Early Prediction of Death Risk in Progressive Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Radiomics Nomogram Based on Clinical Semantic Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0658
Yuzhen Xi, Yuanhui Ding, Yingjiao Zhang, Mengze Wang, Chunying Wu, Xuan Chen, Lei Ruan, Zhongxiang Ding, Feng Jiang, Miao Liu
{"title":"Early Prediction of Death Risk in Progressive Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Radiomics Nomogram Based on Clinical Semantic Multi-Parameter Magnetic Resonance Imaging.","authors":"Yuzhen Xi, Yuanhui Ding, Yingjiao Zhang, Mengze Wang, Chunying Wu, Xuan Chen, Lei Ruan, Zhongxiang Ding, Feng Jiang, Miao Liu","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Patients with recurrent or/and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have a notably low survival rate. Our primary objective in this study is to establish a comprehensive nomogram model based on clinical factors, semantic features, and multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features, and to predict the risk of mortality in patients with progressive NPC following intensity-modulated radiation therapy. <b>Methods</b> A retrospective study, including 110 patients with recurrent or/and metastatic NPC who underwent treatment at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between June 2012 and December 2016, was conducted. Comprehensive reviews of clinical and pre-treatment MRI data were undertaken. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their mortality status within a 5 year-frame: the non-death group (54 cases) and the death group (56 cases). Radiomic features were extracted from patients' MRIs and the best feature set was selected. Each patient was assigned a radiomic score (Rad-Score). A combined model was constructed using multivariate binary logistic regression, incorporating Rad-Score, semantic features, and clinical data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were generated to evaluate the predictive performance of the radiomic feature model, the clinical-semantic feature model, and the combined model for predicting death risk in patients with progressive NPC. A nomogram based on the combined model was constructed. <b>Results</b> Gender, invasion of the carotid sheath by the primary tumour, tumour volume, and progression time showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the three models in the death and non-death groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) value for the radiomic feature model was 0.861 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.783-0.920), while the AUC value for the clinical-semantic feature model was 0.797 (95% CI: 0.709-0.868). The combined model demonstrated the highest efficacy for predicting death risk in NPC patients, with an AUC value of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.832-0.952), accuracy of 0.818, sensitivity of 0.857, specificity of 0.870, negative predictive value of 0.778, and positive predictive value of 0.857. <b>Conclusion</b> The combined model incorporating clinical features, semantic features and multi-parameter MRI radiomic features is a highly valuable tool for predicting death risk in patients with progressive NPC, providing a quantitative approach to aiding in early clinical intervention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 2","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Patients with recurrent or/and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have a notably low survival rate. Our primary objective in this study is to establish a comprehensive nomogram model based on clinical factors, semantic features, and multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features, and to predict the risk of mortality in patients with progressive NPC following intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Methods A retrospective study, including 110 patients with recurrent or/and metastatic NPC who underwent treatment at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between June 2012 and December 2016, was conducted. Comprehensive reviews of clinical and pre-treatment MRI data were undertaken. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their mortality status within a 5 year-frame: the non-death group (54 cases) and the death group (56 cases). Radiomic features were extracted from patients' MRIs and the best feature set was selected. Each patient was assigned a radiomic score (Rad-Score). A combined model was constructed using multivariate binary logistic regression, incorporating Rad-Score, semantic features, and clinical data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were generated to evaluate the predictive performance of the radiomic feature model, the clinical-semantic feature model, and the combined model for predicting death risk in patients with progressive NPC. A nomogram based on the combined model was constructed. Results Gender, invasion of the carotid sheath by the primary tumour, tumour volume, and progression time showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the three models in the death and non-death groups (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) value for the radiomic feature model was 0.861 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.783-0.920), while the AUC value for the clinical-semantic feature model was 0.797 (95% CI: 0.709-0.868). The combined model demonstrated the highest efficacy for predicting death risk in NPC patients, with an AUC value of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.832-0.952), accuracy of 0.818, sensitivity of 0.857, specificity of 0.870, negative predictive value of 0.778, and positive predictive value of 0.857. Conclusion The combined model incorporating clinical features, semantic features and multi-parameter MRI radiomic features is a highly valuable tool for predicting death risk in patients with progressive NPC, providing a quantitative approach to aiding in early clinical intervention and treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Paradigm of Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. The Impact of COVID-19 on UK Medical Students' Perceptions of Cardiothoracic Surgery-A Comparison of Nationwide Surveys in 2018 and 2022. Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Ultrasound Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. What is the Future of Diagnostics in Heart Failure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1