Operational Definitions of Polypharmacy and Their Association with All-Cause Hospitalization Risk: A Conceptual Framework Using Administrative Databases.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13010015
Stefano Scotti, Lorenza Scotti, Federica Galimberti, Sining Xie, Manuela Casula, Elena Olmastroni
{"title":"Operational Definitions of Polypharmacy and Their Association with All-Cause Hospitalization Risk: A Conceptual Framework Using Administrative Databases.","authors":"Stefano Scotti, Lorenza Scotti, Federica Galimberti, Sining Xie, Manuela Casula, Elena Olmastroni","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of multiple medications, increases the risk of various adverse outcomes. However, the variability in definitions across the literature contributes to substantial heterogeneity. Building on the published literature, this study aimed to identify a set of operational definitions of polypharmacy applicable to administrative databases and to assess their association with all-cause hospitalization. Data from the pharmacy refill and hospitalization databases of the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Bergamo, Lombardy, were analyzed. Patients aged ≥40 with at least one reimbursed drug prescription in 2017 were included. Prescription coverage was evaluated using total defined daily doses (DDDs), and all-cause hospitalizations from January to June 2018 were considered. Definitions explored included (i) the WHO's criterion of ≥5 medications by ATC fourth-level code; (ii) the exclusion of prescriptions usually for short-term treatments; and (iii) drugs with cumulative annual DDD ≥ 60. Approaches were assessed annually, quarterly, and monthly, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for hospitalization risk. Among 431,620 patients, the DDD ≥ 60 definition showed the least variability (20.47-21.16%) and identified an older more complex cohort. All definitions showed a dose-dependent association with hospitalization risk. Different definitions of polypharmacy result in varying prevalence, with DDD ≥ 60 being the most consistent. A patient-centric approach is crucial to assess the appropriateness of polypharmacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11859879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of multiple medications, increases the risk of various adverse outcomes. However, the variability in definitions across the literature contributes to substantial heterogeneity. Building on the published literature, this study aimed to identify a set of operational definitions of polypharmacy applicable to administrative databases and to assess their association with all-cause hospitalization. Data from the pharmacy refill and hospitalization databases of the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Bergamo, Lombardy, were analyzed. Patients aged ≥40 with at least one reimbursed drug prescription in 2017 were included. Prescription coverage was evaluated using total defined daily doses (DDDs), and all-cause hospitalizations from January to June 2018 were considered. Definitions explored included (i) the WHO's criterion of ≥5 medications by ATC fourth-level code; (ii) the exclusion of prescriptions usually for short-term treatments; and (iii) drugs with cumulative annual DDD ≥ 60. Approaches were assessed annually, quarterly, and monthly, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for hospitalization risk. Among 431,620 patients, the DDD ≥ 60 definition showed the least variability (20.47-21.16%) and identified an older more complex cohort. All definitions showed a dose-dependent association with hospitalization risk. Different definitions of polypharmacy result in varying prevalence, with DDD ≥ 60 being the most consistent. A patient-centric approach is crucial to assess the appropriateness of polypharmacy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多药治疗的操作性定义及其与全因住院风险的关系:使用行政数据库的概念框架。
多种用药,定义为同时使用多种药物,增加了各种不良后果的风险。然而,文献中定义的可变性导致了实质性的异质性。在已发表文献的基础上,本研究旨在确定一套适用于行政数据库的多药操作定义,并评估其与全因住院的关系。来自伦巴第贝加莫当地卫生单位(LHU)的药房补充和住院数据库的数据进行了分析。纳入年龄≥40岁且2017年至少有一次报销药物处方的患者。使用总限定日剂量(DDDs)评估处方覆盖率,并考虑2018年1月至6月的全因住院情况。探讨的定义包括(i)世卫组织ATC四级代码对≥5种药物的标准;(ii)排除通常用于短期治疗的处方;(iii)年累积DDD≥60的药物。方法每年、每季度和每月进行评估,并使用逻辑回归来估计住院风险的优势比(or)。在431,620例患者中,DDD≥60定义的变异性最小(20.47-21.16%),并确定了年龄更大更复杂的队列。所有的定义都显示了与住院风险的剂量依赖关系。不同的多药定义导致患病率不同,以DDD≥60最为一致。以患者为中心的方法是评估综合用药的适当性的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Pharmacologic Agents, Clinical Applications, and Considerations. Pharmacy Students' Perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Pharmacy Education. Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Drug Dispensing Data of Older Adults Living in Northwest Italy. Impacts of Outsourcing Medication Repackaging in Nursing Homes: Quality and Areas of Pharmacy-Nursing Collaboration. Benzodiazepine (BZD) Use and Patient Safety: Opportunities for Community Pharmacy Involvement in the Management of Drug Interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1