Perceived Stress, Well-Being, and Academic Performance of University Students During the First COVID-19 Lockdown: A Study of Portuguese, Spanish, and Brazilian Students.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.3390/healthcare13040371
Alexandra Marques-Pinto, Luís Curral, Maria R Costa, Francisca Quadros, Saúl Neves de Jesus, Isabel Maria Martínez, António Roazzi, Sofia Oliveira
{"title":"Perceived Stress, Well-Being, and Academic Performance of University Students During the First COVID-19 Lockdown: A Study of Portuguese, Spanish, and Brazilian Students.","authors":"Alexandra Marques-Pinto, Luís Curral, Maria R Costa, Francisca Quadros, Saúl Neves de Jesus, Isabel Maria Martínez, António Roazzi, Sofia Oliveira","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13040371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected university students globally, exacerbating their already existing academic stress. This study investigates how the first COVID-19 lockdown (March-July 2020) differently impacted Portuguese, Spanish, and Brazilian university students' perceived academic stress, personal well-being, academic engagement, and performance. <b>Methods</b>: An online survey collected responses from 1081 university students (78.17% female; Mage = 25.43 years, SD = 9.27). Qualitative data on academic stressors were analyzed using content analysis. Cross-country differences were assessed through chi-square analyses and ANOVAs. Hypotheses were tested with a mediation path analysis. <b>Results</b>: Emotional distress emerged as the most prevalent stressor (54%). The results evidence differences in how students from the three countries experienced their academic life during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Personal and academic well-being mediated stress' effects on performance. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings underscore the need for context-tailored interventions and proactive measures to support students' academic engagement in challenging contexts, informing educators and policymakers alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected university students globally, exacerbating their already existing academic stress. This study investigates how the first COVID-19 lockdown (March-July 2020) differently impacted Portuguese, Spanish, and Brazilian university students' perceived academic stress, personal well-being, academic engagement, and performance. Methods: An online survey collected responses from 1081 university students (78.17% female; Mage = 25.43 years, SD = 9.27). Qualitative data on academic stressors were analyzed using content analysis. Cross-country differences were assessed through chi-square analyses and ANOVAs. Hypotheses were tested with a mediation path analysis. Results: Emotional distress emerged as the most prevalent stressor (54%). The results evidence differences in how students from the three countries experienced their academic life during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Personal and academic well-being mediated stress' effects on performance. Conclusions: These findings underscore the need for context-tailored interventions and proactive measures to support students' academic engagement in challenging contexts, informing educators and policymakers alike.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间大学生的压力感知、幸福感和学习成绩:对葡萄牙、西班牙和巴西学生的研究。
背景/目的:新冠肺炎疫情对全球大学生产生了深刻影响,加剧了他们本已存在的学业压力。本研究调查了第一次COVID-19封锁(2020年3月至7月)如何不同地影响葡萄牙、西班牙和巴西大学生的学术压力、个人幸福感、学术参与和表现。方法:对1081名大学生进行网络调查,其中女生78.17%;年龄= 25.43岁,SD = 9.27)。采用内容分析法对学业压力源的定性数据进行分析。通过卡方分析和方差分析评估跨国差异。采用中介路径分析对假设进行检验。结果:情绪困扰是最普遍的压力源(54%)。结果表明,在第一次新冠肺炎封锁期间,这三个国家的学生在学术生活中的经历存在差异。个人和学业幸福感介导压力对成绩的影响。结论:这些发现强调需要针对具体情况采取干预措施和积极措施,以支持学生在具有挑战性的环境中参与学业,为教育工作者和政策制定者提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Homozygous Truncating CD8A Variant (p.Arg107Ter) in a Patient with Recurrent Sinopulmonary Infections: A Case Report and Literature Review. Design Consistency and Aesthetic Experience in Digital Health Communication: A Mixed-Method Study of Lifestyle Medicine Product Ecosystems. Usability of a Patch-Type Ultrasound System for Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring: A Simulation Study in Anesthesiologists. Perceptions of the Body in Cerebral Palsy: Voices of Family Caregivers. Real-Time Integration of an AI-Based ECG Interpretation System in the Emergency Department: A Pragmatic Alternating-Day Study of Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Process Metrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1