Closer to home: Managing more than three rib fractures at level IV trauma centers.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000004575
Adam Lizak, Anthony Allsbrook, Rebecca Wilde-Onia, Lisa Robins, Rebecca Boyer, James Cipolla, Peter Thomas, Roberto Castillo, Maxwell A Braverman
{"title":"Closer to home: Managing more than three rib fractures at level IV trauma centers.","authors":"Adam Lizak, Anthony Allsbrook, Rebecca Wilde-Onia, Lisa Robins, Rebecca Boyer, James Cipolla, Peter Thomas, Roberto Castillo, Maxwell A Braverman","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rib fractures remain a significant source of trauma admissions. In 2020, the Pennsylvania Trauma System Foundation standards changed to allow patients with more than three rib fractures to be admitted to level IV centers. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with more than three uncomplicated rib fractures admitted to level IV trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our network database was queried for patients with isolated uncomplicated rib fractures between 2018 and 2022. Patients were stratified based on evaluation before or after the change in standards. Patients evaluated at level IV centers were compared for demographics, injury characteristics, transfer rate, and outcomes. Finally, 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create a matched group of patients with more than three rib fractures to assess outcomes based on admission to level IV versus level I/II centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,070 patients with isolated rib fractures were admitted over the study period. Level IV centers evaluated 360 patients with 132 (36.6%) and 228 (63.3%) in the pre- and poststandard change periods. There was a significant reduction in transfers for isolated rib fractures (56% vs. 21% p < 0.01). Compared with patients with three or less rib fractures, those with more than three fractures had similar hospital length of stay (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 3 [2-5] vs. 2 [1-4]; p = 0.29) and mortality (0% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.22). After propensity match, there was no difference in age (median [IQR], 71 [60-81] vs. 73 [65-85]; p = 0.24), injury characteristics, hospital length of stay (median [IQR], 2.5 [2-5] vs. 2 [1-4]; p = 0.37), and mortality (1.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Change in state admission standards allowed for a reduction in transfer of patients with more than three isolated rib fractures. In a group of matched patients with more than three rib fractures, level IV centers had similar outcomes to level I or II centers.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Clinical Research, Retrospective Study; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rib fractures remain a significant source of trauma admissions. In 2020, the Pennsylvania Trauma System Foundation standards changed to allow patients with more than three rib fractures to be admitted to level IV centers. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with more than three uncomplicated rib fractures admitted to level IV trauma centers.

Methods: Our network database was queried for patients with isolated uncomplicated rib fractures between 2018 and 2022. Patients were stratified based on evaluation before or after the change in standards. Patients evaluated at level IV centers were compared for demographics, injury characteristics, transfer rate, and outcomes. Finally, 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create a matched group of patients with more than three rib fractures to assess outcomes based on admission to level IV versus level I/II centers.

Results: A total of 1,070 patients with isolated rib fractures were admitted over the study period. Level IV centers evaluated 360 patients with 132 (36.6%) and 228 (63.3%) in the pre- and poststandard change periods. There was a significant reduction in transfers for isolated rib fractures (56% vs. 21% p < 0.01). Compared with patients with three or less rib fractures, those with more than three fractures had similar hospital length of stay (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 3 [2-5] vs. 2 [1-4]; p = 0.29) and mortality (0% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.22). After propensity match, there was no difference in age (median [IQR], 71 [60-81] vs. 73 [65-85]; p = 0.24), injury characteristics, hospital length of stay (median [IQR], 2.5 [2-5] vs. 2 [1-4]; p = 0.37), and mortality (1.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.30).

Conclusion: Change in state admission standards allowed for a reduction in transfer of patients with more than three isolated rib fractures. In a group of matched patients with more than three rib fractures, level IV centers had similar outcomes to level I or II centers.

Level of evidence: Clinical Research, Retrospective Study; Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
期刊最新文献
Closer to home: Managing more than three rib fractures at level IV trauma centers. How many minutes matter: Association between time saved with air medical transport and survival in trauma patients. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: What You Need to Know. Not all call is created equally: The impact of culture and sex on burnout related to in-house call. Predictive value of platelet function assays in traumatic brain injury patients on antiplatelet therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1