Consumer and community involvement: implementation research for impact (CCIRI) - implementing evidence-based patient and public involvement across health and medical research in Australia - a mixed methods protocol.
Ashley H Ng, Sandra Reeder, Angela Jones, Ainslie Cahill, Debra Langridge, Susanne Baker, Leah Heiss, Alan Dorin, Helena Teede
{"title":"Consumer and community involvement: implementation research for impact (CCIRI) - implementing evidence-based patient and public involvement across health and medical research in Australia - a mixed methods protocol.","authors":"Ashley H Ng, Sandra Reeder, Angela Jones, Ainslie Cahill, Debra Langridge, Susanne Baker, Leah Heiss, Alan Dorin, Helena Teede","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01293-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within Australia, there is increasing recognition of the importance and value of patient and public involvement, or consumer and community involvement (CCI), in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Despite this and policy mandates, there has been little behavioural and systems change to embed and support CCI. Often, this is relegated to tokenistic gestures rather than authentic partnerships. The aim of this national project is to use evidence-generated knowledge co-led by consumers, community members, researchers and clinicians to embed CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Learning Health System framework underpin the project to facilitate an iterative process to change systems and individual behaviour towards adoption of CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Key stakeholder groups include research translation centres, funding bodies, clinicians, professional staff involved in healthcare improvement, researchers and consumers and community members. To understand the attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, behaviours, system barriers and facilitators around CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement, semi-structured interviews and surveys will be conducted across key stakeholder groups. Template analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to report data from the national survey respectively prior to triangulation of data. Findings will be reported through traditional scientific outputs such as conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Other anticipated outputs include policy briefs, organizational implementation toolkits and resources and a co-designed digital knowledge hub to support individuals with implementation and scale up across stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will build on considerable stakeholder engagement and prior priority-setting and includes broad and detailed consideration of perspectives from diverse stakeholders at a national level. Robust methodological frameworks, co-design and partnership with stakeholders will be used to inform resources to support systems change to facilitate CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Ethics approval was obtained from Monash Health (RES-23-0000-275Q).</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01293-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Within Australia, there is increasing recognition of the importance and value of patient and public involvement, or consumer and community involvement (CCI), in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Despite this and policy mandates, there has been little behavioural and systems change to embed and support CCI. Often, this is relegated to tokenistic gestures rather than authentic partnerships. The aim of this national project is to use evidence-generated knowledge co-led by consumers, community members, researchers and clinicians to embed CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement.
Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Learning Health System framework underpin the project to facilitate an iterative process to change systems and individual behaviour towards adoption of CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Key stakeholder groups include research translation centres, funding bodies, clinicians, professional staff involved in healthcare improvement, researchers and consumers and community members. To understand the attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, behaviours, system barriers and facilitators around CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement, semi-structured interviews and surveys will be conducted across key stakeholder groups. Template analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to report data from the national survey respectively prior to triangulation of data. Findings will be reported through traditional scientific outputs such as conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Other anticipated outputs include policy briefs, organizational implementation toolkits and resources and a co-designed digital knowledge hub to support individuals with implementation and scale up across stakeholders.
Discussion: This study will build on considerable stakeholder engagement and prior priority-setting and includes broad and detailed consideration of perspectives from diverse stakeholders at a national level. Robust methodological frameworks, co-design and partnership with stakeholders will be used to inform resources to support systems change to facilitate CCI in health and medical research and healthcare improvement. Ethics approval was obtained from Monash Health (RES-23-0000-275Q).
背景:在澳大利亚,人们越来越认识到患者和公众参与,或消费者和社区参与(CCI)在健康和医学研究以及改善医疗保健方面的重要性和价值。尽管有这样的政策要求,但嵌入和支持CCI的行为和系统变化很少。通常,这只是象征性的姿态,而不是真正的伙伴关系。这一国家项目的目的是利用由消费者、社区成员、研究人员和临床医生共同领导的循证知识,将CCI纳入卫生和医学研究以及改善卫生保健。方法:实施研究综合框架和学习型卫生系统框架支持该项目,以促进在卫生和医学研究和卫生保健改善中采用CCI的系统和个人行为的迭代过程。主要利益相关者群体包括研究翻译中心、资助机构、临床医生、参与改善医疗保健的专业人员、研究人员和消费者以及社区成员。为了了解在健康和医学研究以及医疗保健改善方面围绕CCI的态度、知识、信念、行为、系统障碍和促进因素,将在主要利益相关者群体中进行半结构化访谈和调查。在对数据进行三角测量之前,将分别使用模板分析和描述性统计来报告全国调查的数据。研究结果将通过会议报告和同行评议出版物等传统的科学产出进行报告。其他预期产出包括政策简报、组织实施工具包和资源,以及一个共同设计的数字知识中心,以支持个人在利益相关者之间实施和扩大规模。讨论:本研究将建立在大量利益相关者参与和事先确定优先事项的基础上,并包括在国家层面广泛而详细地考虑来自不同利益相关者的观点。将使用强有力的方法框架、共同设计和与利益攸关方的伙伴关系来告知资源,以支持系统变革,促进卫生和医学研究中的CCI以及卫生保健改善。获得Monash Health (RES-23-0000-275Q)的伦理批准。
期刊介绍:
Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.