Emma Altobelli, Paolo Matteo Angeletti, Marco Ciancaglini, Reimondo Petrocelli
{"title":"The Future of Breast Cancer Organized Screening Program Through Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Emma Altobelli, Paolo Matteo Angeletti, Marco Ciancaglini, Reimondo Petrocelli","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13040378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate whether artificial intelligence integrated into breast cancer screening work strategies could help resolve some diagnostic issues that still remain. <b>Methods</b>: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were consulted. The literature research was updated to 28 May 2024. The PRISMA method of selecting articles was used. The articles were classified according to the type of publication (meta-analysis, trial, prospective, and retrospective studies); moreover, retrospective studies were based on citizen recruitment (organized screening vs. spontaneous screening and a combination of both). <b>Results</b>: Meta-analyses showed that AI had an effective reduction in the radiologists' reading time of radiological images, with a variation from 17 to 91%. Furthermore, they highlighted how the use of artificial intelligence software improved the diagnostic accuracy. Systematic review speculated that AI could reduce false negatives and positives and detect subtle abnormalities missed by human observers. DR with AI results from organized screening showed a higher recall rate, specificity, and PPV. Data from opportunistic screening found that AI could reduce interval cancer with a corresponding reduction in serious outcome. Nevertheless, the analysis of this review suggests that the study of breast density and interval cancer still requires numerous applications. <b>Conclusions</b>: Artificial intelligence appears to be a promising technology for health, with consequences that can have a major impact on healthcare systems. Where screening is opportunistic and involves only one human reader, the use of AI can increase diagnostic performance enough to equal that of double human reading.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13040378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate whether artificial intelligence integrated into breast cancer screening work strategies could help resolve some diagnostic issues that still remain. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were consulted. The literature research was updated to 28 May 2024. The PRISMA method of selecting articles was used. The articles were classified according to the type of publication (meta-analysis, trial, prospective, and retrospective studies); moreover, retrospective studies were based on citizen recruitment (organized screening vs. spontaneous screening and a combination of both). Results: Meta-analyses showed that AI had an effective reduction in the radiologists' reading time of radiological images, with a variation from 17 to 91%. Furthermore, they highlighted how the use of artificial intelligence software improved the diagnostic accuracy. Systematic review speculated that AI could reduce false negatives and positives and detect subtle abnormalities missed by human observers. DR with AI results from organized screening showed a higher recall rate, specificity, and PPV. Data from opportunistic screening found that AI could reduce interval cancer with a corresponding reduction in serious outcome. Nevertheless, the analysis of this review suggests that the study of breast density and interval cancer still requires numerous applications. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence appears to be a promising technology for health, with consequences that can have a major impact on healthcare systems. Where screening is opportunistic and involves only one human reader, the use of AI can increase diagnostic performance enough to equal that of double human reading.
目的:本综述的目的是评估将人工智能整合到乳腺癌筛查工作策略中是否有助于解决一些仍然存在的诊断问题。方法:查阅PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus。文献研究更新至2024年5月28日。采用PRISMA选材法。文章根据发表类型(荟萃分析、试验、前瞻性和回顾性研究)进行分类;此外,回顾性研究基于公民招募(有组织筛查与自发筛查以及两者的结合)。结果:荟萃分析显示,人工智能有效地减少了放射科医生阅读放射图像的时间,从17%到91%不等。此外,他们强调了人工智能软件的使用如何提高了诊断的准确性。系统回顾推测,人工智能可以减少假阴性和假阳性,并发现人类观察者遗漏的细微异常。有组织筛选的DR与AI结果显示更高的召回率、特异性和PPV。机会性筛查的数据发现,人工智能可以减少间隔期癌症,相应减少严重后果。然而,本综述的分析表明,乳腺密度和间期癌的研究仍然需要大量的应用。结论:人工智能似乎是一项很有前途的健康技术,其后果可能对医疗保健系统产生重大影响。如果筛查是机会性的,并且只涉及一名人类读者,那么人工智能的使用可以提高诊断性能,足以达到两名人类阅读的水平。
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.