Development and Validation of a Preoperative Prediction Model for Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0800
Yanning Zhang, Jinyong Hao, Pengfei Wang, Shaoce Xu, Xiong Zhou, Jingzhe Wang, Xiaojun Huang
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Preoperative Prediction Model for Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps.","authors":"Yanning Zhang, Jinyong Hao, Pengfei Wang, Shaoce Xu, Xiong Zhou, Jingzhe Wang, Xiaojun Huang","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> The primary goal in evaluating gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs) is to identify neoplastic polyps (NP). Numerous studies have investigated risk factors for NP. This study aimed to develop a practical preoperative prediction model for NP using simple and easily accessible clinical variables. <b>Methods</b> We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients with GPLs who underwent cholecystectomy at Lanzhou University Second Hospital between January 2018 and September 2022. A total of 621 cases were included and randomly assigned into a training set (70%) and an internal validation set (30%). An external validation set was established using data from 117 patients treated at other centers between January and December 2023. Univariate logistic analyses were performed, followed by backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis for variables with <i>p</i>< 0.2 to identify significant variables associated with NP. These predictors were included in the final logistic regression model and visualized as a nomogram model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated. <b>Results</b> Age (odd ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.09, <i>p</i>= 0.0001), polyp size (OR = 19.01, 95% CI = 6.48-55.79, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), polyp number (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.12-0.56, <i>p</i> = 0.0006), gallbladder wall thickness (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.02-2.41, <i>p</i>= 0.0385), and polyp echo characteristics (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19-0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.0169) were identified as independent influencing factors for NP. The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram model in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets were 0.886 (95% CI, 0.841-0.930), 0.836 (95% CI, 0.753-0.919), and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.743-0.978), respectively. Calibration curves for the three datasets showed Brier scores of 0.079, 0.092, and 0.070, all below 0.25, indicating good calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) analysis suggested that a threshold probability of 0.6 provided the most significant clinical benefit. <b>Conclusion</b> This prediction model, incorporating easily accessible variables, demonstrated excellent performance in the identification of NP and contributed to clinical decision-making in GPL management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 2","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background The primary goal in evaluating gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs) is to identify neoplastic polyps (NP). Numerous studies have investigated risk factors for NP. This study aimed to develop a practical preoperative prediction model for NP using simple and easily accessible clinical variables. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients with GPLs who underwent cholecystectomy at Lanzhou University Second Hospital between January 2018 and September 2022. A total of 621 cases were included and randomly assigned into a training set (70%) and an internal validation set (30%). An external validation set was established using data from 117 patients treated at other centers between January and December 2023. Univariate logistic analyses were performed, followed by backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis for variables with p< 0.2 to identify significant variables associated with NP. These predictors were included in the final logistic regression model and visualized as a nomogram model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated. Results Age (odd ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.09, p= 0.0001), polyp size (OR = 19.01, 95% CI = 6.48-55.79, p < 0.0001), polyp number (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.12-0.56, p = 0.0006), gallbladder wall thickness (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.02-2.41, p= 0.0385), and polyp echo characteristics (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19-0.85, p = 0.0169) were identified as independent influencing factors for NP. The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram model in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets were 0.886 (95% CI, 0.841-0.930), 0.836 (95% CI, 0.753-0.919), and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.743-0.978), respectively. Calibration curves for the three datasets showed Brier scores of 0.079, 0.092, and 0.070, all below 0.25, indicating good calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) analysis suggested that a threshold probability of 0.6 provided the most significant clinical benefit. Conclusion This prediction model, incorporating easily accessible variables, demonstrated excellent performance in the identification of NP and contributed to clinical decision-making in GPL management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
MiR-545-3p/MT1M axis regulates cell proliferation, invasion and migration in hepatocellular carcinoma
IF 7.5 2区 医学Biomedicine & PharmacotherapyPub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.009
Liu Changjun , Huang Feizhou , Peng Dezhen , Lei Zhao , Mao Xianhai
miRNA-27b-3p/TPX2 Axis Regulates Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Cell Proliferation, Invasion and Migration.
IF 1.6 4区 医学Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene ExpressionPub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2023048827
Nana Liu, Yicheng Jiang, Shiyuan Chen, Fang Pan, Yao Tang, Xingping Tan
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Clinical Academic Surgical Training and Career Development in the United Kingdom: A Review from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Surgical Technology Incubator (ASTI) Group. Changing the Narrative: Confronting Diabetes-Related Stigma in Healthcare. Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Conversion Therapy Response and Prognosis in Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver-Limited Metastases: A Retrospective Study. Comparative Evaluation of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Postoperative Breast Cancer Treatment. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Two Silver-Containing Dressings in the Treatment of Deep Partial-Thickness Thermal Burns: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1