Consumer and community involvement: implementation research for impact (CCIRI) - implementing evidence-based patient and public involvement across health and medical research in Australia - a mixed methods protocol.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Research Policy and Systems Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s12961-025-01293-0
Ashley H Ng, Sandra Reeder, Angela Jones, Ainslie Cahill, Debra Langridge, Susanne Baker, Leah Heiss, Alan Dorin, Helena Teede
{"title":"Consumer and community involvement: implementation research for impact (CCIRI) - implementing evidence-based patient and public involvement across health and medical research in Australia - a mixed methods protocol.","authors":"Ashley H Ng, Sandra Reeder, Angela Jones, Ainslie Cahill, Debra Langridge, Susanne Baker, Leah Heiss, Alan Dorin, Helena Teede","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01293-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within Australia, there is increasing recognition of the importance and value of patient and public involvement, or consumer and community involvement (CCI), in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Despite this and policy mandates, there has been little behavioural and systems change to embed and support CCI. Often, this is relegated to tokenistic gestures rather than authentic partnerships. The aim of this national project is to use evidence-generated knowledge co-led by consumers, community members, researchers and clinicians to embed CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Learning Health System framework underpin the project to facilitate an iterative process to change systems and individual behaviour towards adoption of CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Key stakeholder groups include research translation centres, funding bodies, clinicians, professional staff involved in healthcare improvement, researchers and consumers and community members. To understand the attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, behaviours, system barriers and facilitators around CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement, semi-structured interviews and surveys will be conducted across key stakeholder groups. Template analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to report data from the national survey respectively prior to triangulation of data. Findings will be reported through traditional scientific outputs such as conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Other anticipated outputs include policy briefs, organizational implementation toolkits and resources and a co-designed digital knowledge hub to support individuals with implementation and scale up across stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will build on considerable stakeholder engagement and prior priority-setting and includes broad and detailed consideration of perspectives from diverse stakeholders at a national level. Robust methodological frameworks, co-design and partnership with stakeholders will be used to inform resources to support systems change to facilitate CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Ethics approval was obtained from Monash Health (RES-23-0000-275Q).</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01293-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Within Australia, there is increasing recognition of the importance and value of patient and public involvement, or consumer and community involvement (CCI), in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Despite this and policy mandates, there has been little behavioural and systems change to embed and support CCI. Often, this is relegated to tokenistic gestures rather than authentic partnerships. The aim of this national project is to use evidence-generated knowledge co-led by consumers, community members, researchers and clinicians to embed CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement.

Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Learning Health System framework underpin the project to facilitate an iterative process to change systems and individual behaviour towards adoption of CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Key stakeholder groups include research translation centres, funding bodies, clinicians, professional staff involved in healthcare improvement, researchers and consumers and community members. To understand the attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, behaviours, system barriers and facilitators around CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement, semi-structured interviews and surveys will be conducted across key stakeholder groups. Template analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to report data from the national survey respectively prior to triangulation of data. Findings will be reported through traditional scientific outputs such as conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Other anticipated outputs include policy briefs, organizational implementation toolkits and resources and a co-designed digital knowledge hub to support individuals with implementation and scale up across stakeholders.

Discussion: This study will build on considerable stakeholder engagement and prior priority-setting and includes broad and detailed consideration of perspectives from diverse stakeholders at a national level. Robust methodological frameworks, co-design and partnership with stakeholders will be used to inform resources to support systems change to facilitate CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Ethics approval was obtained from Monash Health (RES-23-0000-275Q).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者和社区参与:实施影响研究(CCIRI)——在澳大利亚的卫生和医学研究中实施基于证据的患者和公众参与——一项混合方法协议。
背景:在澳大利亚,人们越来越认识到患者和公众参与,或消费者和社区参与(CCI)在健康和医学研究以及改善医疗保健方面的重要性和价值。尽管有这样的政策要求,但嵌入和支持CCI的行为和系统变化很少。通常,这只是象征性的姿态,而不是真正的伙伴关系。这一国家项目的目的是利用由消费者、社区成员、研究人员和临床医生共同领导的循证知识,将CCI纳入卫生和医学研究以及改善卫生保健。方法:实施研究综合框架和学习型卫生系统框架支持该项目,以促进在卫生和医学研究和卫生保健改善中采用CCI的系统和个人行为的迭代过程。主要利益相关者群体包括研究翻译中心、资助机构、临床医生、参与改善医疗保健的专业人员、研究人员和消费者以及社区成员。为了了解在健康和医学研究以及医疗保健改善方面围绕CCI的态度、知识、信念、行为、系统障碍和促进因素,将在主要利益相关者群体中进行半结构化访谈和调查。在对数据进行三角测量之前,将分别使用模板分析和描述性统计来报告全国调查的数据。研究结果将通过会议报告和同行评议出版物等传统的科学产出进行报告。其他预期产出包括政策简报、组织实施工具包和资源,以及一个共同设计的数字知识中心,以支持个人在利益相关者之间实施和扩大规模。讨论:本研究将建立在大量利益相关者参与和事先确定优先事项的基础上,并包括在国家层面广泛而详细地考虑来自不同利益相关者的观点。将使用强有力的方法框架、共同设计和与利益攸关方的伙伴关系来告知资源,以支持系统变革,促进卫生和医学研究中的CCI以及卫生保健改善。获得Monash Health (RES-23-0000-275Q)的伦理批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
期刊最新文献
Stakeholders' perspectives on community health nursing practice in the healthcare system of Iran: a qualitative study. Determinants of quality laboratory service provision amongst government comprehensive specialized hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. Impact assessment of telehealth medical nutrition therapy for managing cardiovascular disease risk in rural and remote NSW: the Healthy Rural Hearts study. Method for and potential value of reflexive stakeholder mapping of a policy evaluation team: the example of the national evaluation of the NHS Pharmacy First scheme. Barriers and opportunities for participation in health policy decision-making by civil society groups organized for cancer in Chile: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1