Differentiation of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas: Our Experience with Visual Analysis of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY Journal of Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.3390/jimaging11020047
Luz Maria Moran, Chao Yuan Li Cai, Alberto Ramirez, Ana Royuela
{"title":"Differentiation of Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas: Our Experience with Visual Analysis of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.","authors":"Luz Maria Moran, Chao Yuan Li Cai, Alberto Ramirez, Ana Royuela","doi":"10.3390/jimaging11020047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) from lipomas using imaging techniques is a challenge, and the biopsy with immunohistochemical determination of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) oncogene is the gold standard. We are looking for a management algorithm with the visual analysis of magnetic resonance images in these two fatty soft tissue tumors that allow us to avoid some biopsies. Two radiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently assessed various features on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in 79 patients with pathologically confirmed fatty tumors as either lipoma (MDM2 negative) or ALT (MDM2 positive). Results: The interobserver agreement for the most MRI features was moderate and the musculoskeletal radiologist accuracy for final diagnosis was 90% sensitivity and 66% specificity. Tumors with homogeneous fat signals and a maximum size < 8 cm were always lipomas (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the tumors with septa thickness ≥ 2 mm, or more than one non-fat nodule, and a maximum size ≥ 12.8 cm were typically ALTs. While those tumors with septa < 2 mm or one non-fat nodule, independently of maximum size, the diagnosis of lipoma versus ALT is uncertain and a biopsy is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11020047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) from lipomas using imaging techniques is a challenge, and the biopsy with immunohistochemical determination of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) oncogene is the gold standard. We are looking for a management algorithm with the visual analysis of magnetic resonance images in these two fatty soft tissue tumors that allow us to avoid some biopsies. Two radiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently assessed various features on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in 79 patients with pathologically confirmed fatty tumors as either lipoma (MDM2 negative) or ALT (MDM2 positive). Results: The interobserver agreement for the most MRI features was moderate and the musculoskeletal radiologist accuracy for final diagnosis was 90% sensitivity and 66% specificity. Tumors with homogeneous fat signals and a maximum size < 8 cm were always lipomas (p < 0.001), and the tumors with septa thickness ≥ 2 mm, or more than one non-fat nodule, and a maximum size ≥ 12.8 cm were typically ALTs. While those tumors with septa < 2 mm or one non-fat nodule, independently of maximum size, the diagnosis of lipoma versus ALT is uncertain and a biopsy is required.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非典型脂肪瘤与脂肪瘤的鉴别:我们对传统磁共振成像进行视觉分析的经验。
利用影像学技术鉴别非典型脂肪瘤(ALTs)和脂肪瘤是一个挑战,而组织活检和免疫组化检测小鼠双分钟2 (MDM2)致癌基因是金标准。我们正在寻找一种管理算法,对这两个脂肪性软组织肿瘤的磁共振图像进行可视化分析,使我们能够避免一些活组织检查。两名不知道最终诊断结果的放射科医生独立评估了79名病理证实为脂肪瘤(MDM2阴性)或ALT (MDM2阳性)的脂肪肿瘤患者的常规磁共振成像(MRI)的各种特征。结果:大多数MRI特征的观察者之间的一致性是中等的,肌肉骨骼放射科医生最终诊断的准确性为90%的敏感性和66%的特异性。脂肪信号均匀且最大尺寸< 8 cm的肿瘤均为脂肪瘤(p < 0.001),隔层厚度≥2 mm或多于一个非脂肪结节且最大尺寸≥12.8 cm的肿瘤为典型脂肪瘤。而那些间隔< 2mm或只有一个非脂肪结节的肿瘤,与最大大小无关,脂肪瘤与ALT的诊断是不确定的,需要活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accelerating Point Cloud Computation via Memory in Embedded Structured Light Cameras. Classification of the Surrounding Rock Based on Image Processing Analysis and Transfer Learning. MDF2Former: Multi-Scale Dual-Domain Feature Fusion Transformer for Hyperspectral Image Classification of Bacteria in Murine Wounds. Print Quality Assessment of QR Code Elements Achieved by the Digital Thermal Transfer Process. Automated Compactness Quantitative Metrics for Wrist Bone on Conventional Radiography in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Clinical Evaluation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1