Comparison of Readmission, Discharge Location and Mortality over Three Years Post-Discharge Between Patients Diagnosed with Hospital-Acquired Malnutrition and Those Malnourished on Admission-A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study in Five Facilities.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13040364
Breanne Hosking, Lynda Ross, Angela Vivanti, Sally Courtice, Amanda Henderson, Fiona Naumann, Rachel Stoney, Michelle Palmer
{"title":"Comparison of Readmission, Discharge Location and Mortality over Three Years Post-Discharge Between Patients Diagnosed with Hospital-Acquired Malnutrition and Those Malnourished on Admission-A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study in Five Facilities.","authors":"Breanne Hosking, Lynda Ross, Angela Vivanti, Sally Courtice, Amanda Henderson, Fiona Naumann, Rachel Stoney, Michelle Palmer","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13040364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Increased mortality and poor post-discharge outcomes are common in malnourished inpatients. It is unknown whether post-discharge outcomes differ between patients with hospital-acquired malnutrition (HAM) or malnutrition present on admission (MPOA), which could impact nutrition processes within healthcare systems and hospital-acquired-complication policy. This retrospective matched case-control study compared mortality, discharge location and readmission at 3-, 12- and 36-months post-discharge between HAM and MPOA patients. <b>Methods:</b> The eligible patients were ≥18 years, malnourished and stayed in hospital for >14 days between 2015 and 2019. HAM patients were 1:1 matched with MPOA patients for age (±3 years), sex, facility and year of admission and further categorised by age group (18 < 65, ≥65 years). The data were obtained from medical records included demographics, mortality, discharge location and readmissions. Statistical tests were used to compare the groups. <b>Results:</b> There were 350 eligible patients (n = 175 HAM, 65 ± 18 years, 37%F, 88% moderately malnourished, 71% from hospitals with >500 beds). HAM and MPOA patients had similar post-discharge mortality (n = 51/175 (29%) vs. n = 64/175 (37%), <i>p</i> > 0.172) and discharge locations (n = 101/111 (81%) vs. n = 91/124 (82%) resided at home, <i>p</i> = 1.00) at 36 months. Of those readmitted to hospital (n= 268/350, 77%), days hospitalised post-discharge (HAM:17(6-40) vs. MPOA:19(8-39)) and number of readmissions (HAM:2(1-4) vs. MPOA:2(1-5)) were similar at 36 months (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, older MPOA patients were more likely to readmit within 30 days (<i>p</i> = 0.007). <b>Conclusions:</b> Mortality was high but similar between MPOA and HAM patients up to 36 months post-discharge. Discharge location and readmissions were also similar between the groups, except that older MPOA patients were more likely to readmit to hospital within 30 days than older HAM patients. Mechanisms, such as nutrition policies and procedures, implementation of post-discharge nutrition interventions or allocation of post-discharge resources, should be explored further and should consider all long-stay malnourished patients, particularly those aged ≥ 65 years, to reduce preventable patient harm associated with malnutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Increased mortality and poor post-discharge outcomes are common in malnourished inpatients. It is unknown whether post-discharge outcomes differ between patients with hospital-acquired malnutrition (HAM) or malnutrition present on admission (MPOA), which could impact nutrition processes within healthcare systems and hospital-acquired-complication policy. This retrospective matched case-control study compared mortality, discharge location and readmission at 3-, 12- and 36-months post-discharge between HAM and MPOA patients. Methods: The eligible patients were ≥18 years, malnourished and stayed in hospital for >14 days between 2015 and 2019. HAM patients were 1:1 matched with MPOA patients for age (±3 years), sex, facility and year of admission and further categorised by age group (18 < 65, ≥65 years). The data were obtained from medical records included demographics, mortality, discharge location and readmissions. Statistical tests were used to compare the groups. Results: There were 350 eligible patients (n = 175 HAM, 65 ± 18 years, 37%F, 88% moderately malnourished, 71% from hospitals with >500 beds). HAM and MPOA patients had similar post-discharge mortality (n = 51/175 (29%) vs. n = 64/175 (37%), p > 0.172) and discharge locations (n = 101/111 (81%) vs. n = 91/124 (82%) resided at home, p = 1.00) at 36 months. Of those readmitted to hospital (n= 268/350, 77%), days hospitalised post-discharge (HAM:17(6-40) vs. MPOA:19(8-39)) and number of readmissions (HAM:2(1-4) vs. MPOA:2(1-5)) were similar at 36 months (p > 0.05). However, older MPOA patients were more likely to readmit within 30 days (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Mortality was high but similar between MPOA and HAM patients up to 36 months post-discharge. Discharge location and readmissions were also similar between the groups, except that older MPOA patients were more likely to readmit to hospital within 30 days than older HAM patients. Mechanisms, such as nutrition policies and procedures, implementation of post-discharge nutrition interventions or allocation of post-discharge resources, should be explored further and should consider all long-stay malnourished patients, particularly those aged ≥ 65 years, to reduce preventable patient harm associated with malnutrition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断为医院获得性营养不良和入院时营养不良的患者再入院、出院地点和出院后3年死亡率的比较——5家医院的回顾性匹配病例对照研究
背景/目的:在营养不良的住院患者中,死亡率增加和出院后预后差是很常见的。目前尚不清楚医院获得性营养不良(HAM)和入院时存在营养不良(MPOA)的患者出院后的结果是否不同,这可能会影响医疗保健系统内的营养过程和医院获得性并发症政策。这项回顾性匹配病例对照研究比较了HAM和MPOA患者出院后3个月、12个月和36个月的死亡率、出院地点和再入院情况。方法:符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,营养不良,2015 - 2019年住院时间为bbb14 d。HAM患者与MPOA患者按年龄(±3岁)、性别、设施和入院年份进行1:1匹配,并进一步按年龄组(18 < 65岁,≥65岁)进行分类。数据来自医疗记录,包括人口统计、死亡率、出院地点和再入院情况。采用统计学检验对两组进行比较。结果:350例符合条件的患者(n = 175例HAM, 65±18岁,37%F, 88%中度营养不良,71%来自bbb500张床位的医院)。在36个月时,HAM和MPOA患者的出院后死亡率(n = 51/175 (29%) vs. n = 64/175 (37%), p = 0.172)和出院地点(n = 101/111 (81%) vs. n = 91/124(82%)住在家里,p = 1.00)相似。在再次入院的患者中(n= 268/ 350,77%),出院后住院天数(HAM:17(6-40) vs MPOA:19(8-39))和再入院次数(HAM:2(1-4) vs MPOA:2(1-5))在36个月时相似(p < 0.05)。然而,老年MPOA患者更有可能在30天内再入院(p = 0.007)。结论:MPOA和HAM患者出院后36个月的死亡率高但相似。两组之间的出院地点和再入院率也相似,除了老年MPOA患者比老年HAM患者更有可能在30天内再入院。机制,如营养政策和程序,出院后营养干预措施的实施或出院后资源的分配,应进一步探索,并应考虑所有长期住院的营养不良患者,特别是年龄≥65岁的患者,以减少与营养不良相关的可预防的患者伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence and Comorbidities of Self-Reported Mental Health Disorders Among Primary Healthcare Attendees in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. From Tool to Agent: A Semi-Systematic Review of Human-AI Alignment and a Proposed Tiered Healing Ecosystem for Mental Health. Global Stakeholder Perspectives on Real-World Data and Evidence in Health Technology Assessment: An Exploratory Study. Oral Health Trends and Challenges in North and West Africa: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies. Digital Stress: Insights from Bibliometric, Scientometric, Meta-Analytic and Thematic Analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1