Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel/Olaparib in Comparison to Paclitaxel/Carboplatin in Patients with HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and HRD-Long-term Survival of the GeparOLA Study.

IF 10.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2806
Peter A Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Johannes Holtschmidt, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christoph Uleer, Wolfgang D Schmitt, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Carsten Denkert, Rita K Schmutzler, Christine Solbach, Eric Hahnen, Andreas Hartkopf, Michael Untch, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel/Olaparib in Comparison to Paclitaxel/Carboplatin in Patients with HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and HRD-Long-term Survival of the GeparOLA Study.","authors":"Peter A Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Johannes Holtschmidt, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christoph Uleer, Wolfgang D Schmitt, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Carsten Denkert, Rita K Schmutzler, Christine Solbach, Eric Hahnen, Andreas Hartkopf, Michael Untch, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The GeparOLA study evaluated paclitaxel plus olaparib (PO) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD was defined by high HRD score or germline (g)/tumor (t) BRCA1/2 mutations (g/tBRCA1/2mut). In this study, we report long-term outcome data.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a randomized, multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer with HRD with an indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and triple-negative breast cancer, or cT1c and Ki-67 >20%) were randomly assigned to PO or paclitaxel + carboplatin (PCb), both followed by epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. Long-term efficacy endpoints were secondary endpoints and included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival, with a planned median follow-up of >4 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2016 and July 2018, 107 patients were randomized and 106 (PO N = 69 and PCb N = 37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years; of all patients, 35.8% had cT1 tumors, 31.4% were cN+, 86.8% had G3 tumors, 89.6% had Ki-67 >20%, and 72.6% were triple negative. After a median follow-up of 49.8 months, 18 (15 in PO and three in PCb) iDFS events and seven (six in PO and one in PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year iDFS (76.0% PO vs. 88.5% PCb, hazard ratio = 2.86; 95% CI, 0.83-9.90; log-rank P = 0.081), DDFS (81.2% PO vs. 93.4% PCb, hazard ratio = 3.03; 95% CI, 0.67-13.67; log-rank P = 0.129), and overall survival (89.2% PO vs. 96.9% PCb, hazard ratio = 3.27; 95% CI, 0.39-27.20; log-rank P = 0.244) tended to be inferior with olaparib. Patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut benefited from Cb (seven of 30 patients had iDFS/DDFS events in PO vs. 0/16 in PCb; log-rank P = 0.037), whereas no difference for patients with g/tBRCA1/2mut was observed (hazard ratio = 1.16, log-rank P = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For HER2-negative early breast cancer with HRD, olaparib showed a tendency for inferior outcomes compared with Cb, particularly in patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut. In patients with g/tBRCA1/2mut, olaparib may replace Cb.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":"1596-1604"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The GeparOLA study evaluated paclitaxel plus olaparib (PO) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD was defined by high HRD score or germline (g)/tumor (t) BRCA1/2 mutations (g/tBRCA1/2mut). In this study, we report long-term outcome data.

Patients and methods: GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a randomized, multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer with HRD with an indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and triple-negative breast cancer, or cT1c and Ki-67 >20%) were randomly assigned to PO or paclitaxel + carboplatin (PCb), both followed by epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. Long-term efficacy endpoints were secondary endpoints and included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival, with a planned median follow-up of >4 years.

Results: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 107 patients were randomized and 106 (PO N = 69 and PCb N = 37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years; of all patients, 35.8% had cT1 tumors, 31.4% were cN+, 86.8% had G3 tumors, 89.6% had Ki-67 >20%, and 72.6% were triple negative. After a median follow-up of 49.8 months, 18 (15 in PO and three in PCb) iDFS events and seven (six in PO and one in PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year iDFS (76.0% PO vs. 88.5% PCb, hazard ratio = 2.86; 95% CI, 0.83-9.90; log-rank P = 0.081), DDFS (81.2% PO vs. 93.4% PCb, hazard ratio = 3.03; 95% CI, 0.67-13.67; log-rank P = 0.129), and overall survival (89.2% PO vs. 96.9% PCb, hazard ratio = 3.27; 95% CI, 0.39-27.20; log-rank P = 0.244) tended to be inferior with olaparib. Patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut benefited from Cb (seven of 30 patients had iDFS/DDFS events in PO vs. 0/16 in PCb; log-rank P = 0.037), whereas no difference for patients with g/tBRCA1/2mut was observed (hazard ratio = 1.16, log-rank P = 0.83).

Conclusions: For HER2-negative early breast cancer with HRD, olaparib showed a tendency for inferior outcomes compared with Cb, particularly in patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut. In patients with g/tBRCA1/2mut, olaparib may replace Cb.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HER2阴性BC和HRD患者新辅助紫杉醇/奥拉帕利与紫杉醇/卡铂的比较--GeparOLA研究的长期生存率。
背景:GeparOLA研究评估了紫杉醇(P)联合奥拉帕尼(O)在her2阴性早期乳腺癌(eBC)同源重组缺乏症(HRD)患者新辅助化疗(NACT)中的应用。HRD的定义是HRD评分高或种系(g)/肿瘤(t) BRCA1/2突变(g/tBRCA1/2mut)。在这里,我们报告了长期结果数据。患者和方法:GeparOLA (NCT02789332)是一项随机、多中心、前瞻性、开放标签的II期试验。her2阴性eBC, HRD,化疗指指(ct2 - ct4 - a-d或cT1c和cN+或cT1c和pNSLN+或cT1c和三阴性[TN]BC或cT1c和Ki-67 bb0 20%)的患者随机分配到P+O或P+卡铂(Cb),随后都是表柔比星+环磷酰胺(EC)。长期疗效终点为次要终点,包括侵袭性无病生存期(iDFS)、远端无病生存期(DDFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:2016年9月至2018年7月,共纳入107例患者,其中106例(PO N=69;PCb N=37)开始治疗。中位年龄47.0岁;cT1肿瘤占35.8%;cN+占31.4%;G3肿瘤占86.8%;89.6% Ki-67 bb0, 20%为TN, 72.6%为TN。中位随访49.8个月,18(15 PO;3个PCb) iDFS事件和7个(6个PO;报告了1例多氯联苯死亡。4年iDFS (76.0%PO vs 88.5%PCb, HR=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.90],log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (81.2%PO vs 93.4%PCb, HR=3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67],log-rank p=0.129)和OS (89.2%PO vs 96.9%PCb, HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.20],log-rank p=0.244)倾向于o较差。没有g/tBRCA1/2mut的患者受益于Cb[7/30患者在PO中有iDFS/DDFS事件,而在PCb中有0/16]。结论:对于her2阴性eBC合并HRD,与卡铂相比,奥拉帕尼表现出较差的结局趋势,特别是在没有g/tBRCA1/2mut的患者中。在g/tBRCA1/2mut患者中,奥拉帕尼可以替代卡铂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
期刊最新文献
FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer. Genomic Profiling of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Post-Progression on First-Line Osimertinib: Phase II ORCHARD Study. Pre-existing TCR clones drive major pathological responses in HNSCC patients treated with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors. Locus-specific human endogenous retrovirus ERVK18 expression indicates an inflamed microenvironment and favorable immunotherapy outcome in small cell lung cancer. Why preclinical models for cancer drug development fail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1