One size doesn't fit all: exploring the influence of body size, age, and sex on right ventricle size measurements.

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1186/s13089-025-00407-7
Yun Wang, Christopher G Scott, Garvan C Kane, Sorin V Pislaru, Jared G Bird, Patricia A Pellikka, Vidhu Anand
{"title":"One size doesn't fit all: exploring the influence of body size, age, and sex on right ventricle size measurements.","authors":"Yun Wang, Christopher G Scott, Garvan C Kane, Sorin V Pislaru, Jared G Bird, Patricia A Pellikka, Vidhu Anand","doi":"10.1186/s13089-025-00407-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The assessment of right ventricular (RV) size is an important part of 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Current chamber quantification guidelines provide reference values as unindexed numbers, similar for men and women. We sought to evaluate normal ranges of RV dimensions based on age, sex, body surface area (BSA), and height. Consecutive patients with \"normal echocardiogram\" between January 2011 and August 2022 at our center were retrospectively included. RV dimensions including diameter at the base and mid-ventricle level, and base-to-apex length were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1389 patients (median 43 years, 53% female) with all three measurements available, the median RV measurements, both unindexed and indexed to BSA, were: basal diameter 35.0 mm (31.0-39.0) and 18.4 mm/m<sup>2</sup> (16.5-20.3); mid diameter 28.0 mm and 14.8 mm/m<sup>2</sup> (13.1-16.6); RV length 73.0 mm (67.0-78.0) and 37.6 mm/m<sup>2</sup> (34.9-40.9). RV dimensions were larger in men than women across all age groups but similar when indexed to BSA (for basal and mid dimensions). RV length was best indexed to height. Our indexed normal values by age and sex were similar to World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RV measurements should be indexed to BSA, considering sex and age, to determine RV size and enlargement.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00407-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The assessment of right ventricular (RV) size is an important part of 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Current chamber quantification guidelines provide reference values as unindexed numbers, similar for men and women. We sought to evaluate normal ranges of RV dimensions based on age, sex, body surface area (BSA), and height. Consecutive patients with "normal echocardiogram" between January 2011 and August 2022 at our center were retrospectively included. RV dimensions including diameter at the base and mid-ventricle level, and base-to-apex length were measured.

Results: Of 1389 patients (median 43 years, 53% female) with all three measurements available, the median RV measurements, both unindexed and indexed to BSA, were: basal diameter 35.0 mm (31.0-39.0) and 18.4 mm/m2 (16.5-20.3); mid diameter 28.0 mm and 14.8 mm/m2 (13.1-16.6); RV length 73.0 mm (67.0-78.0) and 37.6 mm/m2 (34.9-40.9). RV dimensions were larger in men than women across all age groups but similar when indexed to BSA (for basal and mid dimensions). RV length was best indexed to height. Our indexed normal values by age and sex were similar to World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) cohort.

Conclusions: RV measurements should be indexed to BSA, considering sex and age, to determine RV size and enlargement.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个尺寸不适合所有:探索身体尺寸,年龄和性别对右心室尺寸测量的影响。
背景:右心室(RV)大小的评估是二维经胸超声心动图的重要组成部分。目前的腔室量化指南提供的参考值为未索引的数字,对男性和女性类似。我们试图根据年龄、性别、体表面积(BSA)和身高来评估RV尺寸的正常范围。回顾性纳入2011年1月至2022年8月在本中心连续超声心动图正常的患者。测量左心室的尺寸,包括基部和中心室的直径,以及基部到顶点的长度。结果:1389例患者(中位年龄43岁,53%女性)均可获得三项测量结果,中位RV测量值(包括未索引和与BSA索引的)分别为:基底直径35.0 mm(31.0-39.0)和18.4 mm/m2 (16.5-20.3);中径28.0 mm和14.8 mm/m2 (13.1-16.6);RV长度分别为73.0 mm(67.0 ~ 78.0)和37.6 mm/m2(34.9 ~ 40.9)。在所有年龄组中,男性的RV尺寸都大于女性,但与BSA(基础和中期尺寸)索引相似。RV长度最好与高度索引。我们按年龄和性别划分的指数化正常值与世界超声心动图联盟(WASE)队列相似。结论:RV测量应与BSA挂钩,考虑性别和年龄,以确定RV的大小和扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsies: feasible and safe use of pathology services in a resource-limited, high TB/HIV prevalence setting. Prediction of in-vitro fertilization outcome by ultrasound strain analysis and machine learning: A multi-center study. Prenatal 2D/3D Ultrasound in Fetal Dural Sinus Malformations: Case Series and Prognostic Insights. Effectiveness of obstetric point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the ADDIE training model. Estimate the severity of acute ischemic stroke by optic nerve sheath ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1