Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with HER2-negative BC and HRD -long-term survival of the GeparOLA study.
Peter A Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Johannes Holtschmidt, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christoph Uleer, Wolfgang D Schmitt, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Carsten Denkert, Rita K Schmutzler, Christine Solbach, Eric Hahnen, Andreas Hartkopf, Michael Untch, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl
{"title":"Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with HER2-negative BC and HRD -long-term survival of the GeparOLA study.","authors":"Peter A Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Johannes Holtschmidt, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christoph Uleer, Wolfgang D Schmitt, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Carsten Denkert, Rita K Schmutzler, Christine Solbach, Eric Hahnen, Andreas Hartkopf, Michael Untch, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgound: </strong>The GeparOLA study evaluated paclitaxel(P) plus olaparib(O) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer (eBC) with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD was defined by high HRD-score or germline(g)/tumor(t) BRCA1/2 mutations (g/tBRCA1/2mut). Here, we report long-term outcome data.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a randomized, multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with HER2-negative eBC, HRD, indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and triple-negative[TN]BC or cT1c and Ki-67>20%), were randomly assigned to P+O or P+carboplatin(Cb), both followed by epirubicin+cyclophosphamide(EC). Long-term efficacy endpoints were secondary endpoints and included invasive disease-free survival(iDFS), distant disease-free survival(DDFS) and overall survival(OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 09/2016 and 07/2018, 107 patients were randomized and 106 (PO N=69;PCb N=37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years; 35.8% had cT1 tumors; 31.4% were cN+; 86.8% had G3 tumors; 89.6% had Ki-67>20% and 72.6% were TN. After median follow-up of 49.8 months, 18(15 PO; 3 PCb) iDFS events and 7(6 PO; 1 PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year iDFS (76.0%PO vs 88.5%PCb, HR=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.90],log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (81.2%PO vs 93.4%PCb, HR=3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67],log-rank p=0.129) and OS (89.2%PO vs 96.9%PCb, HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.20],log-rank p=0.244) tended to be inferior with O. Patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut benefited from Cb [7/30 patients had iDFS/DDFS events in PO vs 0/16 in PCb].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For HER2-negative eBC with HRD, olaparib showed a tendency for inferior outcomes compared to carboplatin, particularly in patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut. In patients with g/tBRCA1/2mut olaparib may replace carboplatin.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgound: The GeparOLA study evaluated paclitaxel(P) plus olaparib(O) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer (eBC) with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD was defined by high HRD-score or germline(g)/tumor(t) BRCA1/2 mutations (g/tBRCA1/2mut). Here, we report long-term outcome data.
Patients and methods: GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a randomized, multicenter, prospective, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with HER2-negative eBC, HRD, indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and triple-negative[TN]BC or cT1c and Ki-67>20%), were randomly assigned to P+O or P+carboplatin(Cb), both followed by epirubicin+cyclophosphamide(EC). Long-term efficacy endpoints were secondary endpoints and included invasive disease-free survival(iDFS), distant disease-free survival(DDFS) and overall survival(OS).
Results: Between 09/2016 and 07/2018, 107 patients were randomized and 106 (PO N=69;PCb N=37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years; 35.8% had cT1 tumors; 31.4% were cN+; 86.8% had G3 tumors; 89.6% had Ki-67>20% and 72.6% were TN. After median follow-up of 49.8 months, 18(15 PO; 3 PCb) iDFS events and 7(6 PO; 1 PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year iDFS (76.0%PO vs 88.5%PCb, HR=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.90],log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (81.2%PO vs 93.4%PCb, HR=3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67],log-rank p=0.129) and OS (89.2%PO vs 96.9%PCb, HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.20],log-rank p=0.244) tended to be inferior with O. Patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut benefited from Cb [7/30 patients had iDFS/DDFS events in PO vs 0/16 in PCb].
Conclusion: For HER2-negative eBC with HRD, olaparib showed a tendency for inferior outcomes compared to carboplatin, particularly in patients without g/tBRCA1/2mut. In patients with g/tBRCA1/2mut olaparib may replace carboplatin.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.