Thomas Gerhard Wolf, Kevin Simon Florian Ottiger, David Donnermeyer, Sven Schumann, Andrea Lisa Waber
{"title":"Morphology of Maxillary Central Incisors in a Mixed Swiss-German Population by Means of Micro-CT.","authors":"Thomas Gerhard Wolf, Kevin Simon Florian Ottiger, David Donnermeyer, Sven Schumann, Andrea Lisa Waber","doi":"10.3390/dj13020072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The objective of this study was to investigate the internal morphology and root canal configurations (RCCs) of maxillary central incisors (MxCIs) in a Swiss-German population by means of micro-computed tomography (µCT). <b>Methods</b>: RCCs, main foramina, and accessory canals of MxCIs were examined using µCT and 3D imaging software. The root canal anatomy was classified according to three classification systems by Vertucci (Ve, 1984), Weine et al. (We, 1969), and Briseño-Marroquín et al. (Br, 2015). <b>Results</b>: The most common RCC observed among a total of 112 investigated single-rooted maxillary central incisors was Br 1-1-1/1 (97.3%, Ve I, We I), with a small percentage showing Br 1-1-1/2 (2.7%). One main foramen existed in 87.5% of the specimens, 8% had one accessory foramen, 3.5% had two, and a rare case had four accessory foramina (0.9%). Accessory root canals were mainly located in the middle and apical regions of the roots. <b>Conclusions</b>: Detailed insights into the root canal morphology of MxCIs in a Swiss-German population are provided. The predominant RCC was a simple root canal (Ve I, Br 1-1-1/1). However, accessory canals were detected in the middle and apical third in over 40% of the teeth examined. These anatomical features should be considered during endodontic treatment planning and execution.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the internal morphology and root canal configurations (RCCs) of maxillary central incisors (MxCIs) in a Swiss-German population by means of micro-computed tomography (µCT). Methods: RCCs, main foramina, and accessory canals of MxCIs were examined using µCT and 3D imaging software. The root canal anatomy was classified according to three classification systems by Vertucci (Ve, 1984), Weine et al. (We, 1969), and Briseño-Marroquín et al. (Br, 2015). Results: The most common RCC observed among a total of 112 investigated single-rooted maxillary central incisors was Br 1-1-1/1 (97.3%, Ve I, We I), with a small percentage showing Br 1-1-1/2 (2.7%). One main foramen existed in 87.5% of the specimens, 8% had one accessory foramen, 3.5% had two, and a rare case had four accessory foramina (0.9%). Accessory root canals were mainly located in the middle and apical regions of the roots. Conclusions: Detailed insights into the root canal morphology of MxCIs in a Swiss-German population are provided. The predominant RCC was a simple root canal (Ve I, Br 1-1-1/1). However, accessory canals were detected in the middle and apical third in over 40% of the teeth examined. These anatomical features should be considered during endodontic treatment planning and execution.
背景/目的:本研究的目的是通过微型计算机断层扫描(µCT)研究瑞士-德国人群上颌中切牙(MxCIs)的内部形态和根管结构(RCCs)。方法:采用微CT和三维成像软件对mxci的rcc、主孔和副管进行检查。Vertucci (Ve, 1984)、Weine et al. (We, 1969)和Briseño-Marroquín et al. (Br, 2015)将根管解剖分为三种分类体系。结果:112例单根上颌中切牙中最常见的RCC是br1 -1-1/1 (97.3%, Ve I, We I), br1 -1-1/2(2.7%)占很小比例。87.5%的标本有1个主孔,8%的标本有1个副孔,3.5%的标本有2个副孔,仅有0.9%的标本有4个副孔。副根管主要位于根的中部和根尖区域。结论:提供了对瑞士-德国人群中mxci根管形态的详细见解。主要的RCC是单根管(Ve I, Br 1-1-1/1)。然而,在超过40%的牙齿检查中,在中间和根尖三分之一处发现了副管。在根管治疗计划和执行时应考虑这些解剖学特征。