A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Biomimetics Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.3390/biomimetics10020072
Mario Ceddia, Luciano Lamberti, Bartolomeo Trentadue
{"title":"A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior.","authors":"Mario Ceddia, Luciano Lamberti, Bartolomeo Trentadue","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics10020072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanical properties of materials for spinal fixation can significantly affect spinal surgical outcomes. Traditional materials such as titanium exhibit high stiffness, which can lead to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. This study investigates the biomechanical performance of titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) in spinal fixation using finite element analysis, through the evaluation of the <i>Shielding Strength Factor</i> (<i>SSF</i>). <b>Methods:</b> A three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) model of an L4/L5 functional spinal unit was developed to simulate the mechanical behavior of three fixation systems: titanium screws and rods (model A), titanium screws with PEEK rods (model B), and PEEK screws and rods (model C). The analysis evaluated stress distribution and load transfer under physiological conditions, in comparison with the intact spine (baseline model). <b>Results</b>: The analysis showed that titanium fixation systems resulted in higher stress shielding effects, with a significant difference in stress distribution compared to PEEK. The maximum stress recorded in the neutral position was 24.145 MPa for PEEK, indicating better biomechanical compatibility. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that PEEK may be an attractive alternative to titanium for spinal fixation, promoting more healthy load transfer and minimizing the risk of stress shielding complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10020072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanical properties of materials for spinal fixation can significantly affect spinal surgical outcomes. Traditional materials such as titanium exhibit high stiffness, which can lead to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. This study investigates the biomechanical performance of titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) in spinal fixation using finite element analysis, through the evaluation of the Shielding Strength Factor (SSF). Methods: A three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) model of an L4/L5 functional spinal unit was developed to simulate the mechanical behavior of three fixation systems: titanium screws and rods (model A), titanium screws with PEEK rods (model B), and PEEK screws and rods (model C). The analysis evaluated stress distribution and load transfer under physiological conditions, in comparison with the intact spine (baseline model). Results: The analysis showed that titanium fixation systems resulted in higher stress shielding effects, with a significant difference in stress distribution compared to PEEK. The maximum stress recorded in the neutral position was 24.145 MPa for PEEK, indicating better biomechanical compatibility. Conclusions: The results suggest that PEEK may be an attractive alternative to titanium for spinal fixation, promoting more healthy load transfer and minimizing the risk of stress shielding complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
From Stents to Smart Implants Employing Biomimetic Materials: The Impact of 4D Printing on Modern Healthcare. Effect of Different Luting Methods on the Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks. Expanding the Applicability of Electroactive Polymers for Tissue Engineering Through Surface Biofunctionalization. Plants Inspired Biomimetics Architecture in Modern Buildings: A Review of Form, Function and Energy. Hybrid BCI for Meal-Assist Robot Using Dry-Type EEG and Pupillary Light Reflex.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1