The efficiency of endocardial suture occlusion of the left atrial appendage at a single institution: MICs vs. sternotomy.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12872-025-04540-y
Chengfeng Huang, Jiawen Huang, Si Shen, Yongheng Li, Yanlin Zhang, Xiaoshen Zhang, Hua Lu
{"title":"The efficiency of endocardial suture occlusion of the left atrial appendage at a single institution: MICs vs. sternotomy.","authors":"Chengfeng Huang, Jiawen Huang, Si Shen, Yongheng Li, Yanlin Zhang, Xiaoshen Zhang, Hua Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04540-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most thrombi originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA), preventing thromboembolic stroke is an important aspect of stroke prevention. Previous studies have found that LAA closure is beneficial for preventing thrombosis. Currently, surgical procedures can achieve LAA closure by closing the endocardium or epicardium. LAA endocardial suture technique is performed concomitantly during sternotomy cardiac surgery but can also be performed during right minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with MICS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total number of 74 patients who underwent LAAC during valve operation between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. LAA was closed by continuous suture through the endocardium of the left atrium during cardiac surgery. 42 patients performed LAA endocardial suture during MICS, while 32 patients performed with the same LAAC technique during sternotomy. Patients underwent cardiac computed tomography (CT) follow-up after surgery to verify the completeness of the LAAC. The heart structure and function were recorded by echocardiography Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and the heart rhythm was recorded by electrocardiogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LAA closure procedure was successful in 26 cases (81%) in the sternotomy group and 20 cases (48%) in the right minimally invasive group. Residual shunting (failed LAA closure) was more common in the right minimally invasive group (p = 0.003), and no correlation was found between residual shunting and left atrial (LA), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The incidence of leaks was not associated with mitral valve replacement or valvuloplasty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to sternotomy, residual shunting after MICS was more common. CT imaging analysis of 22 patients with failed closure in the MICS group showed that residual shunting was mainly concentrated on margins of the suture (anterior superior and posterior inferior) (86%), with a middle area accounting for 3 (14%). Based on this finding, reinforcing the suture margins may significantly reduce the incidence of incomplete closure.</p><p><strong>The clinical trial number: </strong>KY-2023-001.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04540-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most thrombi originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA), preventing thromboembolic stroke is an important aspect of stroke prevention. Previous studies have found that LAA closure is beneficial for preventing thrombosis. Currently, surgical procedures can achieve LAA closure by closing the endocardium or epicardium. LAA endocardial suture technique is performed concomitantly during sternotomy cardiac surgery but can also be performed during right minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS).

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with MICS.

Methods: A total number of 74 patients who underwent LAAC during valve operation between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. LAA was closed by continuous suture through the endocardium of the left atrium during cardiac surgery. 42 patients performed LAA endocardial suture during MICS, while 32 patients performed with the same LAAC technique during sternotomy. Patients underwent cardiac computed tomography (CT) follow-up after surgery to verify the completeness of the LAAC. The heart structure and function were recorded by echocardiography Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and the heart rhythm was recorded by electrocardiogram.

Results: The LAA closure procedure was successful in 26 cases (81%) in the sternotomy group and 20 cases (48%) in the right minimally invasive group. Residual shunting (failed LAA closure) was more common in the right minimally invasive group (p = 0.003), and no correlation was found between residual shunting and left atrial (LA), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The incidence of leaks was not associated with mitral valve replacement or valvuloplasty.

Conclusions: Compared to sternotomy, residual shunting after MICS was more common. CT imaging analysis of 22 patients with failed closure in the MICS group showed that residual shunting was mainly concentrated on margins of the suture (anterior superior and posterior inferior) (86%), with a middle area accounting for 3 (14%). Based on this finding, reinforcing the suture margins may significantly reduce the incidence of incomplete closure.

The clinical trial number: KY-2023-001.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单机构左心耳心内膜缝合封堵的有效性:MICs vs.胸骨切开术。
背景:大多数血栓起源于左心耳(LAA),预防血栓栓塞性卒中是卒中预防的一个重要方面。既往研究发现,关闭LAA有利于预防血栓形成。目前,外科手术可以通过关闭心内膜或心外膜来关闭LAA。LAA心内膜缝合技术在胸骨切开心脏手术中同时进行,但也可以在右微创心脏手术(MICS)中进行。目的:评价MICS联合左心耳闭合术(LAAC)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2021年瓣膜手术中LAAC患者74例。在心脏手术中,通过左心房心内膜连续缝合关闭LAA。42例患者在MICS期间采用LAA心内膜缝合,32例患者在胸骨切开时采用相同的LAAC技术。术后患者行心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)随访以验证LAAC的完整性。经胸超声心动图(TTE)记录心脏结构和功能,心电图记录心律。结果:胸骨切开组26例(81%)和右微创组20例(48%)成功闭合LAA。残留分流(LAA闭合失败)在右侧微创组更为常见(p = 0.003),残留分流与左房(LA)、左室舒张末期内径(LVDD)、左室射血分数(LVEF)无相关性。泄漏的发生率与二尖瓣置换术或瓣膜成形术无关。结论:与胸骨切开术相比,MICS术后残留分流更为常见。MICS组22例闭合失败患者的CT影像分析显示,残余分流主要集中在缝线边缘(前上、后下)(86%),中间区域占3(14%)。基于这一发现,加强缝合缘可以显著减少不完全闭合的发生率。临床试验编号:key -2023-001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of various exercise interventions on peak VO2 and quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): a network meta-analysis. Impact of concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump support on outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with veno-arterial ECMO: a propensity-matched analysis. Longitudinal cohort study on the dynamic changes of atherogenic index of plasma and the risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity in middle - aged and elderly people. Prevalence of anemia in adult heart failure patients at Saint Paul's hospital millennium medical college and Saint Peter's speialized hospital in Addis Ababa Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Variability of SBP and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1