FRAIL PARTICIPANTS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE SHOCK Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002517
Theodora K Ntaidou, Vassilis G Giannakoulis, Eleni Papoutsi, Eleni A Vavouraki, Evangelia Theodorou, Georgios Papathanakos, Ioanna Dimopoulou, Christina Routsi, Anastasia Kotanidou, Ilias I Siempos
{"title":"FRAIL PARTICIPANTS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME.","authors":"Theodora K Ntaidou, Vassilis G Giannakoulis, Eleni Papoutsi, Eleni A Vavouraki, Evangelia Theodorou, Georgios Papathanakos, Ioanna Dimopoulou, Christina Routsi, Anastasia Kotanidou, Ilias I Siempos","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Purpose: Observational studies showed that frailty is common in the intensive care unit and associated with poor outcomes. However, relevant data from interventional trials are scarce, and it is unknown whether outcomes improved over time. We endeavored to estimate temporal trends of representation and outcomes of frail participants in randomized controlled trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of five ARDS Network and PETAL Network trials published between 2006 and 2019. Based on requirement for everyday assistance prior to hospitalization, we categorized participants into frail versus nonfrail. Results : Out of 3,630 participants with ARDS, 701 (19.3%) were frail. Representation of frail participants increased over time ( P = 0.001), while mortality remained stable ( P = 0.403) and as high as 39.4%. A total of 60.6% of frail participants were younger than 65 years old. Frailty was independently associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.96, P < 0.001). Frail had fewer ventilator-free days and were more likely to have subsequent disability than nonfrail participants. Conclusion: In trials of ARDS, representation of frail participants increased, while their mortality did not improve over time. The ever-increasing vulnerable group of frail participants should be taken into consideration in the design of trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":"435-440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Observational studies showed that frailty is common in the intensive care unit and associated with poor outcomes. However, relevant data from interventional trials are scarce, and it is unknown whether outcomes improved over time. We endeavored to estimate temporal trends of representation and outcomes of frail participants in randomized controlled trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of five ARDS Network and PETAL Network trials published between 2006 and 2019. Based on requirement for everyday assistance prior to hospitalization, we categorized participants into frail versus nonfrail. Results : Out of 3,630 participants with ARDS, 701 (19.3%) were frail. Representation of frail participants increased over time ( P = 0.001), while mortality remained stable ( P = 0.403) and as high as 39.4%. A total of 60.6% of frail participants were younger than 65 years old. Frailty was independently associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.96, P < 0.001). Frail had fewer ventilator-free days and were more likely to have subsequent disability than nonfrail participants. Conclusion: In trials of ARDS, representation of frail participants increased, while their mortality did not improve over time. The ever-increasing vulnerable group of frail participants should be taken into consideration in the design of trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
期刊最新文献
EFFECT OF ARTESUNATE TREATMENT ON INTESTINAL INJURY AFTER CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION IN SWINE. D 4 -CHIP REVEALS IMPAIRED T-CELL FUNCTION IN SEPSIS: INSIGHTS FROM PLASMA MICROENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS AND MITOCHONDRIAL-TARGETED THERAPY. THE MITOCHONDRIAL DIVISION INHIBITOR MDIVI-1 PROTECTED ORGAN FUNCTION AND EXTENDED THE TREATMENT WINDOW IN RATS WITH UNCONTROLLED HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK. THE NEURONAL BIOMARKER NEURON-SPECIFIC ENOLASE CORRELATES WITH THE VOLUME OF LUNG CONTUSION IN POLYTRAUMATIZED PATIENTS. GENETIC INSIGHTS INTO SEPSIS: MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION ANALYSIS OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID METABOLITES.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1