The Reconstructed Individual Patient Data from Kaplan-Meier (IPDfromKM) Method for Non-Inferiority Analyses: A New Potential Application.

IF 2 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.3390/mps8010013
Eugenia Piragine, Sabrina Trippoli, Sara Veneziano, Andrea Messori, Vincenzo Calderone
{"title":"The Reconstructed Individual Patient Data from Kaplan-Meier (IPDfromKM) Method for Non-Inferiority Analyses: A New Potential Application.","authors":"Eugenia Piragine, Sabrina Trippoli, Sara Veneziano, Andrea Messori, Vincenzo Calderone","doi":"10.3390/mps8010013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The IPDfromKM method, or Shiny method, is an artificial intelligence tool that enables indirect comparisons between studies by reconstructing individual patient data (IPD) from Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. The IPDfromKM method is generally used for superiority analyses, but a further application could be represented by non-inferiority analyses. However, there are no studies supporting this methodological hypothesis. The aim of this work was to validate the IPDfromKM method for non-inferiority analyses by \"exploiting\" the well-described non-inferiority of implantable devices occluding the left atrial appendage compared to oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic review searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the PubMed database and found five studies. The R software (version 4.3.3) was used to perform a standard survival analysis comparing Watchman and Amlet devices with warfarin. The hazard ratio (HR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was the main parameter of our analysis. The results confirmed the non-inferiority of Amlet and Watchman compared to warfarin (HR of Watchman vs. warfarin: 1.23, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.9; HR of Amlet vs. warfarin: 1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.80). Therefore, we proposed a new application of the IPDfromKM method that could be potentially relevant in decision-making for the management of this common cardiac arrhythmia and a wide range of other pathological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8010013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The IPDfromKM method, or Shiny method, is an artificial intelligence tool that enables indirect comparisons between studies by reconstructing individual patient data (IPD) from Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. The IPDfromKM method is generally used for superiority analyses, but a further application could be represented by non-inferiority analyses. However, there are no studies supporting this methodological hypothesis. The aim of this work was to validate the IPDfromKM method for non-inferiority analyses by "exploiting" the well-described non-inferiority of implantable devices occluding the left atrial appendage compared to oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic review searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the PubMed database and found five studies. The R software (version 4.3.3) was used to perform a standard survival analysis comparing Watchman and Amlet devices with warfarin. The hazard ratio (HR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was the main parameter of our analysis. The results confirmed the non-inferiority of Amlet and Watchman compared to warfarin (HR of Watchman vs. warfarin: 1.23, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.9; HR of Amlet vs. warfarin: 1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.80). Therefore, we proposed a new application of the IPDfromKM method that could be potentially relevant in decision-making for the management of this common cardiac arrhythmia and a wide range of other pathological conditions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Kaplan-Meier (IPDfromKM)方法的非劣效性分析:一种新的潜在应用。
IPDfromKM方法,或Shiny方法,是一种人工智能工具,通过从Kaplan-Meier (KM)曲线重建个体患者数据(IPD),实现研究之间的间接比较。IPDfromKM方法通常用于优势分析,但进一步的应用可以通过非劣效分析来表示。然而,没有研究支持这种方法论假设。这项工作的目的是验证IPDfromKM方法的非劣效性分析,通过“利用”在房颤患者中,与口服抗凝剂相比,阻塞左心房附件的植入式装置具有良好的非劣效性。我们对PubMed数据库中的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾,发现了5项研究。使用R软件(版本4.3.3)对Watchman和Amlet装置与华法林进行标准生存分析。风险比(HR), 95%置信区间(CI)是我们分析的主要参数。结果证实Amlet和Watchman与华法林相比无劣效性(Watchman vs.华法林HR: 1.23, 95% CI 0.80 ~ 1.9;Amlet与华法林的HR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.61 ~ 1.80)。因此,我们提出了一种新的IPDfromKM方法的应用,这可能与这种常见心律失常和广泛的其他病理状况的管理决策有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conventional Versus Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors ≤ 20 mm: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (D-CURE Trial). Optimisation of a Caprylic Acid-Based Protocol for IgG Purification from Baboon (Papio anubis) Serum. Biological Functional Class Enrichment Analysis with R, an Annotated Tutorial for Bench Scientists. In Vitro 3D Model of Human Endometrial Stromal and Trophoblast Cells: Techniques for an Optimized Formation and Cryopreservation of Spheroids. A Protocol for Regulating Protein Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Using NMR-Guided Mutagenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1