Exploring the factors influencing the timely intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: a qualitative interview study using the COM-B model.
Shu Li, Jiani Pan, Yan Xu, Zhengyue Dai, Qiong Fang
{"title":"Exploring the factors influencing the timely intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: a qualitative interview study using the COM-B model.","authors":"Shu Li, Jiani Pan, Yan Xu, Zhengyue Dai, Qiong Fang","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12379-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the factors influencing the untimely receipt of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), based on the capability, opportunity, and motivation-behavior (COM-B) model.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An exploratory qualitative study was conducted with semi-structured interviews with DME patients who had received at least one injection of anti-VEGF therapy within one year. The COM-B model was utilized to guide both data collection and analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes and subthemes were identified. Psychological capability for timely intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment included lack of relevant knowledge and choice of more convenient treatments. Social opportunity included no mention of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and effective doctor-patient communication; physical opportunity included unavailability of anti-VEGF and high treatment costs. Reflective motivation included lack of confidence in the efficacy and unmet expectations; automatic motivation included fear of injections, and fear of blindness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified the facilitators and barriers that influenced the timely intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, which lays the foundation for the development of future interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12379-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the factors influencing the untimely receipt of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), based on the capability, opportunity, and motivation-behavior (COM-B) model.
Design: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted with semi-structured interviews with DME patients who had received at least one injection of anti-VEGF therapy within one year. The COM-B model was utilized to guide both data collection and analysis.
Results: Themes and subthemes were identified. Psychological capability for timely intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment included lack of relevant knowledge and choice of more convenient treatments. Social opportunity included no mention of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and effective doctor-patient communication; physical opportunity included unavailability of anti-VEGF and high treatment costs. Reflective motivation included lack of confidence in the efficacy and unmet expectations; automatic motivation included fear of injections, and fear of blindness.
Conclusion: This study identified the facilitators and barriers that influenced the timely intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, which lays the foundation for the development of future interventions.
期刊介绍:
BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.