High Medication Non-Adherence Rates and its Drivers in the General Population: A Cross-sectional Study Using the OMAS-37 Adherence Survey Tool.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00469580251321596
Rønnaug Eline Larsen, Ala Karimi, Tonje Krogstad, Cecilie Johannessen Landmark, Lene Berge Holm
{"title":"High Medication Non-Adherence Rates and its Drivers in the General Population: A Cross-sectional Study Using the OMAS-37 Adherence Survey Tool.","authors":"Rønnaug Eline Larsen, Ala Karimi, Tonje Krogstad, Cecilie Johannessen Landmark, Lene Berge Holm","doi":"10.1177/00469580251321596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substantial variability in patients' medication adherence underscores the key significance of pharmacists and other healthcare providers proactively aiding individuals in achieving optimal medication outcomes. Medication-taking behaviours, barriers, and beliefs varies significantly among medication users. It is crucial to ascertain these factors when designing adherence interventions. The OsloMet Adherence-to-medication Survey tool (OMAS-37) is designed to quantify the degree of adherence, and to assess 37 unique causes for non-adherence. The aim of this study was to assess non-adherence among medication users in the general population utilising the OMAS-37 tool. A cross sectional study among medication users in Norway was conducted in 2021. The features of the general population and three patient subgroups-cardiovascular, pain, and mental health disorders-were characterized and compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Of the 812 participants, with a median age of 50 (IQR 37-59) and 91% (n = 736) identifying as female, 64% (n = 517) exhibited high non-adherence scores indicating poor medication. Main reasons included forgetfulness (42%, n = 343), perceived improvement in health (40%, n = 326), and fear of adverse drug reactions (39%, n = 320). Statistically significant positive adherence factors encompassed increasing age, higher education, medication decision involvement, and pill organiser usage. The cardiovascular subgroup exhibited significantly better adherence than the pain and mental health disorders subgroups. The total sample and all three subgroups demonstrated some variation in the main causes for non-adherence. This first study employing OMAS-37 reveals high non-adherence levels and varying causes of non-adherence among different patient groups, emphasizing the need for targeted adherence interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251321596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251321596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substantial variability in patients' medication adherence underscores the key significance of pharmacists and other healthcare providers proactively aiding individuals in achieving optimal medication outcomes. Medication-taking behaviours, barriers, and beliefs varies significantly among medication users. It is crucial to ascertain these factors when designing adherence interventions. The OsloMet Adherence-to-medication Survey tool (OMAS-37) is designed to quantify the degree of adherence, and to assess 37 unique causes for non-adherence. The aim of this study was to assess non-adherence among medication users in the general population utilising the OMAS-37 tool. A cross sectional study among medication users in Norway was conducted in 2021. The features of the general population and three patient subgroups-cardiovascular, pain, and mental health disorders-were characterized and compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Of the 812 participants, with a median age of 50 (IQR 37-59) and 91% (n = 736) identifying as female, 64% (n = 517) exhibited high non-adherence scores indicating poor medication. Main reasons included forgetfulness (42%, n = 343), perceived improvement in health (40%, n = 326), and fear of adverse drug reactions (39%, n = 320). Statistically significant positive adherence factors encompassed increasing age, higher education, medication decision involvement, and pill organiser usage. The cardiovascular subgroup exhibited significantly better adherence than the pain and mental health disorders subgroups. The total sample and all three subgroups demonstrated some variation in the main causes for non-adherence. This first study employing OMAS-37 reveals high non-adherence levels and varying causes of non-adherence among different patient groups, emphasizing the need for targeted adherence interventions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普通人群中高药物依从率及其驱动因素:使用OMAS-37依从性调查工具的横断面研究
患者药物依从性的实质性变化强调了药剂师和其他医疗保健提供者积极帮助个人实现最佳药物治疗结果的关键意义。用药行为、障碍和信念在用药人群中差异很大。在设计依从性干预措施时,确定这些因素至关重要。OsloMet药物依从性调查工具(OMAS-37)旨在量化依从性的程度,并评估37种不依从性的独特原因。本研究的目的是利用OMAS-37工具评估一般人群中药物使用者的不依从性。2021年在挪威的药物使用者中进行了一项横断面研究。使用Kruskal-Wallis试验对一般人群和三个患者亚组(心血管、疼痛和精神健康障碍)的特征进行了表征和比较。在812名参与者中,中位年龄为50岁(IQR 37-59), 91% (n = 736)为女性,64% (n = 517)表现出高依从性评分,表明药物治疗不良。主要原因包括健忘(42%,n = 343)、感觉健康改善(40%,n = 326)和害怕药物不良反应(39%,n = 320)。统计上显著的积极依从性因素包括增加年龄、高等教育、药物决策参与和药丸组织者的使用。心血管亚组的依从性明显优于疼痛和精神健康障碍亚组。总的样本和所有三个亚组在不依从性的主要原因上显示出一些差异。这项首次采用OMAS-37的研究揭示了不同患者群体中较高的不依从性水平和不同的不依从性原因,强调了有针对性的依从性干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Healthcare Expenditures Among Individuals With and Without Long COVID in the United States. Patients' Perceptions of Physicians' Health Literacy Competencies and "Good" Communication in Family Medicine: A Q Methodology Study. Linking Smart-Phone Addiction to Self-Concept Clarity Among Chinese College Students: The Chain Mediation Roles of Social Anxiety and Social Withdrawal. Prevalence of Labor Induction, its Indication, and Feto-Maternal Outcomes in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prevalence and Determinants of Depression Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women at Risk of HIV in Urban Slums of Kampala.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1