Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a pooled of cohort studies and Mendelian randomization analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13750-8
Li Wang, Si-Yu Chen, Shun Wan, Kun-Peng Li, Xiao-Ran Li, Li Yang
{"title":"Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a pooled of cohort studies and Mendelian randomization analysis.","authors":"Li Wang, Si-Yu Chen, Shun Wan, Kun-Peng Li, Xiao-Ran Li, Li Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13750-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear, with observational studies reporting inconsistent results. To clarify this ambiguity, we embarked on a comprehensive investigation comprising both a meta-analysis and a Mendelian randomization (MR) study. This dual approach aimed to thoroughly examine not only the association but also the causality between undergoing a vasectomy and the subsequent risk of PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our systematic review meticulously examined cohort studies published until January 2024, employing a random effects model for the computation of relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). For MR Analysis, we leveraged aggregated data from the IEU Open GWAS database, investigating the correlation between genetic predisposition to vasectomy and PCa. We chose single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of European descent as instrumental variables (IVs) for this analysis. The primary method for calculating the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs was inverse variance weighting (IVW). Through sensitivity analysis, we confirmed the robustness of our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our investigation synthesized data from 19 cohort studies, encompassing over four million participants. The combined analysis revealed a statistically significant link between vasectomy and an elevated risk of PCa across any grade (RR = 1.09; 95%CI: 1.05-1.14; P = 0.001; I² = 83.3%). This association was observed for both localized PCa (RR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04-1.13; P < 0.001; I² = 48.8%) and advanced PCa (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.13; P = 0.016; I² = 0%). Nonetheless, the discovery cohort MR Analysis indicated no genetic causal link between vasectomy and PCa (OR = 0.067; 95%CI = 0.002-1.535; P = 0.09). A validation set in the Finnish population confirmed the robustness of the results. This conclusion remained consistent even after controlling for variables such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and body mass index (BMI), suggesting that while a statistical association exists, the genetic evidence does not support a causal relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative analysis indicates a possible elevated risk of PCa in patients who have had a vasectomy. However, MR Analysis has not confirmed a direct causal link between vasectomy and PCa. This suggests that the association observed may not stem from direct causation, allowing for the continued consideration of vasectomy as a viable long-term contraceptive choice. Further research is imperative to uncover any factors that could potentially link vasectomy to an increased risk of prostate cancer, aiming to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13750-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear, with observational studies reporting inconsistent results. To clarify this ambiguity, we embarked on a comprehensive investigation comprising both a meta-analysis and a Mendelian randomization (MR) study. This dual approach aimed to thoroughly examine not only the association but also the causality between undergoing a vasectomy and the subsequent risk of PCa.

Methods: Our systematic review meticulously examined cohort studies published until January 2024, employing a random effects model for the computation of relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). For MR Analysis, we leveraged aggregated data from the IEU Open GWAS database, investigating the correlation between genetic predisposition to vasectomy and PCa. We chose single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of European descent as instrumental variables (IVs) for this analysis. The primary method for calculating the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs was inverse variance weighting (IVW). Through sensitivity analysis, we confirmed the robustness of our findings.

Results: Our investigation synthesized data from 19 cohort studies, encompassing over four million participants. The combined analysis revealed a statistically significant link between vasectomy and an elevated risk of PCa across any grade (RR = 1.09; 95%CI: 1.05-1.14; P = 0.001; I² = 83.3%). This association was observed for both localized PCa (RR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04-1.13; P < 0.001; I² = 48.8%) and advanced PCa (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.13; P = 0.016; I² = 0%). Nonetheless, the discovery cohort MR Analysis indicated no genetic causal link between vasectomy and PCa (OR = 0.067; 95%CI = 0.002-1.535; P = 0.09). A validation set in the Finnish population confirmed the robustness of the results. This conclusion remained consistent even after controlling for variables such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and body mass index (BMI), suggesting that while a statistical association exists, the genetic evidence does not support a causal relationship.

Conclusion: The cumulative analysis indicates a possible elevated risk of PCa in patients who have had a vasectomy. However, MR Analysis has not confirmed a direct causal link between vasectomy and PCa. This suggests that the association observed may not stem from direct causation, allowing for the continued consideration of vasectomy as a viable long-term contraceptive choice. Further research is imperative to uncover any factors that could potentially link vasectomy to an increased risk of prostate cancer, aiming to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Global, regional, and national burden of breast, cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer and their risk factors among women from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2050: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021. Dynamic changes in immune repertoire profiles in patients with stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer during consolidation treatment with immunotherapy. The impact of combining cetuximab with the traditional chemotherapy regimens on clinical effectiveness in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a pooled of cohort studies and Mendelian randomization analysis. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy versus D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastric excision in distal gastric cancer patients with high body mass index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1