Engineering organs, hopes and hybridity: considerations on the social potentialities of xenotransplantation.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2024-013061
Johannes Kögel, Peta S Cook, Nik Brown, Amy Clare, Megan H Glick, Kristofer Hansson, Markus Idvall, Susanne Lundin, Mike Michael, Sofie Á Rogvi, Lesley A Sharp
{"title":"Engineering organs, hopes and hybridity: considerations on the social potentialities of xenotransplantation.","authors":"Johannes Kögel, Peta S Cook, Nik Brown, Amy Clare, Megan H Glick, Kristofer Hansson, Markus Idvall, Susanne Lundin, Mike Michael, Sofie Á Rogvi, Lesley A Sharp","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-013061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of replacing human organs with those from genetically modified pigs holds immense potential for alleviating the shortage of organs necessary for patients in need of transplants. This medical advancement is also accompanied by significant social changes, including the emergence of a bioeconomy, new modes of biotechnology governance, altered human-animal relations and increased public engagement. Some aspects, such as the impact on the transplant allocation system, effects on clinical practice and healthcare provision, global trajectories and most importantly the consequences for patients and their families remain unpredictable. Given that xenotransplantation occurs within a societal context and its success or failure will not be confined to technical feasibility alone, it is essential to engage a social sciences perspective to highlight the social implications and emphasise the importance of social research in accompanying future developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":"51 1","pages":"180-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-013061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of replacing human organs with those from genetically modified pigs holds immense potential for alleviating the shortage of organs necessary for patients in need of transplants. This medical advancement is also accompanied by significant social changes, including the emergence of a bioeconomy, new modes of biotechnology governance, altered human-animal relations and increased public engagement. Some aspects, such as the impact on the transplant allocation system, effects on clinical practice and healthcare provision, global trajectories and most importantly the consequences for patients and their families remain unpredictable. Given that xenotransplantation occurs within a societal context and its success or failure will not be confined to technical feasibility alone, it is essential to engage a social sciences perspective to highlight the social implications and emphasise the importance of social research in accompanying future developments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程器官、希望与杂交:对异种器官移植社会潜力的思考。
用转基因猪的器官代替人体器官的发展,对于缓解需要移植的患者所需器官的短缺具有巨大的潜力。这一医学进步还伴随着重大的社会变化,包括生物经济的出现、生物技术治理的新模式、人与动物关系的改变以及公众参与的增加。一些方面,如对移植分配系统的影响,对临床实践和医疗保健提供的影响,全球轨迹,最重要的是对患者及其家属的后果仍然不可预测。鉴于异种器官移植发生在社会背景下,其成功或失败将不仅仅局限于技术可行性,因此有必要从社会科学的角度来强调社会影响,并强调社会研究在伴随未来发展中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
期刊最新文献
Repulsive and precious: thinking with the tick in Canadian Lyme disease discourse. Implementing narrative medicine in teaching languages for healthcare purposes. 'Our problem here is the pig Ebola': local accounts of epizootics preceding Ebola outbreaks in north-eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. From prerogative instances to histological thinking: a Baconian pedagogy of observation. Constructing a medical lexicon: scribal practices in Armenian medical vocabulary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1