Effects of Critical Thinking Disposition, Clinical Judgement, and Nurse-Physician Collaboration on Triage Competency Among Triage Nurses.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13040405
Ji-Won Song, Hyung-Ran Park
{"title":"Effects of Critical Thinking Disposition, Clinical Judgement, and Nurse-Physician Collaboration on Triage Competency Among Triage Nurses.","authors":"Ji-Won Song, Hyung-Ran Park","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13040405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between critical thinking disposition, clinical judgement, nurse-physician collaboration, and triage competency among triage nurses and to identify the factors influencing triage competency. <b>Methods</b>: This descriptive survey study included 152 triage nurses from one tertiary and six general hospitals. Data were collected from 1 September to 1 November 2023 and analysed using SPSS 29.0. <b>Results</b>: Triage competency was positively correlated with critical thinking disposition (<i>r</i> = 0.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and clinical judgement (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while it was negatively correlated with nurse-physician collaboration (<i>r</i> = -0.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The hierarchical regression analysis showed that five variables, critical thinking disposition, clinical judgement, nurse-physician collaboration, education level, and years of experience in the emergency department, significantly influenced triage competency. The explanatory power of these variables for triage competency was 63.7% (F = 27.52, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Based on the findings, increasing the level of cooperation and fostering more cooperative relationships between nurses and physicians are necessary measures to improve their triage competency.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between critical thinking disposition, clinical judgement, nurse-physician collaboration, and triage competency among triage nurses and to identify the factors influencing triage competency. Methods: This descriptive survey study included 152 triage nurses from one tertiary and six general hospitals. Data were collected from 1 September to 1 November 2023 and analysed using SPSS 29.0. Results: Triage competency was positively correlated with critical thinking disposition (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and clinical judgement (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), while it was negatively correlated with nurse-physician collaboration (r = -0.52, p < 0.001). The hierarchical regression analysis showed that five variables, critical thinking disposition, clinical judgement, nurse-physician collaboration, education level, and years of experience in the emergency department, significantly influenced triage competency. The explanatory power of these variables for triage competency was 63.7% (F = 27.52, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Based on the findings, increasing the level of cooperation and fostering more cooperative relationships between nurses and physicians are necessary measures to improve their triage competency.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判性思维倾向、临床判断和护医合作对分诊护士分诊能力的影响。
背景/目的:本研究旨在探讨分诊护士批判性思维倾向、临床判断、护医合作与分诊能力的关系,并探讨影响分诊能力的因素。方法:对1所三级医院和6所综合医院的152名分诊护士进行描述性调查研究。数据于2023年9月1日至11月1日收集,并使用SPSS 29.0进行分析。结果:分诊能力与批判性思维倾向呈正相关(r = 0.55, p < 0.001),与临床判断呈正相关(r = 0.61, p < 0.001),与护医协作呈负相关(r = -0.52, p < 0.001)。层次回归分析显示,批判性思维倾向、临床判断、护医合作、教育程度、急诊科工作年限等5个变量对分诊能力有显著影响。这些变量对分诊能力的解释能力为63.7% (F = 27.52, p < 0.001)。结论:根据研究结果,提高护理人员与医生之间的合作水平,培养更多的合作关系是提高护理人员分诊能力的必要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence and Comorbidities of Self-Reported Mental Health Disorders Among Primary Healthcare Attendees in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. From Tool to Agent: A Semi-Systematic Review of Human-AI Alignment and a Proposed Tiered Healing Ecosystem for Mental Health. Global Stakeholder Perspectives on Real-World Data and Evidence in Health Technology Assessment: An Exploratory Study. Oral Health Trends and Challenges in North and West Africa: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies. Digital Stress: Insights from Bibliometric, Scientometric, Meta-Analytic and Thematic Analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1