Impact of Conventional Stroke Risk Factors on Early- and Late-Onset Ischemic Stroke: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048015
Kevin T K Nguyen, Huichun Xu, Brady J Gaynor, Patrick F McArdle, Timothy D O'Connor, James A Perry, Bradford B Worrall, Rainer Malik, Giorgio B Boncoraglio, Sally N Adebamowo, Ramin Zand, John W Cole, Steven J Kittner, Braxton D Mitchell
{"title":"Impact of Conventional Stroke Risk Factors on Early- and Late-Onset Ischemic Stroke: A Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Kevin T K Nguyen, Huichun Xu, Brady J Gaynor, Patrick F McArdle, Timothy D O'Connor, James A Perry, Bradford B Worrall, Rainer Malik, Giorgio B Boncoraglio, Sally N Adebamowo, Ramin Zand, John W Cole, Steven J Kittner, Braxton D Mitchell","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke incidence is decreasing in older ages but increasing in young adults. These divergent trends are at least partially attributable not only to diverging trends in stroke risk factors but may also be due to differences in the impact of stroke risk factors at different ages. To address this latter possibility, we used Mendelian randomization to assess differences in the association of stroke risk factors between early-onset ischemic stroke ([EOS]; onset 18-59 years) and late-onset ischemic stroke ([LOS]; onset ≥60 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified genetic variants from the GWAS Catalog for use as instrumental variables to proxy conventional stroke risk factors and then estimated the effects of these variants on risk factors in younger and older individuals in the UK Biobank. We then used these estimates to estimate the causal effects of stroke risk factors on EOS (n=6728 cases) and LOS (n=9272) cases from SiGN (Stroke Genetic Network) and the EOSC (Early-Onset Stroke Consortium). Lastly, we compared odds ratios between EOS and LOS, stratified by TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) subtypes, to determine if differences between estimates could be attributed to differences in stroke subtype distributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EOS was associated with higher levels of body mass index, blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and lower levels of HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol (all <i>P</i>≤0.002), whereas LOS was associated with higher levels of systolic blood pressure (<i>P</i>=0.0001). The causal effect of body mass index on stroke was significantly stronger for EOS than for LOS (odds ratio, 1.26 versus 1.03; <i>P</i>=0.008). After the subtype-stratified analysis, the difference in causal effect sizes between EOS and LOS for body mass index diminished and was no longer significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support a causal relationship between body mass index, blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and HDL cholesterol levels with EOS and blood pressure levels in LOS. Interventions that target these traits may reduce stroke risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":"56 3","pages":"640-648"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke incidence is decreasing in older ages but increasing in young adults. These divergent trends are at least partially attributable not only to diverging trends in stroke risk factors but may also be due to differences in the impact of stroke risk factors at different ages. To address this latter possibility, we used Mendelian randomization to assess differences in the association of stroke risk factors between early-onset ischemic stroke ([EOS]; onset 18-59 years) and late-onset ischemic stroke ([LOS]; onset ≥60 years).

Methods: We identified genetic variants from the GWAS Catalog for use as instrumental variables to proxy conventional stroke risk factors and then estimated the effects of these variants on risk factors in younger and older individuals in the UK Biobank. We then used these estimates to estimate the causal effects of stroke risk factors on EOS (n=6728 cases) and LOS (n=9272) cases from SiGN (Stroke Genetic Network) and the EOSC (Early-Onset Stroke Consortium). Lastly, we compared odds ratios between EOS and LOS, stratified by TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) subtypes, to determine if differences between estimates could be attributed to differences in stroke subtype distributions.

Results: EOS was associated with higher levels of body mass index, blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and lower levels of HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol (all P≤0.002), whereas LOS was associated with higher levels of systolic blood pressure (P=0.0001). The causal effect of body mass index on stroke was significantly stronger for EOS than for LOS (odds ratio, 1.26 versus 1.03; P=0.008). After the subtype-stratified analysis, the difference in causal effect sizes between EOS and LOS for body mass index diminished and was no longer significant.

Conclusions: These results support a causal relationship between body mass index, blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and HDL cholesterol levels with EOS and blood pressure levels in LOS. Interventions that target these traits may reduce stroke risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规卒中危险因素对早、晚发型缺血性卒中的影响:一项孟德尔随机研究。
背景:脑卒中发病率在老年人中呈下降趋势,但在年轻人中呈上升趋势。这些不同的趋势至少部分归因于中风危险因素的不同趋势,也可能是由于不同年龄的中风危险因素的影响不同。为了解决后一种可能性,我们使用孟德尔随机化来评估早发性缺血性卒中([EOS];发病年龄18-59岁)和晚发性缺血性卒中([LOS];发病≥60岁)。方法:我们从GWAS目录中确定遗传变异,作为替代传统中风危险因素的工具变量,然后估计这些变异对英国生物银行中年轻人和老年人的危险因素的影响。然后,我们使用这些估计值来估计卒中危险因素对来自SiGN(卒中遗传网络)和EOSC(早发性卒中联盟)的EOS (n=6728例)和LOS (n=9272例)病例的因果影响。最后,我们比较了EOS和LOS之间的优势比,通过TOAST (ORG 10172在急性卒中治疗中的试验)亚型分层,以确定估计之间的差异是否可归因于卒中亚型分布的差异。结果:EOS与较高水平的体重指数、血压、2型糖尿病和较低水平的HDL(高密度脂蛋白)胆固醇相关(均P≤0.002),而LOS与较高水平的收缩压相关(P=0.0001)。体重指数对脑卒中的因果效应在EOS组明显强于LOS组(优势比,1.26 vs 1.03;P = 0.008)。经过亚型分层分析,EOS和LOS对体重指数的因果效应大小的差异减小,不再显著。结论:这些结果支持体重指数、血压、2型糖尿病和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平与EOS和LOS患者血压水平之间的因果关系。针对这些特征的干预措施可能会降低中风的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Predisposing Factors, Pathologies, and Precipitating Factors Causing Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Balancing Innovation and Responsibility: Ethical and Privacy Challenges in Stroke Digital Health. Toward AI-Powered Neurovascular Intervention: From Imaging to XR-Robotic Convergence. Preservation of Septo-Hippocampal Theta Oscillations via Cholinergic Protection Underlies Cognitive Recovery After Physical Exercise Post-Cardiac Arrest. Mean Motor Disconnectivity Predicts Hand Function Impairment After Stroke: Beyond Motor Cortex Output.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1