Patient Preferences for Utilization of Telemedicine in Aesthetic Surgery Consultations

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-04749-4
Emily Long, Valeria P. Bustos, Dominick Falcon, Lacey Foster, Ashley Boustany, Samuel Lin
{"title":"Patient Preferences for Utilization of Telemedicine in Aesthetic Surgery Consultations","authors":"Emily Long,&nbsp;Valeria P. Bustos,&nbsp;Dominick Falcon,&nbsp;Lacey Foster,&nbsp;Ashley Boustany,&nbsp;Samuel Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04749-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Telemedicine has been increasingly utilized by plastic surgeons since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic as it minimizes visit time, costs, and viral exposures. However, patient comfort level and preference for telemedicine visits in the aesthetic surgery perioperative period remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient comfort and preferences regarding perioperative telemedicine visits for aesthetic surgery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>An IRB-approved cross-sectional survey was conducted in January 2022 on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform to assess respondents’ comfort and preferences regarding periprocedural telemedicine visits. Survey responses were compared using descriptive and multivariate analyses.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 505 participants (54% male, 46% female; mean age 37.7±11.5 years) completed the survey. The majority of respondents reported feeling either very or somewhat comfortable having their initial consult via telemedicine for both aesthetic surgery (72%) and non-surgical aesthetic procedures (74%). Respondents were most comfortable having an initial telemedicine consult for head and neck procedures, and least comfortable having telemedicine consults for sensitive areas, including the breast and buttocks. Respondents were significantly more comfortable scheduling non-surgical procedures than surgical procedures after a telemedicine consult alone (65% vs 58%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our data suggests that the majority of aesthetic surgery patients are comfortable with having initial consultations via telemedicine. Particularly in young patients seeking non-surgical aesthetic procedures, telemedicine consults alone may be substituted for in-office visits prior to procedural scheduling. However, for operations and procedures requiring physical examination of sensitive areas, including the breasts and gluteal regions, in-person visits remain the preferred modality.</p><h3>Level of Evidence III</h3><p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":"49 15","pages":"4439 - 4446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04749-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Telemedicine has been increasingly utilized by plastic surgeons since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic as it minimizes visit time, costs, and viral exposures. However, patient comfort level and preference for telemedicine visits in the aesthetic surgery perioperative period remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient comfort and preferences regarding perioperative telemedicine visits for aesthetic surgery.

Methods

An IRB-approved cross-sectional survey was conducted in January 2022 on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform to assess respondents’ comfort and preferences regarding periprocedural telemedicine visits. Survey responses were compared using descriptive and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 505 participants (54% male, 46% female; mean age 37.7±11.5 years) completed the survey. The majority of respondents reported feeling either very or somewhat comfortable having their initial consult via telemedicine for both aesthetic surgery (72%) and non-surgical aesthetic procedures (74%). Respondents were most comfortable having an initial telemedicine consult for head and neck procedures, and least comfortable having telemedicine consults for sensitive areas, including the breast and buttocks. Respondents were significantly more comfortable scheduling non-surgical procedures than surgical procedures after a telemedicine consult alone (65% vs 58%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our data suggests that the majority of aesthetic surgery patients are comfortable with having initial consultations via telemedicine. Particularly in young patients seeking non-surgical aesthetic procedures, telemedicine consults alone may be substituted for in-office visits prior to procedural scheduling. However, for operations and procedures requiring physical examination of sensitive areas, including the breasts and gluteal regions, in-person visits remain the preferred modality.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美容手术咨询中使用远程医疗的患者偏好。
目的:自COVID-19大流行开始以来,整形外科医生越来越多地使用远程医疗,因为它可以最大限度地减少就诊时间、成本和病毒暴露。然而,患者舒适度和偏好的远程医疗访问在美容手术围手术期仍然未知。本研究的目的是评估患者对美容手术围手术期远程医疗访问的舒适度和偏好。方法:一项经irb批准的横断面调查于2022年1月在亚马逊的土耳其机械(MTurk)平台上进行,以评估受访者对围手术期远程医疗就诊的舒适度和偏好。使用描述性和多变量分析对调查结果进行比较。结果:共有505名参与者(男性54%,女性46%;平均年龄37.7±11.5岁)完成调查。大多数受访者表示,通过远程医疗对美容手术(72%)和非手术美容程序(74%)进行初步咨询感到非常或有些舒服。答复者对头部和颈部手术进行初步远程医疗咨询感到最自在,对敏感部位(包括乳房和臀部)进行远程医疗咨询感到最不自在。受访者在单独进行远程医疗咨询后,更愿意安排非手术治疗,而不是手术治疗(65% vs 58%;结论:我们的数据表明,大多数美容手术患者对通过远程医疗进行初步咨询感到满意。特别是在寻求非手术美容手术的年轻患者中,远程医疗咨询可以代替手术安排之前的办公室就诊。然而,对于需要对敏感部位(包括乳房和臀部)进行身体检查的手术和程序,亲自就诊仍然是首选方式。证据等级iii:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy Study of Facial Biomechanical A-Type Botox Injection in Reshaping the Jawline. The Outcome of the Reconstructive Procedure Using Buccal Pad of Fat Flap and Deep Plane Facelift after Permanent Filler Removal. Rethinking Skin Preparation: Is Hypochlorous Acid (Clinisept+) a Safe Alternative Skin Preparation in Aesthetic Surgery? ADM-Assisted Breast Reconstruction vs Micro-Polyurethane Foam-Covered Implants in the Prepectoral Space: A Monocentric Study. Medial Limited Midface-Lift-16-Year Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1