Effect of opioid sparing strategies on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y
Lei Wang, Xinhua Hong, Yiting Xue, Zhen Su
{"title":"Effect of opioid sparing strategies on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Lei Wang, Xinhua Hong, Yiting Xue, Zhen Su","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA) or opioid-free anesthesia(OFA) strategy can reduce postoperative pain, but the effect of different stratigies on postoperative pain for patients with high pain sensitivity remains unclear, and the effect of different stratigies on perioperative haemodynamic fluctuations remains controversial for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 173 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into three groups: opioid-free anesthesia group(Group OFA), opioid-sparing anesthesia group(Group OSA) or opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OBA). The preoperative assessment of patients' pain sensitivity was conducted using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded at baseline(T0), after admission (T1), after induction(T2), 1 min after tracheal intubation (T3), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and calculated as the variability of blood pressure (BPV), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV). Time to awake, acute pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to first exhaust were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group OBA, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group OFA and OSA at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>SBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in both Group OSA and OBA compared to the Group OFA (P < 0.05). Group OSA exhibited lower BPV<sub>SBP,</sub> CV<sub>DBP</sub>, and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high pain sensitivity, BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in Group OSA compared to Group OFA (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub> and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> were lower in the OSA group compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). The time to first exhaust was significantly reduced in patients in Group OFA compared with Group OSA and OBA (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OSA can effectively control patients' postoperative pain with lower perioperative haemodynamic variability. It also has lower perioperative haemodynamic variability and acute pain in patients with high pain sensitivity, making it suitable for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093036. Retrospectively registered (date of registration: 27/11/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA) or opioid-free anesthesia(OFA) strategy can reduce postoperative pain, but the effect of different stratigies on postoperative pain for patients with high pain sensitivity remains unclear, and the effect of different stratigies on perioperative haemodynamic fluctuations remains controversial for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: A total of 173 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into three groups: opioid-free anesthesia group(Group OFA), opioid-sparing anesthesia group(Group OSA) or opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OBA). The preoperative assessment of patients' pain sensitivity was conducted using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded at baseline(T0), after admission (T1), after induction(T2), 1 min after tracheal intubation (T3), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and calculated as the variability of blood pressure (BPV), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV). Time to awake, acute pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to first exhaust were also recorded.

Results: Compared with Group OBA, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group OFA and OSA at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). BPVSBP, BPVDBP, BPVMAP, CVSBP, CVDBP, CVMAP, ARVDBP and ARVMAP were lower in both Group OSA and OBA compared to the Group OFA (P < 0.05). Group OSA exhibited lower BPVSBP, CVDBP, and ARVDBP compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high pain sensitivity, BPVSBP, BPVDBP, BPVMAP, CVDBP, CVMAP, ARVSBP, ARVDBP and ARVMAP were lower in Group OSA compared to Group OFA (P < 0.05). BPVDBP, CVDBP, ARVSBP and ARVDBP were lower in the OSA group compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). The time to first exhaust was significantly reduced in patients in Group OFA compared with Group OSA and OBA (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: OSA can effectively control patients' postoperative pain with lower perioperative haemodynamic variability. It also has lower perioperative haemodynamic variability and acute pain in patients with high pain sensitivity, making it suitable for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Trial registration: The trial is registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093036. Retrospectively registered (date of registration: 27/11/2024).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Effect of opioid sparing strategies on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Impact of fospropofol disodium on lipid metabolism and inflammatory response in patients with hyperlipidemia: a randomized trial. Association of impostor phenomenon and burnout among Swiss residents and junior anaesthesiologists: results of a cross-sectional survey. Comparison of postoperative pain severity between primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study. Predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for epidural labor analgesia-associated intrapartum fever: a retrospective single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1