Panenteric capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding - time to change old habits?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000001088
Francesco Segatta, Silvia Paggi, Franco Radaelli, Emanuele Rondonotti
{"title":"Panenteric capsule endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding - time to change old habits?","authors":"Francesco Segatta, Silvia Paggi, Franco Radaelli, Emanuele Rondonotti","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an effective tool for small bowel evaluation. Recent technical advancements, including long-lasting batteries and enhanced optics, have enabled featured capsules (panenteric capsules, PCs) to potentially assess the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The PC provides a potential easy-to-use, comprehensive, single-device approach for evaluating GI bleeding patients. This review critically examines the potential role of PC in patients with GI bleeding by highlighting benefits, limitations, open issues, and future challenges.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evidence on PC for GI bleeding patients remains limited. Two retrospective studies and one recent prospective trial consistently show that when used in the workup of GI bleeding patients, PC is safe, feasible, achieves high diagnostic yield (both in the small and large bowel), and potentially reduces the need for unnecessary colonoscopies. Nevertheless, current challenges include the need for extensive bowel preparation, incomplete colon evaluation, and limited access to trained readers.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The PC holds promise for optimizing the diagnostic workup of GI bleeding patients. However, significant challenges remain. Robust clinical trials comparing standard diagnostic methods to PC-based workup are needed before the adoption of PC in managing bleeding patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an effective tool for small bowel evaluation. Recent technical advancements, including long-lasting batteries and enhanced optics, have enabled featured capsules (panenteric capsules, PCs) to potentially assess the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The PC provides a potential easy-to-use, comprehensive, single-device approach for evaluating GI bleeding patients. This review critically examines the potential role of PC in patients with GI bleeding by highlighting benefits, limitations, open issues, and future challenges.

Recent findings: Evidence on PC for GI bleeding patients remains limited. Two retrospective studies and one recent prospective trial consistently show that when used in the workup of GI bleeding patients, PC is safe, feasible, achieves high diagnostic yield (both in the small and large bowel), and potentially reduces the need for unnecessary colonoscopies. Nevertheless, current challenges include the need for extensive bowel preparation, incomplete colon evaluation, and limited access to trained readers.

Summary: The PC holds promise for optimizing the diagnostic workup of GI bleeding patients. However, significant challenges remain. Robust clinical trials comparing standard diagnostic methods to PC-based workup are needed before the adoption of PC in managing bleeding patients in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泛肠胶囊内镜下消化道出血——该改旧习惯了吗?
审查目的:胶囊内镜(CE)是评估小肠的有效工具。最近的技术进步,包括长效电池和增强型光学技术,使特色胶囊(肠管胶囊,PC)有可能评估整个胃肠道(GI)。PC 为评估消化道出血患者提供了一种潜在的易用、全面的单设备方法。本综述通过强调PC的益处、局限性、未决问题和未来挑战,对PC在消化道出血患者中的潜在作用进行了批判性研究:消化道出血患者使用 PC 的证据仍然有限。两项回顾性研究和最近的一项前瞻性试验一致表明,PC 用于消化道出血患者的检查安全、可行、诊断率高(包括小肠和大肠),并有可能减少不必要的结肠镜检查。然而,目前面临的挑战包括:需要进行大量肠道准备、结肠评估不全面以及训练有素的读片人员有限。然而,目前仍存在重大挑战。在临床实践中采用 PC 对出血患者进行管理之前,需要进行可靠的临床试验,将标准诊断方法与基于 PC 的检查方法进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Glucagon-like peptide agonists and use in short bowel syndrome - what about the side effects? The esophageal microbiome: mechanisms and clinical implications. Implementation science: a primer for hepatology research. Are we missing early pancreatic dysfunction? Expanding faecal elastase testing beyond pancreatic disease. Plasma exchange in acute liver failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1