Self-Medication Practice and Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Spain.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.3390/nursrep15020053
Eva Manuela Cotobal-Calvo, Concepción Mata-Pérez, Anna Bocchino, Ester Gilart, Belén Gutiérrez-Baena, José Luis Palazón-Fernández
{"title":"Self-Medication Practice and Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Spain.","authors":"Eva Manuela Cotobal-Calvo, Concepción Mata-Pérez, Anna Bocchino, Ester Gilart, Belén Gutiérrez-Baena, José Luis Palazón-Fernández","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15020053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) <b>Background</b>: Self-medication, defined as the use of medications without professional supervision, is a common practice that presents both potential benefits and significant risks. This study analyzes the prevalence, patterns, and determinants of self-medication among health professionals in Spain. (2) <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional descriptive design was employed with 438 health professionals, predominantly women (81.1%), with a median age of 42 years. The majority of the healthcare workers were nurses (45%). (3) <b>Results</b>: The results revealed a high prevalence of self-medication (59.4%). Analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly used. Age and professional knowledge emerged as significant factors influencing this behavior. The main reasons for self-medication included the mildness of symptoms, easy access to medications, and previous successful experiences. Digital sources, especially websites, were the most consulted. Confidence in artificial intelligence tools as a clinical resource was moderate, with 18% of participants consulting AI tools, a rate comparable to the 19.5% for scientific databases. Logistic regression analysis identified age, knowledge of recommended doses, and perceived efficacy as significant predictors, while concern about risks acted as a protective factor. (4) <b>Conclusions</b>: This study highlights the need for educational interventions aimed at promoting responsible self-medication practices and mitigating associated risks among healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Self-medication, defined as the use of medications without professional supervision, is a common practice that presents both potential benefits and significant risks. This study analyzes the prevalence, patterns, and determinants of self-medication among health professionals in Spain. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was employed with 438 health professionals, predominantly women (81.1%), with a median age of 42 years. The majority of the healthcare workers were nurses (45%). (3) Results: The results revealed a high prevalence of self-medication (59.4%). Analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly used. Age and professional knowledge emerged as significant factors influencing this behavior. The main reasons for self-medication included the mildness of symptoms, easy access to medications, and previous successful experiences. Digital sources, especially websites, were the most consulted. Confidence in artificial intelligence tools as a clinical resource was moderate, with 18% of participants consulting AI tools, a rate comparable to the 19.5% for scientific databases. Logistic regression analysis identified age, knowledge of recommended doses, and perceived efficacy as significant predictors, while concern about risks acted as a protective factor. (4) Conclusions: This study highlights the need for educational interventions aimed at promoting responsible self-medication practices and mitigating associated risks among healthcare professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙卫生专业人员自我用药实践及相关因素
(1)背景:自我药疗,定义为在没有专业监督的情况下使用药物,是一种常见的做法,既有潜在的好处,也有重大的风险。本研究分析了西班牙卫生专业人员自我药疗的流行程度、模式和决定因素。(2)方法:采用横断面描述性设计对438名卫生专业人员进行调查,其中以女性为主(81.1%),中位年龄42岁。大多数卫生保健工作者是护士(45%)。(3)结果:自我药疗患病率较高(59.4%)。最常用的是镇痛药和消炎药。年龄和专业知识是影响这种行为的重要因素。自我药疗的主要原因包括症状轻微,容易获得药物,以及以前的成功经验。数字资源,尤其是网站,是咨询最多的。对人工智能工具作为临床资源的信心适中,18%的参与者咨询了人工智能工具,这一比例与科学数据库的19.5%相当。Logistic回归分析发现,年龄、对推荐剂量的了解和感知疗效是重要的预测因素,而对风险的担忧则是保护因素。(4)结论:本研究强调了教育干预的必要性,旨在促进医疗保健专业人员负责任的自我药疗实践和减轻相关风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Symptom Clusters and Related Factors of Late Toxicities in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors After Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Emergency Medical Personnel: A Cross-Sectional Study in Romania. Nurses' Perspectives on the Non-Pharmacological Management of Oral Mucositis in Onco-Hematological Care: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Psychosocial Workplace Environments Enabling Sustainable Employment for People with Mental Health Conditions: A Scoping Review. How Do Culturally and Racially Marginalised (CaRM) Populations in Australia Cope with the Mental Health Impacts from "New Racism"? A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1