Evaluation of nursing care delivery methods using in a university hospital: a qualitative study.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0254en
Nermin Uyurdağ, Seyhan Çerçi, Satı Birbudak
{"title":"Evaluation of nursing care delivery methods using in a university hospital: a qualitative study.","authors":"Nermin Uyurdağ, Seyhan Çerçi, Satı Birbudak","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0254en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates a university hospital's nursing care delivery methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The population of the study, which was conducted using a qualitative research design and phenomenological approach, consisted of all charge nurses working in a state university hospital (n = 39). The sample was determined to reflect maximum diversity (n = 15). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview form. Description, analysis, and content analysis were performed using the MAXQDA software package. Codes, sub-themes, and themes were created. Necessary permissions were obtained prior to the research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research data were grouped under five themes: the care delivery method used, the decision to use the care delivery method, the decision to use the care delivery method in case of disaster or crisis, the impact of the care delivery method on outcomes, and care delivery method training. A total of 13 sub-themes related to the themes were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that there is no standard structure in the care delivery method, and nurses do not have training.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20240254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0254en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates a university hospital's nursing care delivery methods.

Method: The population of the study, which was conducted using a qualitative research design and phenomenological approach, consisted of all charge nurses working in a state university hospital (n = 39). The sample was determined to reflect maximum diversity (n = 15). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview form. Description, analysis, and content analysis were performed using the MAXQDA software package. Codes, sub-themes, and themes were created. Necessary permissions were obtained prior to the research.

Results: The research data were grouped under five themes: the care delivery method used, the decision to use the care delivery method, the decision to use the care delivery method in case of disaster or crisis, the impact of the care delivery method on outcomes, and care delivery method training. A total of 13 sub-themes related to the themes were identified.

Conclusion: It was found that there is no standard structure in the care delivery method, and nurses do not have training.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一所大学医院护理服务方法的评价:一项定性研究。
目的:对某大学医院的护理服务方式进行评价。方法:采用定性研究设计和现象学方法进行研究,研究对象包括在州立大学医院工作的所有主管护士(n = 39)。确定样本以反映最大的多样性(n = 15)。数据通过面对面访谈收集,采用半结构化访谈形式。使用MAXQDA软件包进行描述、分析和内容分析。代码、子主题和主题被创建。在研究之前获得了必要的许可。结果:研究数据分为五个主题:使用的护理提供方法、使用护理提供方法的决定、在灾难或危机情况下使用护理提供方法的决定、护理提供方法对结果的影响以及护理提供方法培训。共确定了与这些主题有关的13个分主题。结论:发现护理方式缺乏规范结构,护理人员缺乏培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status and factors influencing clinical nurses' attitudes toward information security: a cross-sectional survey. In which stage of the nursing process is ultrasonography used? Effects of risk management plus predictive nursing on adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury behavior. Physical health screening for people with severe mental disorders: a best practice implementation project. Family-centered nursing care model for neonatal intensive care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1