Dual-Model Synergy for Fingerprint Spoof Detection Using VGG16 and ResNet50.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY Journal of Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.3390/jimaging11020042
Mohamed Cheniti, Zahid Akhtar, Praveen Kumar Chandaliya
{"title":"Dual-Model Synergy for Fingerprint Spoof Detection Using VGG16 and ResNet50.","authors":"Mohamed Cheniti, Zahid Akhtar, Praveen Kumar Chandaliya","doi":"10.3390/jimaging11020042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we address the challenge of fingerprint liveness detection by proposing a dual pre-trained model approach that combines VGG16 and ResNet50 architectures. While existing methods often rely on a single feature extraction model, they may struggle with generalization across diverse spoofing materials and sensor types. To overcome this limitation, our approach leverages the high-resolution feature extraction of VGG16 and the deep layer architecture of ResNet50 to capture a more comprehensive range of features for improved spoof detection. The proposed approach integrates these two models by concatenating their extracted features, which are then used to classify the captured fingerprint as live or spoofed. Evaluated on the Livedet2013 and Livedet2015 datasets, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, with an accuracy of 99.72% on Livedet2013, surpassing existing methods like the Gram model (98.95%) and Pre-trained CNN (98.45%). On Livedet2015, our method achieves an average accuracy of 96.32%, outperforming several state-of-the-art models, including CNN (95.27%) and LivDet 2015 (95.39%). Error rate analysis reveals consistently low Bonafide Presentation Classification Error Rate (BPCER) scores with 0.28% on LivDet 2013 and 1.45% on LivDet 2015. Similarly, the Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate (APCER) remains low at 0.35% on LivDet 2013 and 3.68% on LivDet 2015. However, higher APCER values are observed for unknown spoof materials, particularly in the Crossmatch subset of Livedet2015, where the APCER rises to 8.12%. These findings highlight the robustness and adaptability of our simple dual-model framework while identifying areas for further optimization in handling unseen spoof materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11020042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we address the challenge of fingerprint liveness detection by proposing a dual pre-trained model approach that combines VGG16 and ResNet50 architectures. While existing methods often rely on a single feature extraction model, they may struggle with generalization across diverse spoofing materials and sensor types. To overcome this limitation, our approach leverages the high-resolution feature extraction of VGG16 and the deep layer architecture of ResNet50 to capture a more comprehensive range of features for improved spoof detection. The proposed approach integrates these two models by concatenating their extracted features, which are then used to classify the captured fingerprint as live or spoofed. Evaluated on the Livedet2013 and Livedet2015 datasets, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, with an accuracy of 99.72% on Livedet2013, surpassing existing methods like the Gram model (98.95%) and Pre-trained CNN (98.45%). On Livedet2015, our method achieves an average accuracy of 96.32%, outperforming several state-of-the-art models, including CNN (95.27%) and LivDet 2015 (95.39%). Error rate analysis reveals consistently low Bonafide Presentation Classification Error Rate (BPCER) scores with 0.28% on LivDet 2013 and 1.45% on LivDet 2015. Similarly, the Attack Presentation Classification Error Rate (APCER) remains low at 0.35% on LivDet 2013 and 3.68% on LivDet 2015. However, higher APCER values are observed for unknown spoof materials, particularly in the Crossmatch subset of Livedet2015, where the APCER rises to 8.12%. These findings highlight the robustness and adaptability of our simple dual-model framework while identifying areas for further optimization in handling unseen spoof materials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 VGG16 和 ResNet50 进行指纹欺骗检测的双模型协同。
在本文中,我们通过提出一种结合VGG16和ResNet50架构的双预训练模型方法来解决指纹活性检测的挑战。虽然现有的方法通常依赖于单一的特征提取模型,但它们可能难以在不同的欺骗材料和传感器类型中进行泛化。为了克服这一限制,我们的方法利用VGG16的高分辨率特征提取和ResNet50的深层架构来捕获更全面的特征,以改进欺骗检测。所提出的方法通过连接提取的特征来集成这两种模型,然后使用这些特征将捕获的指纹分类为真实指纹或欺骗指纹。在Livedet2013和Livedet2015数据集上进行评估,我们的方法达到了最先进的性能,在Livedet2013上的准确率为99.72%,超过了现有的方法,如Gram模型(98.95%)和预训练CNN(98.45%)。在Livedet2015上,我们的方法达到了96.32%的平均准确率,优于几个最先进的模型,包括CNN(95.27%)和livdet2015(95.39%)。错误率分析显示,在LivDet 2013和LivDet 2015中,Bonafide Presentation Classification rate (BPCER)得分均较低,分别为0.28%和1.45%。同样,攻击呈现分类错误率(APCER)在LivDet 2013和LivDet 2015上保持在0.35%和3.68%的低位。然而,对于未知的欺骗材料,观察到更高的APCER值,特别是在Livedet2015的Crossmatch子集中,APCER上升到8.12%。这些发现突出了我们简单的双模型框架的鲁棒性和适应性,同时确定了在处理看不见的欺骗材料方面需要进一步优化的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
DFENet: A Novel Dual-Path Feature Extraction Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images. Real-Time Small UAV Detection in Complex Airspace Using YOLOv11 with Residual Attention and High-Resolution Feature Enhancement. Current Trends and Future Prospects of Radiomics and Machine Learning (ML) Models in Spinal Tumors-A Narrative Review. Efficient Two-Stage Autofocus for Micro-Assembly Based on Joint Spatial-Frequency Image Quality Assessment. Machine Learning-Assisted Classification of Pathogenic Yeasts Using Laser Light Scattering and Conventional Microscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1