最佳气道管理。收集54例接受鼻插管(I组)和下颌下插管(II组)的患者,术前(T0)、术后1周(T1)、术后6个月(T2)的CT扫描和口腔插管后(S0)、下颌下气管导管重新连接前(S1)、重新连接后(S2)的生命体征,并在Mimics中进行三维重建和分析。随访期间,所有患者面部形态满意,咬合稳定,无明显并发症。II组上颌手术时间、出血量明显减少(P < 0.001),鼻中隔偏曲明显改善(P < 0.001)。两组的鼻翼宽度均有所增加,但第一组的变化更大(P < 0.05)。II组仅2例(6%)患者术后6个月出现增生性瘢痕。本研究表明,在CLP患者的正颌手术中,下颌下插管麻醉是一种简单、安全且不太复杂的技术。但对于有疤痕体质的患者,应慎重选择此法。证据等级IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Response to Commentary on "Rhinoplasty and the 'Big Five' Model: The Impact of Patients' Personality Traits on Post-surgical Satisfaction Outcomes". Motivations, Concerns, and the Role of Social Media in Upper Blepharoplasty Candidates: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Mapping the Mandibular Lingual Foramina for Safer Chin Surgery: CT Morphometry and Predictive Modeling. Comment on: "Effects of Profhilo Tissue Bioremodeling on Skin Texture and Perioral Wrinkles: A Randomized Controlled Triple-Blind Clinical Trial". Letter in Reply to Comment on: "Pocket Conversion from Prepectoral to Retropectoral Implant Placement in Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-effective Solution for High-Grade Rippling and Implant Visibility".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1