Assessment of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty for Stent Thrombosis: SPARTAN-ST Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.3390/jcdd12020059
Ioannis Merinopoulos, Bhalraam U, Tharusha Gunawardena, Natasha Corballis, Rajkumar Natarajan, Upul Wickramarachchi, Clint Maart, Sulfi Sreekumar, Chris Sawh, Johannes Reinhold, Trevor Wistow, Alisdair Ryding, Timothy Gilbert, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Simon C Eccleshall
{"title":"Assessment of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty for Stent Thrombosis: SPARTAN-ST Study.","authors":"Ioannis Merinopoulos, Bhalraam U, Tharusha Gunawardena, Natasha Corballis, Rajkumar Natarajan, Upul Wickramarachchi, Clint Maart, Sulfi Sreekumar, Chris Sawh, Johannes Reinhold, Trevor Wistow, Alisdair Ryding, Timothy Gilbert, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Simon C Eccleshall","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12020059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no data regarding the outcomes of patients with stent thrombosis (ST) being treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of patients with ST treated with DCB vs. a drug eluting stent (DES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this registry analysis, we identified all patients treated for ST in our institution from June 2011 until November 2019. We excluded patients who died in the cath lab, patients with uncrossable lesions, and patients treated with thrombectomy only. Patient outcomes were obtained from Hospital Episodes Statistics from NHS England. The primary endpoint of this study was the composite of cardiovascular mortality, acute coronary syndrome, or target lesion revascularisation. The data were analysed with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimator plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients were identified; 92 treated with DCB-only, 36 with balloon angioplasty (BA), 26 with DES, and 19 with a combination of DES and DCB. We compared the outcomes of 92 patients with DCB versus 20 patients with DES, all of which had presented with late or very late ST. There was no difference between DCB and DES in terms of the primary endpoint (<i>p</i> = 0.06). Multivariate analysis identified diabetes (adverse) and the use of GPIIbIIIa inhibitor (favourable) as the only independent predictors of the primary endpoint. Implantation of a DES was independently associated with worse cardiovascular mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study assessing the outcomes of patients with ST treated with DCB only. It has demonstrated that DCBs are an attractive therapeutic option with a tendency towards favourable outcomes when compared to DESs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12020059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no data regarding the outcomes of patients with stent thrombosis (ST) being treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of patients with ST treated with DCB vs. a drug eluting stent (DES).

Methods: In this registry analysis, we identified all patients treated for ST in our institution from June 2011 until November 2019. We excluded patients who died in the cath lab, patients with uncrossable lesions, and patients treated with thrombectomy only. Patient outcomes were obtained from Hospital Episodes Statistics from NHS England. The primary endpoint of this study was the composite of cardiovascular mortality, acute coronary syndrome, or target lesion revascularisation. The data were analysed with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimator plots.

Results: A total of 173 patients were identified; 92 treated with DCB-only, 36 with balloon angioplasty (BA), 26 with DES, and 19 with a combination of DES and DCB. We compared the outcomes of 92 patients with DCB versus 20 patients with DES, all of which had presented with late or very late ST. There was no difference between DCB and DES in terms of the primary endpoint (p = 0.06). Multivariate analysis identified diabetes (adverse) and the use of GPIIbIIIa inhibitor (favourable) as the only independent predictors of the primary endpoint. Implantation of a DES was independently associated with worse cardiovascular mortality.

Conclusions: This is the first study assessing the outcomes of patients with ST treated with DCB only. It has demonstrated that DCBs are an attractive therapeutic option with a tendency towards favourable outcomes when compared to DESs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
Beyond Survival: Assessing Quality of Life, Activity Level, and Ethnic Diversity in Aortic Dissection Survivors. Invasive Physiological Assessment of Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review. Prognostic Role of Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. The Cross-Talk Between the Heart and the Liver: The Involvement of the Mitral Valve as a Novel Actor upon the Ancient Scene of Liver Cirrhosis. Indications, Management, and Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Coronary Occlusion Treated with Percutaneous Revascularization-A Single-Center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1