Familial vs sporadic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1007/s00415-025-12970-z
Alice J M Jelmoni, Ghada Albuainain, Gianfranco Gaudiano, Gianluca Sorrento, David F Tang-Wai, Alfonso Fasano
{"title":"Familial vs sporadic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study.","authors":"Alice J M Jelmoni, Ghada Albuainain, Gianfranco Gaudiano, Gianluca Sorrento, David F Tang-Wai, Alfonso Fasano","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12970-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a syndrome characterized by the buildup of cerebrospinal fluid that results in the clinic triad of gait impairment, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment. NPH can be categorized as secondary, idiopathic, or familial. Here, we report a comparison of sporadic to familial types from clinical, radiological, and surgery response aspects as well as a novel gene mutation as a cause of familial NPH.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed 139 patients evaluated for NPH at our center from 2010 to 2022. Ninety-five patients diagnosed with probable (n = 26) or definite (n = 69) iNPH were included. Clinical, radiological, and gait data were retrospectively collected. In patients with a positive familial history of NPH, we defined the inheritance pattern when possible. The results of performed genetic tests were reported.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Nine patients (9.5%) had a familial history of NPH. Familial and sporadic groups were largely comparable in age, sex, and disease duration. However, familial cases had better cognitive scores (p = 0.022) and a higher prevalence of upper-limb action tremor (56% vs. 14%; p = 0.008). No significant differences were noted in radiological markers, and both groups showed a positive response to ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Whole exome sequencing identified a novel pathogenic NEIL1 variant in twin patients with familial NPH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Familial NPH occurred in roughly 1 in 10 reviewed iNPH cases and demonstrates better cognition and increased tremor incidence compared to sporadic cases but otherwise similar characteristics. The genetic underpinning of these cases is heterogeneous and NEIL1 might represent another associated gene.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12970-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a syndrome characterized by the buildup of cerebrospinal fluid that results in the clinic triad of gait impairment, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment. NPH can be categorized as secondary, idiopathic, or familial. Here, we report a comparison of sporadic to familial types from clinical, radiological, and surgery response aspects as well as a novel gene mutation as a cause of familial NPH.

Method: We analyzed 139 patients evaluated for NPH at our center from 2010 to 2022. Ninety-five patients diagnosed with probable (n = 26) or definite (n = 69) iNPH were included. Clinical, radiological, and gait data were retrospectively collected. In patients with a positive familial history of NPH, we defined the inheritance pattern when possible. The results of performed genetic tests were reported.

Result: Nine patients (9.5%) had a familial history of NPH. Familial and sporadic groups were largely comparable in age, sex, and disease duration. However, familial cases had better cognitive scores (p = 0.022) and a higher prevalence of upper-limb action tremor (56% vs. 14%; p = 0.008). No significant differences were noted in radiological markers, and both groups showed a positive response to ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Whole exome sequencing identified a novel pathogenic NEIL1 variant in twin patients with familial NPH.

Conclusions: Familial NPH occurred in roughly 1 in 10 reviewed iNPH cases and demonstrates better cognition and increased tremor incidence compared to sporadic cases but otherwise similar characteristics. The genetic underpinning of these cases is heterogeneous and NEIL1 might represent another associated gene.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Advancements in genetic research and RNA therapy strategies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): current progress and future prospects. Cervical spinal cord gray matter damage predicts disability worsening in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Elevated suicide risk in individuals with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Familial vs sporadic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study. Giuseppe Levi (1872-1965).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1