What is the optimal timing for advising patients to wash the treatment areas after laser therapy? A prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"What is the optimal timing for advising patients to wash the treatment areas after laser therapy? A prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yue Han, Rui Chang, Lanjun Liu, Jiafang Zhu, Wenxin Yu, Linting Huang, Wei Fang, Wei Gao, Gang Ma, Ying Shang, Xiaoxi Lin","doi":"10.1093/ced/llae525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite ongoing advancements in medical aesthetics, there remains a lack of consensus regarding a standardized postoperative care protocol following laser treatment for skin pigmentation disorders.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the influence of postoperative facial cleansing practices on the efficacy and safety of laser therapy among patients diagnosed with pigmentary skin diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients diagnosed with pigmented lesions (freckles and/or solar lentigines) were randomly allocated to two distinct groups. Following treatment with a 755-nm alexandrite laser, patients in one group were instructed to perform water cleansing, while the other followed a water-avoidance care protocol. Follow-up visits were conducted on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 after treatment and 3 months postoperatively. These visits included taking standardized photographs, performing VISIA imaging assessments, collecting patient satisfaction questionnaires and recording any potential adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No serious complications were reported in either group. Most patients demonstrated improvement in their lesions to varying degrees with a single treatment session. No statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups in terms of postoperative visual analogue scale scores (P = 0.17). VISIA analysis revealed a significant decrease in brown spot count in both groups at the 3-month follow-up compared with baseline, with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.99). The average score of patients' satisfaction in the water-cleansing group was significantly higher than that in the water-avoidance group (P = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our studies have demonstrated that laser treatment of epidermal hyperpigmentation disorders without strict water avoidance can have equally good results with no added adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite ongoing advancements in medical aesthetics, there remains a lack of consensus regarding a standardized postoperative care protocol following laser treatment for skin pigmentation disorders.
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of postoperative facial cleansing practices on the efficacy and safety of laser therapy among patients diagnosed with pigmentary skin diseases.
Methods: Thirty patients diagnosed with pigmented lesions (freckles and/or solar lentigines) were randomly allocated to two distinct groups. Following treatment with a 755-nm alexandrite laser, patients in one group were instructed to perform water cleansing, while the other followed a water-avoidance care protocol. Follow-up visits were conducted on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 after treatment and 3 months postoperatively. These visits included taking standardized photographs, performing VISIA imaging assessments, collecting patient satisfaction questionnaires and recording any potential adverse events.
Results: No serious complications were reported in either group. Most patients demonstrated improvement in their lesions to varying degrees with a single treatment session. No statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups in terms of postoperative visual analogue scale scores (P = 0.17). VISIA analysis revealed a significant decrease in brown spot count in both groups at the 3-month follow-up compared with baseline, with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.99). The average score of patients' satisfaction in the water-cleansing group was significantly higher than that in the water-avoidance group (P = 0.039).
Conclusions: Our studies have demonstrated that laser treatment of epidermal hyperpigmentation disorders without strict water avoidance can have equally good results with no added adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.