Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Geriatric Oncology Clinic in Toronto, Canada.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.3390/curroncol32020089
Ines B Menjak, Khloe Campos, Mark Pasetka, Arlene Budden, Elaine Curle, Leslie Gibson, Ewa Szumacher, Rajin Mehta
{"title":"Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Geriatric Oncology Clinic in Toronto, Canada.","authors":"Ines B Menjak, Khloe Campos, Mark Pasetka, Arlene Budden, Elaine Curle, Leslie Gibson, Ewa Szumacher, Rajin Mehta","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32020089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults with cancer tend to face more complex health needs than their younger counterparts. Patients > 65 years of age are recommended for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to capture and address age-related vulnerabilities. Access to geriatrics services is limited, and our baseline audit of geriatric referrals in 2019 from the cancer program revealed that only 30% of patients referred received a CGA. The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of a geriatric oncology (GO) clinic that employs CGA and determine patient outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single institution. Data collection included baseline characteristics, GO clinic findings and characteristics, recommendations/referrals, and emergency room (ER) visits/hospitalizations within 6 months of CGA. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. A total of 100 patients were included, with a median (range) age of 80 (63-97) years; 70% were female, and the most common cancer type was breast (31%). Through the GO clinic, patients were seen in a timely manner, with a median of 3 weeks, compared to our historical baseline of 11 weeks. Cognitive decline (32%) and pre-treatment CGA (22%) were the most common reasons for referral, and the most common new diagnosis was cognitive impairment (65%). For pre-treatment CGA, 16 (48%) patients were deemed suitable for treatment and 10 (30%) were recommended for modified treatment; 34 (94%) referring physicians followed the recommendation. In addition, most (68%) patients received an allied health referral. One third of patients visited the ER and 30 (30%) patients were hospitalized. Overall, the GO clinic resulted in greater access to CGA in a timely manner, enhanced access to allied health, and assisted in treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults with cancer tend to face more complex health needs than their younger counterparts. Patients > 65 years of age are recommended for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to capture and address age-related vulnerabilities. Access to geriatrics services is limited, and our baseline audit of geriatric referrals in 2019 from the cancer program revealed that only 30% of patients referred received a CGA. The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of a geriatric oncology (GO) clinic that employs CGA and determine patient outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single institution. Data collection included baseline characteristics, GO clinic findings and characteristics, recommendations/referrals, and emergency room (ER) visits/hospitalizations within 6 months of CGA. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. A total of 100 patients were included, with a median (range) age of 80 (63-97) years; 70% were female, and the most common cancer type was breast (31%). Through the GO clinic, patients were seen in a timely manner, with a median of 3 weeks, compared to our historical baseline of 11 weeks. Cognitive decline (32%) and pre-treatment CGA (22%) were the most common reasons for referral, and the most common new diagnosis was cognitive impairment (65%). For pre-treatment CGA, 16 (48%) patients were deemed suitable for treatment and 10 (30%) were recommended for modified treatment; 34 (94%) referring physicians followed the recommendation. In addition, most (68%) patients received an allied health referral. One third of patients visited the ER and 30 (30%) patients were hospitalized. Overall, the GO clinic resulted in greater access to CGA in a timely manner, enhanced access to allied health, and assisted in treatment decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在加拿大多伦多开设多学科老年肿瘤诊所。
老年癌症患者往往比年轻人面临更复杂的健康需求。建议65岁以下的患者进行综合老年评估(CGA),以捕获和解决与年龄相关的脆弱性。获得老年医学服务的机会是有限的,我们在2019年对癌症项目的老年医学转诊进行的基线审计显示,只有30%的转诊患者接受了CGA。本研究的目的是评估采用CGA的老年肿瘤学(GO)诊所的实施情况,并确定患者的预后。我们在一家机构进行了回顾性队列研究。收集的数据包括基线特征、GO临床表现和特征、推荐/转诊以及CGA发生6个月内的急诊室(ER)就诊/住院情况。采用描述性统计进行分析。共纳入100例患者,中位(范围)年龄为80(63-97)岁;70%是女性,最常见的癌症类型是乳腺癌(31%)。通过GO诊所,患者及时就诊,中位数为3周,而我们的历史基线为11周。认知能力下降(32%)和治疗前CGA(22%)是最常见的转诊原因,最常见的新诊断是认知障碍(65%)。对于治疗前CGA, 16例(48%)患者认为适合治疗,10例(30%)患者推荐改良治疗;34名(94%)转诊医生遵循了建议。此外,大多数(68%)患者接受了联合医疗转诊。三分之一的患者去了急诊室,30名(30%)患者住院。总的来说,GO诊所使更多的人能够及时获得CGA,增加了获得联合医疗的机会,并有助于治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Treatment Received in Patients with Stage I Lung Cancer in Ontario: A Population-Based Analysis. A Novel ATRIP Mutation Detected in an Iranian Family with Familial Clustering of Breast Cancer: A Case Report. Familial Risk Factors in Thyroid Cancer Across Generations and Geographics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Magnetic Resonance of Pulmonary Nodules in Oncological Patients: Are We Ready to Replace Chest CT in Detecting Extrathoracic Cancer? Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction Following Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1