Clinical application of the intersphincteric approach with internal incision combined with counter- drainage for deep perianal abscess.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-03703-7
Jian-Sheng Hu, Lin-Mei Sun, Yang Wu, Xue-Liang Yang, Wen Wang
{"title":"Clinical application of the intersphincteric approach with internal incision combined with counter- drainage for deep perianal abscess.","authors":"Jian-Sheng Hu, Lin-Mei Sun, Yang Wu, Xue-Liang Yang, Wen Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03703-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study evaluates the clinical efficacy of the Intersphincteric Approach with Internal Incision combined with Counter-Drainage (IAICD) for Deep Perianal Abscess (DPA), thereby providing a foundation for selecting optimal surgical treatment methods in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective cohort study design, we analyzed the clinical data of 120 patients who underwent inpatient surgical treatment for DPA at our hospital from January 2022 to June 2023. Of these, 57 patients underwent the IAICD (treatment group), while 63 patients received incision-drainage (control group). Clinical data from both groups were collected for statistical analysis. The primary outcomes measured were clinical efficacy, anal function scores and appearance scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, operation time, wound healing time and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment group had 52 cured cases, with a cure rate of 52/57 (91.2%), whereas the control group had 48 cured cases, with a cure rate of 48/63 (76.2%). The treatment group's clinical efficacy was significantly better than the control group (P = 0.03). The operation time was longer in the treatment group compared to the control group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of anal function scores, appearance scores, postoperative pain, wound healing time and length of hospital stay (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that IAICD was a protective factor for the clinical efficacy of DPA patients (P = 0.01), While wound healing time and a history of perianal surgery were identified as independent risk factors associated with poor prognosis in patients with DPA (P = 0.039, P = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with DPA who have high expectations for minimizing postoperative recurrence, a comprehensive preoperative evaluation-including a history of prior perianal surgery-precise intraoperative localization of the internal opening, and meticulous postoperative wound care can collectively optimize clinical outcomes. The IAICD procedure not only preserves anal sphincter function but also effectively reduces the recurrence rate of postoperative abscesses or fistula formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03703-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study evaluates the clinical efficacy of the Intersphincteric Approach with Internal Incision combined with Counter-Drainage (IAICD) for Deep Perianal Abscess (DPA), thereby providing a foundation for selecting optimal surgical treatment methods in clinical practice.

Methods: Using a retrospective cohort study design, we analyzed the clinical data of 120 patients who underwent inpatient surgical treatment for DPA at our hospital from January 2022 to June 2023. Of these, 57 patients underwent the IAICD (treatment group), while 63 patients received incision-drainage (control group). Clinical data from both groups were collected for statistical analysis. The primary outcomes measured were clinical efficacy, anal function scores and appearance scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, operation time, wound healing time and length of hospital stay.

Results: The treatment group had 52 cured cases, with a cure rate of 52/57 (91.2%), whereas the control group had 48 cured cases, with a cure rate of 48/63 (76.2%). The treatment group's clinical efficacy was significantly better than the control group (P = 0.03). The operation time was longer in the treatment group compared to the control group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of anal function scores, appearance scores, postoperative pain, wound healing time and length of hospital stay (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that IAICD was a protective factor for the clinical efficacy of DPA patients (P = 0.01), While wound healing time and a history of perianal surgery were identified as independent risk factors associated with poor prognosis in patients with DPA (P = 0.039, P = 0.032).

Conclusion: For patients with DPA who have high expectations for minimizing postoperative recurrence, a comprehensive preoperative evaluation-including a history of prior perianal surgery-precise intraoperative localization of the internal opening, and meticulous postoperative wound care can collectively optimize clinical outcomes. The IAICD procedure not only preserves anal sphincter function but also effectively reduces the recurrence rate of postoperative abscesses or fistula formation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
括约肌间入路内切开联合反引流治疗深肛周脓肿的临床应用。
目的:回顾性研究括约肌间入路内切开联合反引流术(IAICD)治疗深肛周脓肿(DPA)的临床疗效,为临床选择最佳手术治疗方式提供依据。方法:采用回顾性队列研究设计,分析我院2022年1月至2023年6月住院手术治疗DPA的120例患者的临床资料。其中57例患者行iicd(治疗组),63例患者行切口引流(对照组)。收集两组临床资料进行统计学分析。测量的主要结果是临床疗效、肛门功能评分和外观评分。次要结局包括术后疼痛、手术时间、伤口愈合时间和住院时间。结果:治疗组治愈52例,治愈率为52/57(91.2%);对照组治愈48例,治愈率为48/63(76.2%)。治疗组临床疗效显著优于对照组(P = 0.03)。治疗组手术时间明显长于对照组(P < 0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,iicd是影响DPA患者临床疗效的保护因素(P = 0.01),而伤口愈合时间和肛周手术史是影响DPA患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P = 0.039, P = 0.032)。结论:对于对术后复发率有较高期望的DPA患者,全面的术前评估(包括既往肛周手术史)、术中精确的内开口定位、术后细致的伤口护理可以共同优化临床结果。IAICD手术不仅保留了肛门括约肌功能,而且有效降低了术后脓肿或瘘管形成的复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Life-threatening lower gastrointestinal bleeding after routine anorectal procedures: a case series and management implications. Association of active endoscopy nurse participation with adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study. Eradication efficacy of empiric bismuth quadruple therapy containing amoxicillin in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori in Ningxia, China. Efficacy of swab-based RUT in detecting H. pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Factors associated with urgent consultation recommendations for patients with inflammatory bowel disease calling a telephone service about worsening symptoms: a secondary analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1